Preview

N. T. Wright's Theodicy Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1081 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
N. T. Wright's Theodicy Analysis
When studying theodicies you can find that some are extremely intellectual, while others can be more practically applied to evil. The N.T. Wright and the Problem of Evil theodicy is somewhere in between the scale of extremes. N.T. Wright takes studies from the Bible to answer questions of Gods involvement of evil and gives Christians a way for them to be active as well. When N.T. Wright was forming his theodicy it is obvious he spent a lot of his time in the scriptures for answers. Wright would say there is an account for evil in both the Old and New Testament. When Wright was looking for the origin of evil he claimed he could not find any in either the Old or New Testament. Although the explanation of the existence of evil is not explained, …show more content…
Wright is the role humans are challenged and should take part take in the problem of evil. A unique aspect of humans participating in the solution of evil is the concept of forgiveness. If humans allowed more room for forgiveness it would not allow evil to linger. The idea of forgiveness is also Biblical. Jesus’s crucifixion was the ultimate example of forgiveness. Don’t forget the crucifixion was an example of God fighting against evil. Forgiveness is one example Jesus left humans to be active to evacuate evil. Humans are obviously apart of the problem of evil so it would make sense that humans can also be apart of the solution. By partnering with God against the problems of evil it gives opportunities for people to grow more intimate with God. The Bible is clear in Romans 8:11 “…if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies because of his Spirit who lives in you.” We have the same power that raised Christ from the dead inside of us, so we mine as well use it to fight against evil …show more content…
Wright’s theodicy there are just a couple minor things that could be viewed as negatives or complications. Wright spends a lot of time explaining Gods efforts in the Bibles to fight against evil. Jesus’s life, the resurrection, and Pentecost are a few examples that have been mentioned before. N.T. Wright believes that the ultimate destruction of evil is the second coming of Jesus. Although the Bible is clear in supporting N.T. Wright on this position, but it can lead for some confusion especially in a pastoral role. Wright is also a big advocate for people partnering with God to eliminate the evil. The only problem here is it is hard to influence people to make a change when they are also taught evil will never stop influencing people and the earth until Jesus comes back. Wrights thinking is not flawed, but the problem is the practical usage. It could potentially be hard for a pastor to encourage his church to fight evil because people may see it as a lost cause because they will never be able to completely eliminate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I consider myself fairly knowledgeable about the subject of Jesus's words and deeds, and Wright gave me new perspectives that certainly enhance my understanding. He calls Jesus a revolutionary in the subtitle,…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the book, Wright continually puts down other writers (such as C.S Lewis) and people who do not believe the same way that he does. An example of this is when Wright tells those who interpret Romans 8 differently than him to, “see a therapist” (170). This attitude of condemnation towards those who have opposing views to Wright’s, significantly hinders his message of hope. Another weakness of the book is the continuous marketing Wright does for other books that he has written. Phrases such as, “as I have shown elsewhere”(60) and “as I have set out in much more detail elsewhere”(147) drastically detract from the flow of the writing and would be better left…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Dealing with the demonic should be seen as a truth encounter rather than a power encounter” (Anderson, 2000, p. 258) this quote by Anderson, 2000, basically sums up his entire counseling theory in The Bondage Breaker. Anderson believes that the majority of what is construed as mental illness by psychologists today is actually demonic strongholds over the mind. Throughout his book, Anderson relays stories about patients he has dealt with whom he says have experienced some sort of physical ailment or mental illness such as hearing voices or physical deficiencies, and after completing the 7 steps in his counseling theory have seen remarkable improvements in their physical and mental health. Anderson believes that we wage a war against spiritual forces in our daily lives and even Christians are not free from the attacks of evil. As an example to his theory, Anderson illustrates a road Christians walk towards Christ with demonic forces leering on either side; his theory is that if a person is to engage in activity with these forces, they become overcome and their minds are controlled by demonic powers. Anderson stresses that everyone has a right to be free and that if they will regain control of their minds and “take every thought captive to the obedience of Christ” (Anderson, 2000, p.69), they will have the ability to overcome the forces which control them. The steps to freedom recommended in Anderson’s theory are: #1 Denouncing any involvement in satanic customs, #2 Overcoming deception, #3 Learning to forgive, #4 Submitting to higher authority, #5 Learning to be humble and caring towards others, #6…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mackie’s first criticism of this solution is that if God was omnipotent and he created men so that they would favour choosing good over evil, why did he not create them such that they would always choose good? The obvious response to this claim is that to constrain man’s actions in such a way is to critically undermine freedom of the will; to demand that man always choose one way whether it be in the promotion of good or evil is still to control his will and deprive him of his…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wright believed that the similarities between Israel and her neighbors are “accidentals”. He and others believed that while there were similarities, they were not important. Oswalt gives the example of both groups worshiping in temples, but the Israelites not having idols in their temple. The major difference between the two is how the God or gods is identified. The surrounding areas of Israel know gods through nature, while Israel knows God through man and their experience with Him. The truthfulness of scripture is challenged today but skeptical people who present the question, “Did the things presented in the Old Testament really occur?” If scripture is written by man, can we trust it to be true? This also raises the issue of how this theology came to be within the Israelites if it is false. When asked this question, they say they did not make up this theology, but that it was given to them by God himself. He gave them the understanding…

    • 5411 Words
    • 155 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Grace Janizen’s “Whose Problem Is the ‘Problem of Evil’”, she points out the philosophers spent too much trying to answer why God created a world with evil in it and not answering more important questions. She starts off by saying that people spend too much on the matter whether good is too God to create a world with evil in it. She also explains the type of people that try to explain evil in the world, the veil of soul-making who believe that evil helps people become a better person. The other type is the free-will defense is God can only do logical things, but a world filled with evil is not very logical. Instead she feels that people should focus on other questions like if God allowed there to evil then should we really try fit those…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ben Parker once said, "With great power, comes great responsibility". Mankind has tremendous power, and this power is called free will. Free will has been defined by many philosophers as the choices made with no ulterior motif, however, philosophers Frelor Dostoevsky and Richard Swinburne can both agree it involves the malicious or benign choices of mankind impacting one another. This great power of free will, has the potential to equally harm an individual as well as help them. Both philosophers published literary works to convey their own individual perspective of evil, and how free will plays a part in the presence of evil. Despite the misconceptions of God's omnipotence, the presence of evil within the world is a product of humans using…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After several years of work in Uganda with children in jails, Goff received a phone call, which he believed was a joke, to become the american counsel for the Republic of Uganda. Goff was shocked by the offer and was unsure if this was a good job for him to accept at that point in his life. He thought that he could continue mission trips, donations, and ministry instead of being the counsel. He prayed and realized that there was a greater reasoning behind this offer and God would not have placed him in the position without a plan. Goff accepted the offer realizing he was called to love the Ugandans and say, “we were all meant to save lives; God is always trying to save lives and he uses the least likely people to do it” (Goff 66). Goff learned through this experience that the devil constantly tries to twist one’s own thoughts to take the easier path. If Goff had declined the offer and continued mission trips and donating instead, he would have been taking the easy route and avoiding God’s plan. He would have still been helping people, but not for the right reasons, which is fulfilling God’s purpose. God calls the most unlikely people to do the most extraordinary things. Sometimes, people are called to do things that flip their whole life upside down. Deciding to put oneself in vulnerable situations is a hard to do because people do not want to be in a situation where they could fail, but God will not put someone in a position that will destroy him. Many people believe in goodness through works, but goodness is only achieved when fulfilling Christ’s purpose in one’s life. Choosing the easy path does not stretch one’s character or growth, but choosing the right path comes with great reward in heaven, but no always on earth. Striving to be like God and live out his plan impacts people…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The problem of evil refers to the question of how to reconcile the existence of evil with an omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent God.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Any war is a result of this evil inside us. If this evil didn't exist, then there would have been no need for war. We…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evil can be used in two ways- when someone has done evil and when someone has suffered evil. Since God is good, God does no moral evil; however, because God is just, God punishes the wicked and thus causes the evil of punishment. People are the cause of their own evildoing. Furthermore, because learning is good a thing, we do not learn evil. It is people’s inordinate desires that drive their evildoings.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Initially, Wright introduces common misconceptions regarding 'The ultimate Christian hope'. He wastes no time in answering the first question by implying that the ultimate Christian hope is the new heavens and the new earth. Wright adamantly refuses to accept the…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probably the most powerful reason against the existence of The Classical God of Theism (hereafter referred to as God) is evil and suffering in the world. The problem of evil is an ‘a posterori’ argument, established from experience based on empirical senses. It is also synthetic as evil and suffering can be seen around us daily. There are a number of possible reasons for the problem of evil and why it causes a problem for religious believers, making it an inductive argument also. In his book Philosophy of Religion John Hick defined evil and suffering as “physical pain, mental suffering and moral wickedness”…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persuasive Paper

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “The universe is a good creation of God, and sees no evil in it. It is a cosmos-an orderly harmonious system. However, there are indications that he sees the universe in its infancy, complete in every form but growing to perfection and immortally. In the lord of the flies by William Golding, the beast in the boys on the island was their alter ego which is in everyone. I think mankind is essentially good because everyone is born good not evil. Then at the same time we have that alter ego that lures us into the bad. But as you can see I will have willing proof on how mankind is good not bad.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays