National School Lunch Case Study

The prices of the given lunches exceed the amount of ailment in schools. Schools are required to provide a set amount of lunch for a set price that some may find unreasonable. Due to the fact that price exceeds quantity, students are refusing to eat. The National School Lunch Program claims to “provide nutritionally balanced, low-cost or free lunches to more than 31 million children each school day,” (National School Lunch Program 1) but do they mean it? Often times the factor of nutrition is questionable in the food provided in school lunches. An example being one day a student who does not possess the benefit of the National School Lunch Program’s free lunch decides to eat the so-called “nutritionally balanced food” (National School Lunch
One can evaluate the cost of school lunches by subtracting the price that the National School Lunch Program pays for when a student gets a free lunch, which is $2.93, (National School Lunch Program 2) by the amount they pay when a student pays for a lunch, which is $0.28 (National School Lunch Program 20). One would conclude the answer to be $2.65. What person would pay what would be rounded up to approximately three dollars for a measly sandwich, roll, and potatoes that are usually the “healthy” kind [“healthy foods” being used as “whole foods” which is known to be costly. Thus, the nickname “whole check” (The High Cost of Healthy Food 2)] when you can get three delicious chicken sandwiches for almost the same price at McDonald’s right down the street? One may confirm the fact that it is healthy because it is quoted right from school nutrition.org. “School meals are healthy meals that are required to meet the Dietary Guidelines for Americans” (School Nutrition 1). The National School Lunch Program should allow an additional point of interest in their school lunches such as additional food, otherwise the cost is not worth it for students who have to pay for their