Nature Versus Nurture: Humans Should Morally Become Vegetarians

Topics: Morality, Human, Nature versus nurture Pages: 3 (1312 words) Published: June 18, 2013
Rebecca Chan

Nature versus Nurture: Humans Should Morally Become Vegetarians To many, it is very acceptable and seemingly natural that humans include meat in their common diet. This practice can be found historically and globally across many countries and cultures. It is undeniable that humans are omnivores and have been for the past many millenniums. However, is consuming meat actually natural? What is acceptable may not be natural and may have become acceptable due to our environment and nurture, and it is important to distinguish between the two, as popular acceptance does not equal to moral rightness. In Animal Liberation, Peter Singer argues that, as animals have the ability to feel pain and pleasure, they have sentience and hence, are subject to the equal moral worth as human beings. Therefore he claims that it is only moral that most of us ought to opt for a vegetarian lifestyle. I agree with Singer on this claim based on the Natural Law Theory and with scientific proof that animals indeed have a sentience and also based on our natural physiological design. Singer argues that equality should not be limited only to humans and points out that beings with a sentience should be entitled to equal consideration of their interests (Singer, 1990), with sentience being the ability to perceive through the senses. This is perfectly reasonable as there is ethological evidence that animals do have sentience on several cases, such as sheep being able to recognize faces, prairie dogs speaking their own language. Furthermore, elephants bury their dead, gibbons take care of their elderly, and male bats babysit young bats that are not their offspring while their mothers are out hunting (Basile, 2005). These animals need not do these actions, as these actions are not necessary for their own survival, nor do their own progeny’s survival depend on them. However, these altruistic deeds show that animals do not merely act on instinct. Moreover, emotions are...

References: Basile, T. (n.d.). Animal Sentience and the Evolution of Emotion. Animal Welfare Institute . Retrieved May 28, 2013, from
Freston:, K. (2009, June 11). Shattering The Meat Myth: Humans Are Natural Vegetarians. Huffpost Healthy Living. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from
Mills, M. R. (2009, November 21). The Comparative Anatomy of Eating - Vegsource - Your source for all things vegan and vegetarian.. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from
Singer, P. (2003). Animal liberation. New York, N.Y.: New York Review of Books :. (Original work published 1973)
Towell, L. (2009, October 16). Yes, It 's True: Humans Aren 't Meant to Eat Meat. PETA Prime. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from
VanDeVeer, D., & Pierce, C. (2003). Chapter 1: An Introduction to Ethical Theory. The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book (3rd Edition ed., p. 30). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Weisberg, Z. (2009). The Broken Promises of Monsters: Haraway, Animals and the Humanist Legacy. Journal for Critical Animal Studies , 12(2), 25 - 26. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Should People Become Vegetarian Essay
  • Should Everyone Become a Vegetarian? Essay
  • Should People become vegetarians? Essay
  • Should We All Become Vegetarians? Essay
  • Essay on Should People Become Vegetarians
  • The nature versus nurture debate Essay
  • Nature Versus Nurture Essay
  • Homosexuality: Nature Versus Nurture Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free