There was no longer a higher power to fear and attackers were threatening from every front. Then came Napoleon, his grand armee and the concept of nationalism. Without Napoleon I believe nationalism wouldn't have made the leaps it did in such a small amount of time and revolution wouldn’t have swept across across europe after his defeat. That being said Napoleon was a manipulative tyrant whose liberal speeches and ideals didn't equate to his increasingly authoritarian and colonial actions. Although his policies brought order and stability, it came at the cost of essential freedoms and forced many to give up their way of life. I would say nationalism is the child of both Napoleon and the revolutionaries who fought against him. Napoleon planted the seed and the people helped it
There was no longer a higher power to fear and attackers were threatening from every front. Then came Napoleon, his grand armee and the concept of nationalism. Without Napoleon I believe nationalism wouldn't have made the leaps it did in such a small amount of time and revolution wouldn’t have swept across across europe after his defeat. That being said Napoleon was a manipulative tyrant whose liberal speeches and ideals didn't equate to his increasingly authoritarian and colonial actions. Although his policies brought order and stability, it came at the cost of essential freedoms and forced many to give up their way of life. I would say nationalism is the child of both Napoleon and the revolutionaries who fought against him. Napoleon planted the seed and the people helped it