Preview

NMS Compare And Contrast Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
279 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
NMS Compare And Contrast Essay
The objectives in the NMS and President Trump’s Afghanistan strategy are similar as they both focus on two of the objectives. Trump’s strategy and the NMS both concentrate on strengthening our network of allies and partners and disrupting, degrading and defeating violent extremist organizations (NMS 2015, p. 6 & Trump Strategy, p. 5).
Trump’s Strategy spells out that it will utilize and integrate all instruments of U.S. national power, diplomatic, economic and military (Trump, p. 5). It also focuses on getting our allies to contribute more funding, troops and support to the effort (Trump, p. 7). Similarly, the NMS spells out that working with international partners and utilizing all elements of DIME is the only way to successfully defeat violent extremist organizations (NMS 2015, p. 8). Both of these suggest that “the whole of government approach” not just military focus is the path ahead for success. Trump cites the problems with the hasty withdrawal in Iraq as the reason for a new strategy. …show more content…
8). The difference in the NMS and Trump Strategy is the NMS addresses that “resources are constrained” but gives no clear path forward on how the U.S. will pursue objectives with less resources available (Freedburg, p. 2). President Trump’s strategy is more specific as it identifies that Pakistan has to stop harboring violent extremists and step up their commitment. He clearly identifies that developing the partnership with India is critical to the strategy as they can be a key economic and security partner as one of “the world’s largest democracies” (Trump, p.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    C200 Exam
    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    C200 Exam

    1. In President Obama’s speech at West Point, he announced that 30,000 additional troops would be sent to Afghanistan. He made this decision because he said it was vital to the United States’ national interest. The vital national interest at risk in President Obama’s address is the security and safety of the American people as well as the “security of our allies and the common security of the world.” By involving the military and increasing the troop strength, President Obama can achieve the objectives of his strategy. His objectives are to keep the Taliban from becoming powerful, prevent them from government rule, improve Afghanistan security forces and government so they can manage their own country and prevent Al Qaeda from establishing refuge in other countries. If you follow the framework of several important U.S. documents, such as the National Defense Strategy (NDS) and Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) they will outline this same strategy. The National Defense Strategy states that it is the responsibility of the military to protect ourselves and our allies from attack. It states that the military should help protect and secure our vital interests abroad. U.S. security is linked with the security of the international community. The physical integrity of our country is protected by the military through multiple security controls. One of these security controls is through deployments of the armed forces. The Quadrennial Defense Review states the mission of the U.S. military is to protect the American people and advance our nation’s interests. The vital interests of the United States are intertwined with the integrity and resilience of allies abroad. Our vital interests are security, prosperity, broad respect for universal values and an international order that promotes cooperation among our allies. The President’s vision is to become more powerful domestically while bringing together all elements of national power. We need to help our neighbors…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Changes the Obama Adminsitation Has Made in Foriegn Policy
    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Changes the Obama Adminsitation Has Made in Foriegn Policy

    In 2010 the National Security Strategy dramatically shifted from the philosophy of the Bush administration’s views on international security. It announced the obvious concern of the United States’ role in the increasing globalization of the world. The Obama administration places more emphasis on cementing traditional allies as well as creating new alliances with other states. This way the responsibility of world security would be more shared rather…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Iraq War and Isis Fighters
    • 569 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Iraq War and Isis Fighters

    There are two new elements in this policy, First, air strikes will not be restricted to areas where ISIS poses a threat to the U.S.…

    • 569 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Billie
    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Billie

    Dr Toby Dodge has identified several faulty assumptions that underpin military intervention, which explain why the US failed to bring order and development to Afghanistan and Iraq. One of these assumptions is that military force can achieve political ends, something which it did not do in Afghanistan. Henry A. Crumpton, a former CIA officer who was largely involved in ousting the Taliban, confessed that winning the war in Afghanistan required the US to “get in at a local level and respond to people’s needs so that enemy forces cannot come in and take advantage.” In ignoring this fundamental aspect of counterinsurgency, efforts succeeded only in keeping urgent problems at bay while hoping that the situation in Afghanistan would improve on its own. This brings us to a second faulty assumption underpinning military intervention: the overestimation of the stability, competence and popularity of the intervener’s local allies.…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hart Rudman Commission Report
    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hart Rudman Commission Report

    Phase 2: Seeking a National Strategy: A Concert for Preserving Security and Promoting Freedom (August 1999 - April 2000). This Report devised a U.S. national security strategy to deal with the world in 2025. The purpose of the Phase II Report is to define an American strategy based on U.S. interests and key objectives. It develops a strategy for America to secure the benefits of…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Essay
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Essay

    The character Don Anselmo, from “The Gentlemen of Rio en Medio,” is a lot alike the character Mrs. Higgins, from “All the Years of Her Life.” But first let’s look at their differences.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and Contrast Essay
    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Essay

    Although they are two totally different battles, the Normandy Landings and the Battle of Gettysburg have many similarities and differences. The Normandy Landings are also referred to what most people recognize today as D-Day. It took place on June 6, 1944 and was an allied invasion on the coast of Normandy. The Battle of Gettysburg took place a little over eighty years before D-Day. It was a significant battle during the Civil War. The battle was fought July 1-3, 1863 in and around the town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Should The United States Empower The Afghan War?
    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should The United States Empower The Afghan War?

    The United States should empower the Afghan Government to actively pursue peace negotiations with the Taliban because total victory is neither plausible nor affordable. U.S. and NATO have battled the Taliban for sixteen years. Some defense analysts estimate the Afghan war cost the U.S. between $4 to $6 trillion dollars. Furthermore, thousands of Americans sacrificed their lives and limbs in pursuit of victory against the Taliban. Yet, the Taliban insurgency remains resilient today. The U.S. military strategy is unsuccessful and will not work as long as Pakistan harbors the Afghan Taliban and there’s a corrupt unsustainable Afghan government. Therefore, the U.S. should place more emphasize and prioritization on diplomatic and economic actions to establish a peace agreement with…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Essay
    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Essay

    The NFL draft has discovered many unique NFL quarterbacks since 1936. That is 76 years of teams picking their franchise quarterbacks. Many quarterbacks have been drafted, some are a “bust” and some are record-breaking hall of famers. Teams take a risk every year to find their franchise player to take them to the next level. Throughout the past 76 years no two hall of fame quarterbacks compare and are so much alike than Tom Brady and Joe Montana. Tom Brady and Joe Montana have mastered their craft of becoming a starting NFL quarterback in two different eras, from record-breaking performances to upsetting defeats.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    National Security Strategy
    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages

    National Security Strategy

    The date September 11, 2001 has changed the way in which the entire world started to perceive threats and their own security related to these threats. Concerning the security and approach of the U.S., the White House has published its new ‘National Security Strategy’ in 2002 setting a guideline for its eventual war on terrorism. This is the primary text that will be mainly dealt with in this writing because it is the official source showing U.S. plans of action. The 35 page long document alongside other issues mainly refers to the supremacy of the U.S. concerning its military power in which Bush’s policy of preemptive wars is justified as a necessity to fight terrorism. My argument in this paper is that when one analysis the U.S. national security plan after the attacks of September 11, the National Security Strategy is flawed, especially regarding certain points, first of all the threats are set too broadly in which it gives the U.S. the right to attack any state which is seen as a possible threat rather then mainly focusing on the most crucial terrorist groups alarming the USA such as al-Qai‘da. In addition to this the U.S. foreign policy in my opinion is one, which rather than solving the problem of terrorism will create more enemies and in addition increase the vulnerability of America itself because of the wrong type of actions taken in the military sense and the high level of involvement in regions with Islamic character.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Taliban Argumentative Essay
    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Taliban Argumentative Essay

    By the fourth year of President Obama’s presidency, he wanted to negotiate with the Taliban. There was no other way that the United States could prevent from Afghanistan going back to a civil war without negotiating. However, one individual didn’t think that a stable Afghanistan was essential. Richard Holbrooke believed that a stable Pakistan was essential. He believed that Afghanistan could fall to the Taliban and that would be a black mark on American diplomacy and the military similar to the fall of Saigon in 1975 during the Vietnam War (Sanger, 132). Strategically, Holbrooke believed, that this would mean very little. However, if Pakistan fell to the Taliban, the nuclear weapons would be possessed by them and this would be a huge problem…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    National Security Strategy
    • 1552 Words
    • 5 Pages

    National Security Strategy

    As much as the world is being progressed security will always play one of the most important roles as long as the states exist and thus the central responsibility of the nation state is its own survival. Every state has to deal with different issues in this world and the hardest thing is how to deal with them. America which is a very powerful state has to take care of its national security and its citizens by different strategies that are shown in national security strategy. National Security Strategy is a document that U.S.A and also other states make to outline the concerns that are present and how to deal with these problems. Over the past decade or more many, governments, especially western governments, have taken steps to draw together a wide range of different functions, objectives and institutions under the concept of ‘national security’. Thus, the main reason that this strategy is created it is because of citizens and countries that face different types of security threats. This strategy has elements of realism, liberalism and constructivism which are the main theories of international relations.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    National Military Strategy Research Paper
    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    National Military Strategy Research Paper

    The NMS serves to focus the Armed Forces on maintaining US leadership in a global community that is challenged on many fronts – from countering the threat of global terrorism to fostering emerging democracies. In this environment, US presence and commitment to partners are essential. Our Armed Forces, operating at home and abroad, in peace and war, will continue to serve as a constant, visible reminder of the United States role to protect common interests. "Our dedication to security and stability ensures that the United States is viewed as an indispensable partner, encouraging other nations to join us in helping make the world not just safer, but…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The War On Terrorism
    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The War On Terrorism

    “Have a wolf by it’s ear, and we can neither hold him nor safely let him go.” We are in an impossible situation. One that we can neither withdraw, nor remain safely without consequences. We have long overstayed our time in Afghanistan, but what will happen if we withdraw our troops, how long before Taliban takes over, with even more hatred fueling their terrorism than before. But if we stay, how many more soldiers or civilians will be sacrificed fighting in this hopeless war. In order to win a war, on foot combat is essential. But the war on terror is so wide ranging, it can never be overcome. With a war on terror, I believe that we should distance ourselves from combat.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Operation Zarb E Azb Analysis
    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Operation Zarb E Azb Analysis

    This level describes the roles of management of economy, diplomatic and military solutions to accomplish the final objectives. In this operation, final objectives are to remove terrorism from Pakistan and restrain its land from covert proxy wars. Pakistan lost 19,633 civilian and 5,966 security personnel since beginning of war on terror. These are the enormous sacrifices from any country who engaged in any military venture. The irony is that besides colossal assistance by Pakistan and its security forces, an ungrateful tone always arises from Afghanistan’s side either from Afghan officials or US’ alliances. This ongoing operation not only eliminating terrorists from Pakistan, but also contain the precarious situation that would craft after US-NATO forces’ with-drawl from Afghanistan. As Afghanistan security forces not able to control the cross border flow of…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics