Preview

National Security Strategy

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1552 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
National Security Strategy
National Security Strategy
As much as the world is being progressed security will always play one of the most important roles as long as the states exist and thus the central responsibility of the nation state is its own survival. Every state has to deal with different issues in this world and the hardest thing is how to deal with them. America which is a very powerful state has to take care of its national security and its citizens by different strategies that are shown in national security strategy. National Security Strategy is a document that U.S.A and also other states make to outline the concerns that are present and how to deal with these problems. Over the past decade or more many, governments, especially western governments, have taken steps to draw together a wide range of different functions, objectives and institutions under the concept of ‘national security’. Thus, the main reason that this strategy is created it is because of citizens and countries that face different types of security threats. This strategy has elements of realism, liberalism and constructivism which are the main theories of international relations.
To begin with, realism is a theory essentially about power and security. States relentlessly seek power and security because they exist in a self-help system. Realism views global society as a system of states where power governs international relations. According to this perspective, the world is a community where national power determines the welfare and prosperity of citizens. States work only to increase their own power relative to that of other states and that self-center is the most important thing above all (Dunne and Schmidt 100-103). The U.S.A NSS claims that America’s power and leadership is something that is necessary to be present in the world and that with every condition this has to be manifested. Thus, in the introduction it is mentioned that one of the strategies of how they will lead in the future will be with



Cited: Changing Worldviews." Chatham House. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Apr. 2015.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phase 2: Seeking a National Strategy: A Concert for Preserving Security and Promoting Freedom (August 1999 - April 2000). This Report devised a U.S. national security strategy to deal with the world in 2025. The purpose of the Phase II Report is to define an American strategy based on U.S. interests and key objectives. It develops a strategy for America to secure the benefits of…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, were acts of terrorism against the United States and its allies. These attacks killed thousands of people, and left the United States in disbelief. Compared to previous history, international terrorism is different in many ways. We cannot win a war solely on military might. United States must fight terrorist organizations, networks, and anyone who wishes to put fear in people around the world. However, the United States must be prepared to respond and fight malicious acts and beliefs that threaten and destroy our American ways of life. In this paper, I will discuss how counter terrorism policy program works, implementation of laws and regulations, and logic diagram. Nevertheless, counter terrorism…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is imperative to understand the differences in ideology when studying the concepts of United States foreign policy towards Latin America. Realistic goals and strategies must be created in order to reshape United States policy towards Latin America. In regards to Smith, the aspect of realism helps people understand how the world operates and how to establish they viable framework of policy (Smith, 2013 p.334). As of now, there are two versions of realism. The first version is conservative realism. What is conservative realism? According to Smith, these are the five basic premises. One, the international system is anarchical. Two, sovereign…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The concept of homeland security is not new; since the bloody birth of the United States in 1776, Americans have been engaged in securing and defending the homeland. However, the current manifestation of the expression Homeland Security was created in the crucible of modern terrorist attacks, most notably that of September 11, 2001. As Noftsinger, Newbold, and Wheeler (2007) note, today’s idea of homeland security was created in response to the increasing terrorist threat, when it was recognized that the increased terrorist threat could not be combatted through conventional means.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NMS serves to focus the Armed Forces on maintaining US leadership in a global community that is challenged on many fronts – from countering the threat of global terrorism to fostering emerging democracies. In this environment, US presence and commitment to partners are essential. Our Armed Forces, operating at home and abroad, in peace and war, will continue to serve as a constant, visible reminder of the United States role to protect common interests. "Our dedication to security and stability ensures that the United States is viewed as an indispensable partner, encouraging other nations to join us in helping make the world not just safer, but…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Realism has three main characteristics: a) states are the key actors in world politics; b) force is a useable and competent tool for states and c) world politics issues are organized hierarchal with military security as their pinnacle. On the other hand, Complex Interdependence is based on the following: a) the key actors in world politics are states; transnational actors and organizations, which communicate via informal and formal channels, b) there is no clear hierarchy in world politic issues and c) force is not used when complex interdependence prevails on a set of issues.…

    • 340 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In accordance with realism, the state is in essence a reflection of the population and so will act in mirror to their characteristics, which realism defines as being egotistical and power hungry, or in more insensitive terms, as Hobbes put it;"solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short", describing human nature as being evil, ruthless, and power wanting and that the state of nature that humans are in is prone to “the war of all against all”. That we are all at war. It is important to note that realism is not one theory but an umbrella for a number of similar explanations for the way in which international politics is conducted,…

    • 939 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many forms to the thought of Realism, classical, neoclassical, defensive, offensive, neorealism and rise and fall realism. Theorists of classical realism associate themselves with the teachings Hobbes and Machiavelli, which emphasize that there will always be flaws to human nature. Thus the power seeking motives, personal interests for states and the focus on material things. In realism states look for security in all of its forms. Realism also explains the world as if it is in an archaic state. Because of the lack of sovereignty and a one world government it defines political order in the international system. According to Professor Betts in the video “That in the international system you are on your own, and have to act like it”. Which means everybody is fighting for their own personal gain. We look to the United Nations or NATO for help but yet they are not world governments, instead they are looked at as hands that will help only when it is in their best interest.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    state

    • 14287 Words
    • 58 Pages

    the realist paradigm. If the American public dislikes realism, then U.S. foreign policy outputs represent a tough…

    • 14287 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Defining Security

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are four main paradigms of International Relations that affect issues in security. Those paradigms are Realism, Pluralism, Marxism, and Social Constructivism. Realism is the idea that states should be self-centered, competitive, and should look after themselves and not trust any other states. The state should do anything within its reach to expand its power in wherever possible being in military or economic sectors in order to secure themselves and be at the top. Realists tend to favor governments that separate the high and low politics and best serve the national interest. Low politics such as health issues, welfare, and other issues of that sort should be dealt at a domestic level and is separate from high politics, such as war. The idea globalization in the 60’s and 70’s took International Relations to a different perspective because not only did they have to deal with military power issues but now they had economic power issues to worry about. That’s where Neo-Realism developed. Neo-realism still maintained…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the late 20th century, realism was seen as a way of managing all of the world 's powerful nations peacefully and co-operating for the advantage of those concerned. The international interaction was based less on political principles and more upon the balance of power between the worlds leading nations, as introduced to Western politics by Henry Kissinger, to the Nixon Government. 'We must remember the only time in the history of the world that we have had any extended periods of peace…

    • 1606 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: * “Adapting America’s Security Paradigm and Agenda,” R. Godson and R. Shultz, accessed on January 11, 2011, http://www.strategycenter.org/files/adapting_the_paradigm.pdf…

    • 3825 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of national interest can be defined as the goals that states pursue to maximize what is selfishly best for their country. It is a very central issue in international relations. National interest could also be defined as the principles, perceptions and practicalities that together shape a state’s foreign policies. Basically, a state’s sovereignty is its most important asset and it seeks to preserve and promote it at all costs. In his book National Interest, Joseph Frankel says that there are three analytical distinctions for national interest. The first distinction is aspirational. This usually covers broad statements of belief that encompasses the nation’s historical view and of the people’s beliefs. The second distinction is operational. This usually includes short term goals that arise from necessity or things that are included in important foreign policies. The third aspect is the basic definition of national interest. National interest calls attention to the real-world environment of international relations by emphasizing that each state exists within a larger entity that is linked to an even bigger system which also tries to advance its own political interests. This attention to the system allows policy makers in other states the opportunity to make an educated decision on their advancements in relations with external states as well as making inter-state agreements by searching for common goals. A foreign policy that has a clear statement of national interest has the advantage of staying power during overseas ventures because it allows for a clear understanding of the state’s position on specific issues. I will touch on several important political plans and doctrines that have affected the relations with rest of the world with the United States.…

    • 2005 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Concept of Security

    • 11613 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Redefining ‘security’ has recently become something of a cottage industry.1 Most such efforts, however, are more concerned with redefining the policy agendas of nation-states than with the concept of security itself. Often, this takes the form of proposals for giving high priority to such issues as human rights, economics, the environment, drug traffic, epidemics, crime, or social injustice, in addition to the traditional concern with security from external military threats. Such proposals are usually buttressed with a mixture of normative arguments about which values of which people or groups of people should be protected, and empirical arguments as to the nature and magnitude of threats to those values. Relatively little attention is devoted to conceptual issues as such. This article seeks to disentangle the concept of security from these normative and empirical concerns, however legitimate they may be. Cloaking normative and empirical debate in conceptual rhetoric exaggerates the conceptual differences between proponents of various security policies and impedes scholarly communication. Are proponents of economic or environmental security using a concept of security that is fundamentally different from that used by Realists? Or are they simply emphasizing different aspects of a shared concept? Do those who object to ‘privileging’ the nation-state rather than, say, the individual or humanity share any conceptual views with students of ‘national security’? This article attempts to identify common conceptual distinctions underlying various conceptions of security. Identifying the common elements in various conceptions of security is useful in at least three ways: First, it facilitates asking the most basic question of social science,…

    • 11613 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    State security basically entails the tendency of a nation adhering to its own set of demands in regard to the issue of security policies (Baylis, J.2010, p.233).Traditional security also involves a host of other aspects that are defined by virtue of subordination. Describing the matter further reveals that state security is primarily the protection of available institutions, ethics or values within a nation, and above all human beings living inside its boundaries (Brauch, 2003, 204). State security is therefore judged by virtue of how well a particular state can stop attacks, and at the same time defeat external threats. An example of this is Australia white Defense paper policies that were aim to build Australia’s defense strategies to protect their border for future external threats after seen terrorist attack on America September 2001 followed by other terrorist attack in other part of the World (Department of Defense 2009,p.16). State Security is Australia concerned ensuring the country is freedom from potential attack and to protect their border from asylum seekers. Therefore Defense is essential to secure and manage the country security.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays