Preview

NCAA Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
675 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
NCAA Athletes Should Not Be Paid
Should NCAA athletes be paid? The NCAA makes six billion dollars annually(Frederick). Davis points out the SEC recently surpassed the $1 billion mark for football receipts. The Big Ten is close behind at $905 million. He reminds us that the football programs at Texas, Florida, Georgia, Michigan and Penn State earn between $40 million and $80 million each year in profits. The NCAA received $771 million from CBS and Turner to broadcast last year's basketball tournament (Davis). The athletes get none of the money that comes in from their sports. The NCAA says that athletes should not be paid because the majority of the time the athletes have scholarships and exposure to professional teams (Frederick). Almost all coaches are against the …show more content…
states, the highest paid public official is currently the head coach of a state university's football or men's basketball team", said Marc Edelman. Players argue that colleges can definitely afford to pay players because they are non-profits. Colleges spend money right when it comes in the door because they are non-profits. The NCAA has enforced stipends to players to help cover expenses. Stipends range from 2,000 dollars to 5,000 dollars depending on the sport that the athlete is playing and school that the athlete is attending. The NCAA enforced this because players complained about going to bed hungry at night and not being able to perform to the best of their ability because the lack of food that they were able to get (Isidore). NCAA athletes think they should be paid because the physical risk they take for their teams. Football players commonly get hurt and can not play in the NFL (Keolanui). The athletes also think they should be paid because the profit …show more content…
Many NCAA athletes are injured and cannot play again (Frederick). Also, many of them sustain injuries that can impact their personal life like getting paralyzed (Keolanui). Lastly, many NCAA athletes sustain brain injuries. 96 percent of former division I NCAA football players sustain injuries (Edelman). Many NCAA athletes are injured and can not play again. They should get paid because they give up their bodies for their school. For example, Kevin Ware snapped his leg in half and might not be able to play again. This happened during an elite game in a NCAA tournament basketball game. The game that this injury happened in, the NCAA received over 600,000 dollars (Frederick). They need to be payed in college, because sports careers can be short and sometimes players can't get jobs after if they are hurt. The players get none of the six billion dollars that the NCAA gets

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After doing some research over a year ago and taking another look at this issue now, the question about paying college athletes has stayed the same. The debate whether to pay college athletes or not arose in the 1980s after Southern Methodist University was caught paying football players for their services. Upon discovery of these infractions, SMU was administered the “death penalty”, including loss of scholarships and no participation in bowl games for five years. The controversy surrounding paying college athletes seems to have risen from this unfortunate circumstance and has been cultivated into a huge social topic today. Following the SMU scandal in the late 1980s the NCAA rewrote their guidebook that describes an athlete’s role in an academic institution. According to the NCAA, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (NCAA.com). Looking at the arguments made by the NCAA, they make a valid point in showing how athletes are “compensated” for their participation in sports. According to the NCAA, “Many [athletes] receive athletics grants-in-aid that can be…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, college athletes should be paid. As previously stated in the words of NCAA President Mark Emmert, “I think not paying athletes is tradition and also there would be less fans at games if they were paid.” Paying athletes would not cause fewer fan to attend games. They need money to get them started just in case they don’t make it to the professional level of their sport, which most don’t. In conclusion I believe College athletes should get paid for their risk of playing the game they…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College athletes should be paid in order to: help them financially accommodate their expensive lifestyles, give them the money they played hard to earn, and to eliminate unethical recruiting and under the table payments. Considering how hard it is to support yourself while playing sports in college, the millions of dollars universities and the NCAA makes off of you and your teammates, and the unfair advantages in recruiting that some colleges deploy, paying student athletes should be heavily considered by everyone that calls themselves a sports…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NCAA makes an estimate of nine hundred and eighty nine million dollars annually. The NCAA is able to make this gigantic profit while paying its employees absolutely nothing. If this situation would happen with a large employer paying its employees nothing, the company would get into serious legal trouble. However, since they are college athletes, society thinks it is okay. While many people say that receiving an education is enough of a privilege and paying college athletes would ruin the spirit of the game, college athletes should nevertheless be able to use their names for monetary gain because, everyone else in the business gets paid, college athletes train like professional athletes and athletes produce millions for their college but are paid nothing.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NCAA sports are one of the most popular foundations in America. The NCAA makes a round 5.8 billion dollars per year. That’s a lot of money right? So the question is if they make all that money should college athletes get paid? This has been an argument topic for a while now and some say college athletes should and some say college athletes shouldn’t get paid. There are many reasons for both of why they should or shouldn’t. If college athletes were to get paid, it could help the athletes financially, it could make the sport more competitive, and it is like a full time job to the athletes.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our world, people who bring in money with their talents are usually compensated for their efforts. It makes complete sense right? Well for college athletes, they bring in billions of dollars worth of revenue for their school, but do not get compensated for their talents whatsoever. Most people argue that only professional athletes should be paid because it is their profession, but people do not take in account for all the hard work and effort these student athletes put in. Just like professional athletes, college athletes put their body on the line, and a free bachelor's degree is not worth their body they put on the line. Someone that could potentially injure their body for life deserves more than a free bachelor's degree. Secondly, if these college athletes cannot make any money or benefits, they should be able to have to opportunity to get a job like a normal college student. Wrong, the NCAA restricts the athletes to get a job or make money because they do not want them to cash in on their performances in any way. There is a double standard in this situation that is not fair for the athletes who are just as broke as any other college student. Lastly, the NCAA does not see college sports as professional simply because the athletes are college students. On the other hand, we see college coaches making salaries comparable to professional coaches and players. If it is not a professional sport, coaches should not be paid professionally. College athletes should be compensated for their play in collegiate sports because of the money, they attract billions of dollars of revenue to their school while risking their bodies for no pay and no opportunity for pay, due to NCAA regulations that will not allow athletes to work for money, leaving them essentially broker college students than the rest.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the NCAA began, all athletes have been recognized as amateurs therefore are unable to receive any form of benefits or compensation for their lost wages. All the while the coaches are being paid millions of dollars and their athletic programs bring in large amounts of money. The NCAA is one of the most hypocritical institutions around. Oklahoma State, in the 2007-2008 football season, was 10th in the nation with revenue being brought in at $88,554,438 (ESPN.com). This amount is brought in solely from the football program and not including the other athletic programs that Oklahoma State offers. With most of that revenue going towards paying for their equipment, traveling expenses, and paying the staff, but the athletes receive none of this…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    College athletes are the hardest working individuals in college. Balancing academics and sports is never a simple task and is especially challenging in college. The athletes are still required to achieve passing grades, although many of them will play professionally. Paying college athletes would benefit all athletes, providing a small stipend for all of the sacrifices they have made practicing, training, and traveling, in addition to school work.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is simply not enough money for each athlete to be paid. The NCAA also has a policy called Title IX, which basically states that if one athlete gets money, every athlete at that university has to get compensated for the same amount. Meaning that a women’s field hockey player will be granted the same amount as a starting quarterback who fills up stadiums. Once people hear that this would be the reality if college athletes were paid, their opinions may change. The NCAA is huge on ameatur status and if they ever paid student athletes, they would break the golden rule that college athletes have been running on since the beginning of college sports. A few hundred dollars a month for each athlete isn’t going to stop any of the illicit activities involved with collegiate athletics because this isn’t about needing material things. What primarily causes improper benefit violations is greed. Student-athletes break rules because they want something they normally could not have, not because they needed something most other students had.…

    • 2491 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Athletes Get Paid

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    58% of college coaches think that there athletes should get paid for playing sports at the college level. Even though they are marketing athletes on merchandise, athletes should not get paid because they are student’s first and athletes second. Colleges don’t have a huge budget for paying athletes and the students are required to go to school. The students are at the age where they won’t budget the money and they will waste all of it. They are already be taken care of by the program by using the equipment, facilities for whatever sport they play , get the spotlight on them, people look up to them, and they still want money. Even though schools have money, they would need a better budget to pay every athlete that plays a sport.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Amongst the controversy surrounding the NCAA’s recent crackdown on violations with regards to college programs compensating players and players accepting compensation from universities and outside sources, one question has understandably been brought up. It is a question that was bound to be asked sooner or later, and one without an obvious answer: should college athletes be paid? It is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, question that surrounds the world of college sports. The answer, quite simply put, is no.…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many reasons why college athletes should not be paid and one of them is that the athletes are already being compensated in nonmonetary ways. So many times it is overlooked that an athletic scholarship is a major financial package or benefit worth in excess of thirty thousand dollars, as we all know college is expensive. Students at universities/colleges all across the nation would love to have a scholarship and know that their education is being taken care of. In today’s world, one of the greatest things you could have going for yourself is going to school under the umbrella of a full scholarship. College is so expensive; students have to take out loan after loan just to further their education, just at a chance to be successful in life. Knowing that your education is taken care of you is a major…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead, a substantial share of the college sports' revenue stays in the hands of the administrators, athletic directors, and coaches. Their coaches earn at least $100,000 per year to coach a major sport such as football, baseball or basketball at a school. The coaches will also receive bonuses for when the teams continue to make it to the playoffs, win championship games and break school records. Meanwhile, the athletes receive nothing as a bonus. The second company to make money off the backs of these kids is the NCAA.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been much debate over the past year or so as to if college athletes should be paid, independently of their scholarship, for their hard work and dedication to their school and team. The life as a student-athlete is not easy because of the time dedicated to athletics and the time they need to dedicate to their studies. For example, the life of a Division 1 athlete might include waking up, going to class, going to workout and practice, staying after for film sessions, and then only getting to do their homework. This commitment is huge. Based upon that type of true dedication, it is a legitimate request that the college athletes should be paid for their work.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At some colleges, college athletics are a key source of income, and they attract students to their institutions. Universities depend on their athletes to produce and maintain the popularity of their school's name. College athletes are suppose to be the best of the best on that level, so why do college athletes not get paid? The National Collegiate Athletic Association, NCAA, says that it is trying to protect the athletes from "exploitation by professional and commercial enterprises" (Brawn). Many argue that student athletes should not be paid because they are receiving an education through a scholarship. These people feel that the promise of their education being paid for is enough for the college athletes. On the opposite side of this topic, people argue that the college athlete generates enough income for the universities, and they feel that the university owes the athletes more than a scholarship. Student athletes should be given a small amount of pay for their services to the university.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays