Preview

Natural Moral Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1934 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Natural Moral Law
Ethics and Philosophy- Paige Stewart
a) Explain how Natural Moral Law can be used to decide the right moral action
Plan:
Explain the basic principles of Natural Moral Law
Explain about the purpose and that everything seems to be striving to fulfil its purpose
Link Aquinas to Aristotle
‘Do good and avoid evil’
Primary precepts and the use of reason to establish the secondary precepts
Difference between real and apparent goods and interior and exterior acts
Thomas Aquinas used his understanding of Aristotle to develop his ideas of Natural Moral Law. Aquinas believed that when someone chose to go against reason in a situation, it was ‘equivalent to condemning the command of God.’ By using your power of reason in a situation, it can lead you to arrive at the right course of action when confronted with a moral dilemma. Aquinas believed that this enabled us to become informed with Natural Law and with God being the ultimate source of authority it is the moral code that comes down from him. Aquinas' ethical theory was absolutist and deontological, which means that it is focused on the ethicacy of actions.
For people to concentrate on Natural Moral Law, Aquinas accepted that to live in a civilized society there had to be rules that a community could follow. He devised the primary precepts that he thinks are essential to do this. The 5 primary precepts are the 5 basic principles of Aquinas Natural Moral Law which are the preservation of life, reproduction, educating the young, living in a society and worshipping god. These can be developed into the secondary precepts which are practical human rules that can control our daily behaviour, they are also rulings of things we should and shouldn't do because they uphold, or fail to uphold the primary precepts. The secondary precepts are flexible compared to the primary precepts which are firmly set in place.
Aquinas devises the secondary precepts from the primary ones. Aquinas regarded each precept as part of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his Summa Theologica number seventeen, article two, Aquinas is trying to answer the question of whether there is falsity in the senses and, if there is, how it exists. He concludes that falsity does exist in the senses in the way that the senses can misjudge objects. Aquinas maintains that the senses can perceive the likeness of an object in one of three ways. The first is by the color of the object and other proper qualities which occur in only one sense. The second is by the common qualities of shape and size which can be validated by more than one of the senses. Finally, the third occurs accidently and not of its own nature. He follows that by stating the premises for his argument. Aquinas’s first premise is the sense gains false knowledge…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Treatise on Law, Aquinas concerns himself with the origins of law. He wants to know the source of the obligation that law imposes. The questions are these: “By what warrant does the human legislator bind the consciences of people? Doesn’t this power belong to God alone? If people possess it, what are the limits within which they may exercise it?”…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas developed the Natural law Theory, with which he proposed five ‘telos’ that he believed were our duty to follow. His 5 primary precepts- ‘Worship God Ordered society, Reproduction, Learning and Defend the innocent’ are deontological. However, whilst being deontological, Natural Law does have some flexibility with the more teleological, secondary precepts.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas is a well-known philosopher and theologian of all time. In the Summa question 6, article 8 talks about whether ignorance is voluntary. Involuntariness is to act against one’s will. Also, ignorance is the lack of knowledge. Aquinas questions how voluntary ignorance can be; he spends most or all of the eighth article explaining this. Ignorance can occur when one does not realize their ignorance, but their efforts to obtain the knowledge are of no advantage to them. In article two, objection two claims that sins imply ignorance and ignorance causes involuntariness. This leads to the idea that that every sin is involuntary. The second objection claims that sin infers ignorance, which causes involuntariness.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas proposes a number of laws that exist in the world. He believes that God is responsible for eternal law. Aquinas points out that eternal law the way the universe is structured. He understands that a rational being must exist, who is responsible for the structure of the universe, and that rational being must be God. This category of law applies to all things in the universe ranging from rocks to human beings. All of these things have natural tendencies that…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Boylan, M. (2009). Basic Ethics (2nd ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral Law Vs. Natural Law "At the dramatic center of The Scarlet Letter is the idea of the awesomeness and inescapability of the Moral Law, to which all else is finally submitted,"� (Levy 384).…

    • 1849 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustine’s theodicy is mostly influenced by the creation stories found in the Genesis. Augustine had a traditional view of God and thought God was omnipotent and good. The genesis mentions that everything God made was good, therefore the universe that God created is good. Augustine believed there were higher and lower goods but everything was good in its own way.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural laws belief of sexual issues could be argued to be an effective theory to make sexual decisions. It gives you clear rules on what is right or wrong and there is no room for interpretation. Meaning that the theory is easy to follow and treats everybody as equal, everyone knows what the right thing to do in a situation is. However it is an idea that is very outdated. As culture changes so do the views and attitudes of people. So in times today homosexually and the use of contraception is alot more acceptable and happens more often. Aquinas' ideas are no longer a strict set of rules people feel they have to follow so in more modern days it is not seen as useful.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    explicitly noted in his writings, that he was influenced by the work of 13th century philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas. King’s functional definition of natural law was taken from Aquinas’ seminal and most known work, “Summa Theologica”. King agrees with St. Thomas Aquinas’ key precepts of natural law that good should be promoted and carried out, while evil must be identified and avoided. It was King’s view that he had not broken a moral or legal law. King strongly believed in Aquinas teachings, stating that “an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law”. King’s arguments in his letter accurately reflect Aquinas’ philosophy on natural…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas as a Neo-Platonist believes that existence is a good in itself, therefore, all things that improve existence are good. For humans our most important act of existence is the one that separates us from the animals around us, our ability to reason. As animals are not provisioned with morality, then our morality must be based on reason. Reason…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined by the Philosophical Dictionary, the Natural Law Theory is "In moral philosophy, a norm, custom, or set of beliefs shared by people living in different cultures or eras. Such a “law” is supposedly derived from Nature (via reason or some other natural human faculty) and is considered binding on all humans everywhere. Ancient Stoicism, for example, held that there are eternal laws that govern all human actions and that happiness depends on recognizing and living in harmony with these fundamental “laws of nature.” Similarly, Aquinas argued that God established a set of universal laws – ascertainable through reason alone (hence available to everyone, regardless of their religion) – that operate for the welfare and benefit of all creatures.”…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a theologian, Aquinas believes the supreme good derives from the eternal God, rather than a worldview good. The Natural Law theory is central to his work because it connects Aristotle’s argument and harmonizes it with the Church teachings. Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas believed the city was a mean to reach the ultimate end, which is God’s will. In his broad conception of explaining laws human beings should obey, the most virtuous ones are derived from God, not from man. He articulates the principle of obedience and how each person is obligated to perform their duties to society. This also is a slight critic from Aristotle’s teaching. Aquinas stressed the significance of duties, rather than performing deeds. Even though both words are relative to preserving and protecting the city, the teaching of obligations solidity the expectations of moral…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1.) Thomas Aquinas believes that humans are born with a clean slate in a state of potency and acquire knowledge through sense experiences by abstraction of the phantasms. His view on how man acquires knowledge rejects Plato’s theory that humans are born with innate species. Along with Plato’s theory of humans understanding corporeal things through innate species, Aquinas also rejects Plato’s theory that in being born with innate species, humans spend their lives recollecting their knowledge.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Morality serves two universal human needs. It regulates both conflicts of interest between people and those within the individual born of different desires and drives that cannot be satisfied at the same time (Wong, D. 1993). Natural Law and Relativism are two opposing approaches to morality. In comparing and contrasting the two approaches I will also briefly outline the background and principles of each. Natural law can be defined as a set of principles, based on what are assumed to be the permanent characteristics of human nature, that can serve as a standard for evaluating conduct. It is considered fundamentally unchanging and universally applicable. Natural law holds that the basis for moral law, for what people should and should not do, is to be found in our nature as human beings. This means that what we are as human beings contains indications of how we should live (Harrington, D. 2009). Although the concept of natural law has been expressed differently by various philosophers all descriptions have a common thread; that man must live according to his true self (Varga, 1978).…

    • 2320 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays