Preview

Native Americans In Ronald Takaki's A Different Mirror

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1267 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Native Americans In Ronald Takaki's A Different Mirror
How did the English defeat everyone they came into contact with? How were they able to steal land without any consequences? The English not only felt they were the superior race, but they often had the law on their side due to them being white and of the English race. Many of the white men that had powerful authority had the mindset that all English men had, they deserve it all. In A Different Mirror written by Ronald Takaki, he explains how the English were able to acquire all they land and how they used force by any means to push out the other races. He also describes the living conditions of certain races when they are in America.
Ronal Takaki opens our eyes to a different view of one of our early presidents. Andrew Jackson was for removing the Indians, “He supported the efforts of Mississippi and Georgia to abolish Indian tribal units and allow white settlers to take cultivated Indian lands” (Takaki, 2008. Pg. 81). He believed that the deaths of Indians meant that America was advancing civilization. Andrew did not feel guilty about what he stood for. Although they were laws that protected the Indians and their land, he did not obey them. Instead, he would ignore them, “Supreme Court ruled that
…show more content…
The English did not understand the Indians and their lifestyle. They judged them as being barbaric and savage but were mistakenly wrong, “Before contact with the strangers from Europe, the Choctaws practiced communalism” (Takaki, 2008. Pg. 83). The Choctaws were forced to raise animals such as cattle and pigs in a farm setting. They were not longer able to go out and hunt their meals as they had for many years. Along with farming, they were also cultivating cotton fields. After treaties were made and it became legal for the English to take land they pleased, many of the Choctaw Indians moved unwillingly west of the Mississippi

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson’s use of contrasting positive and negative diction convinces his audience of his rightness, and his cockiness still rings true to today. In his address to Congress in regards to indian removal policy, he says, “What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and ranged by a few thousand savages to our extensive Republic . . . ?” (Jackson n. pag.). The word “savage” is unambiguous. When one thinks of a savage, they think of a violent, uncivilized person, a hooligan with…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson was in no uncertain terms, a tyrant. Specifically to native Americans, but somewhat extending to the African American slave population as well. Under Andrew Jackson’s administration, the policy of Indian Removal saw its greatest enactment. Jackson essentially forced the Native Americans off their lands, all the while ignoring supreme court decisions that stated such actions were indeed unconstitutional.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jackson pursues and exterminates all Indians on the western side of the United States. Jackson stated repeatedly, “It was the policy to pursue if Indians tribes and culture were to survive.” Till this day it is still…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In writing his essay The Hunger for Indian Land in Andrew Jackson’s America, Anthony F. C. Wallace briefly examines Andrew Jackson’s presidency from the perspective of the removal of Native Americans from their ancestral homes. His analysis of Jackson’s time in office makes Indian removal just as important as the traditional focal point: Jacksonian democracy. By drawing attention to this previously neglected aspect of the period, Wallace raises very important questions about the much lauded President Jackson and America. In doing so, Wallace highlights the complexity of the interactions between Native Americans and the new “Americans”; he exposes corruption in the early United States; and he unearths the role the industrial revolution played in the loss of much of Native American culture.…

    • 817 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Quickly in Jackson’s presidency he tried to start an era of social reform. During his presidency he founded a party that called themselves American Democracy. A main factor was the Indian Removal. This affected the lives of many Indians. This piece from the Cherokee letter can sum of the thoughts of the Indians, “We are overwhelmed! Our hearts are sickened, our utterance is paralyzed, when we reflect on the condition in which we are placed, by the audacious practices of unprincipled men, who have managed their stratagems with so much dexterity as to impose on the Government of the United States, in the face of our earnest, solemn, and reiterated protestations.”…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Remini, Robert V. The Legacy of Andrew Jackson: Essays on Democracy, Indian Removal, and Slavery. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1988. Print.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A major dilemma for Jackson was what to do with Native Americans living in the South and on this issue Jackson failed at protecting the rights of Native Americans. As shown in the picture, Native Americans living in the South were driven away from their lands to Oklahoma on a path known as the Trail of Tears. Did the Native Americans not have the same rights as the whites living in the South? Apparently Jackson and his successor Martin Van Buren did not ever consider this question and upon this they failed to protect the Constitution. In relation to the issue of Indian removal came another violation of the Constitution by Andrew Jackson. When John Marshall and the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia's extension of state law over Cherokee land was unconstitutional, Andrew Jackson totally ignored the decision. This action violated Supreme Court decisions and strengthened Jackson's reputation as an enemy of the law.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trail Of Tears Analysis

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most people are conscious of the devastating effects The Trail of Tears had on the Cherokee people, some question its necessity and the mindset of President Andrew Jackson to not only let this horrific affair to take lace but to fight tooth and nail for this policy. Despite the plethora of writings in place regarding the injustices that the Native Americans endured during the Trail of Tears very little attention has been given to why the people of that time would allow this forced removal to take place. This paper will analyze the immoral, unconstitutional and illegal engagements that took place during the development of President Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy as well as the actions instigating the trail of trails and the devastating…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1838 and 1839 Andrew Jackson from Tennessee was forceful on Indian Removal, and from 1814 to 1824 jackson was instrumental in negotiating nine out of 11 treaties, which had devastated the southern tribes of their eastern lands in the west. So the Cherokee indians were tired of it so they went to the supreme court. The n in 1830 Jackson pushed a whole new piece of legislation called the “Indian Removal Act”. Jackson’s attitude towards the Native Americans came off as rude because he did not like the Indians and he wanted them gone.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The great Cherokee Nation that had fought the young Andrew Jackson back in 1788 now faced an even more powerful and determined man who was intent on taking their land. But where in the past they had resorted to guns, tomahawks, and scalping knives, now they chose to challenge him in a court of law. They were not called a 'civilized nation' for nothing. Many of their leaders were well educated; many more could read and write; they had their own written language, thanks to Sequoyah, a constitution, schools, and their own newspaper. And they had adopted many skills of the white man to improve their living conditions. Why should they be expelled from their lands when they no longer threatened white settlements and could compete with them on many levels? They intended to fight their ouster, and they figured they had many ways to do it. As a last resort they planned to bring suit before the Supreme Court. Prior to that action, they sent a delegation to Washington to plead their cause. They petitioned Congress to protect them against the unjust laws of Georgia that had decreed that they were subject to its sovereignty and under its complete jurisdiction. They even approached the President, but he curtly informed them that there was nothing he could do in their quarrel with the state, a statement that shocked and amazed them.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act DBQ

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is very difficult to prove racism as a driving factor of an issue, but when reading Jackson’s address to Congress regarding the issue of Indian removal, it is evident that there was prejudice and discrimination present in this context. Jackson calls the Indians “savage hunters”, impediments to “white settlement”, and hopes that they will “cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, Christian community.” Throughout Jackson’s address, it is clear that he believes Colonial settlements and cities are more important to the nation than any Indian matters, and he attempts to lessen the severity of an enormous relocation…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When we look back into history, we are now able to fully comprehend the atrocities the Indians faced at the hands of the historic general and President, Andrew Jackson. It can be seen as one of the most shameful and unjust series of political actions taken by an American government. However, as an American living almost 200 years later, it is crucial to look at the motives possessed by Andrew Jackson, and ask whether he fully comprehended the repercussions of his actions or if is was simply ignorant to what he was subjection the natives to. We must also consider weather he truly had the countries best interest in mind, or his own.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article concentrates on the seventh president of the United States of America, Andrew Jackson, and the ethnic cleansing of Native Americans by forcing relocation to west of the Mississippi River. The removal of the Native Americans was to be voluntary, but it was nothing of the sort. In 1829, President Jackson stated to Congress about the Indian removal that, “This emigration should be voluntary, for it would be as cruel as unjust to compel the aborigines to abandon the graves of their fathers, and seek a home in a distant land.” What he said and what he did were on the contrary. The reason for President Jackson’s removal of the Native Americans was that many saw the Native Americans as uncivilized nations unable to adjust into the American culture. He repudiated his previous statement to Congress and said, “Doubtless, it will be painful for them to leave the graves of their forefathers, but what do they do more than our ancestors did or our children are now doing?”…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Government had agreed to deal with the Natives through "formal treaties", but a lot of changes were made as the government erased and redrew treaty line after treaty line, making their way more towards West. However, many Americans felt respect towards the Indians. They wanted them to be part of their society so they tried to Christianize them, civilize them, gave them the chance to attain literacy. Some Tribes resisted and some followed, especially the "Five Civilized Tribes"-which included the Seminoles, Cherokee, Creeks, Choctaw, and the Chickasaw. The Native Americans related to these tribes went to school, learned about agriculture, owned private property, and even owned black slaves. They became very open to the idea of joining the…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays