Preview

Much Ado and Richard Iii

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Much Ado and Richard Iii
Much Ado About Nothing & RIII

Mcuh Ado About Nothing and RIII, written by William Shakespeare, have characters that greatly impact the story and the destruction in the plays. In Much Ado About Nothing we have Don John; a bastard child whom finds pleasure in plotting against others and finding any way to manipulate others into believing events that have not actually occurred. Don John operates as a plot-device as opposed to an actual character. He gives us a little speech about how he is a bad guy and enjoys being a bad guy, but there is not much that we can say about him because we never really know his motivations, or even his reaction to all of the chaos he has caused. In the end, he ran off before he can even be punished or have a warm, fuzzy change of heart scene. He is definitely not Shakespeare’s most compelling and complex villain. Although, it is not a failing of Shakespeare’s that this villain is so bland. It is actually a reminder to the reader that the play is not supposed to be a tragedy, and is not even supposed to really analyze evil at all. The more important take-home points of the play are about mirth and the folly of misunderstanding. In RIII, we find Richard; a conniving, evil, and manipulative trickster who causes all of the trouble in the play. In RIII, Richard is plotting against everyone in order to gain control of the thrown. The first glimpse of his conniving personality is from the very first scene in act one. “To set my brother Clarence and the King In deadly hate the one against the other” (I.i.34-35). This portion of Richard’s opening speech specifically details part of his plan to take the title as King. In this quote it is evident that Richard is going to instill death upon others in order to take what he wants. This opening speech details important aspects of who he is. He explains that he cannot be happy. The reason for his unhappiness though is only because he believes that a woman would not want any sexual



Cited: “Much Ado About Nothing.” – Synopsis by William Shakespeare. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Mar. 2013. Shakespeare, William, and Tucker Brooke. Much Ado About Nothin. New Haven: Yale UP, lllll1917. Print. Shakespeare, William, P.A. Daniel, and Charles Praetorius. Richard III. London: Produced by C. lllllPraetorius, 1889. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intrinsic to both texts, there is the notion that art is used to directly influence and impact existing historical perceptions. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” explores this idea, using the most influential artistic medium of the time, theatre, to further publicise the ‘Tudor Myth’ perception. On stage, the visual motif of Richard’s appearance as “deformed, unfinished” reflects his moral deficiencies, reinforced by his soliloquys and asides that expose his underlying treachery. He forges a duplicitous role as both director and actor within the play, stating in the opening soliloquy “plots that I have laid, inductions dangerous…” Richard seemingly ‘stage manages’ the entirety of his world, creating a sense of dramatic irony from the juxtaposing of the different “masks” he feigns in contrast to his true intentions; he plays the role of the “grieving” brother, “Christian prince,” etc. As such, Richard’s meta-theatricality engages us on a psychological level that reinforces the perception of the Tudor Myth given not just the heinous nature of his crimes but the “villainous”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I attended the Sunday matinee of the Nevada Conservatory Theatre’s production of “Much Ado About Nothing.” It was, overall, an extremely well done performance, from the acting, to the costumes, but as with any piece of art not without it’s faults.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reflecting Elizabethan moral absolutes, Shakespeare acknowledges that a capacity for deception, manipulation and the quest for power is central to the human condition and clearly delineates the complex nature of evil in the character of Richard. Shakespeare dramatically portrays Richard’s villainous intentions and motivations to the Elizabethan audience in the opening soliloquy announcing- “he is made villain” to “usurp” the throne like a symbolic “usurping boar” being physically and morally “deformed” by his craving for power. Subsequently, Richard uses his guises as a tool for deception; he is a passionate lover desperately “wooing Lady Anne” yet a conniving murderer killing her husband, also ironically appearing to be a “loyal loving brother” by eradicating “George” himself. Shakespeare then reaffirms the results of human’s corruption and insatiability for power to the Elizabethan audience as he “proves a villain” must “fall prey to his” own “subtle and treacherous”…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book Much Ado About Nothing is a surprisingly fascinating story. Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare is similar to his other work in which people fall in love. In this story people cause problems to break relationships and love apart. Nevertheless true love finds its way back. What makes Much Ado About Nothing unique is trickery and deceit plays a huge roll in romance.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plot of Much Ado About Nothing is based upon deliberate deceptions, some malevolent and others benevolent that functions the main and sub plot. But also Deceptions are used by Shakespeare to reveal a lot about characters and attitudes.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the play, Much Ado About Nothing, there is a central theme of deceitfulness, as a way to solve a problem or an issue amongst the characters. Though deception is inherently perceived as evil, it led to positive endings after several conflicts throughout the play. In the creation of this theme, Shakespeare uses both negative and positive examples to contribute to his lesson on ruses. Within this particular scene, all of the cons that the various characters have put on are officially disclosed to each other. This scene highlights that deception is not always evil, nor is it always moral, but can be means to an end that can be beneficial or detrimental to a character’s arc. Shakespeare’s use of honesty within this particular scene, establishes the deconstruction of illusions within human relationships in order to complete a story.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Much Ado about Nothing is a dramatic comedy written by Shakespeare between 1598-1599 and published in 1623. During the Elizabethan era, women were raised to believe they were inferior to men. The quote “Women in her greatest perfection was made to serve and obey man” was written by a protestant leader of the time, who believed this was the way Elizabethan women should act. Stereotypically, women were expected to be very domestic and seen as less worthy compared to males. Shakespeare’s character ‘Hero’ in Much Ado about Nothing is the perfect example of the expectations of Elizabethan women. Her polite and submissive attitude portrays her as vulnerable and dominated by her father. However, the other…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Napierkowski, Marie Rose. "Twelfth Night: One-Page Summary." Shakespeare for Students. Vol. 0. Detroit: Gale, 1998. 1 March 2005 .…

    • 2191 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Ii

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Richard II, by William Shakespeare, is a play about a King whom is a poor chose in spending his countries wealth, separated from his subjects, and makes unwise decisions for counsel. Richard II then begins to lease land to wealthy noblemen and takes the money from a deceased uncle to fund his lifestyle the commoners and other noblemen become outraged. In the play there are symbolisms to England as being like “Eden”; and the first symbolism and maybe one of the most significant ones is by John of Gaunt in Act 2, scene 1, lines 31-68. After Gaunt’s symbolic reference to England as a garden there are other symbolisms towards gardens referenced throughout the play along that aid in Shakespeare’s use of imagery.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He is driven only by his own will. This will is simply to have unlimited power – Richard wants to become king, and for this, he is able to do anything, even when it comes to killing. And he kills a lot: there is quite a high number of people before him who would become king if the current one dies, so he has to eliminate each and every of them to make sure that the crown finally lands on his head. And he does a great job: he is far the cleverest person in the play: he plans each and every step one by one, and successfully carries his plan out afterwards. He doesn’t realize, however, that he is just another card in the hands of history. At that time, England, and especially the ruling family of England was rotten. Deep down in corruption, hypocrisy, there is not a single character that we could feel sorry for – and Richard is the one who makes order, cleans the scum, before a new order can come. That’s why, when he finally becomes the King of England, he is lost. He has played so many roles, that he just can’t switch back to being himself. Actually there never has been a Richard himself as he always played roles, acted, and disguised everybody. He is the cleverest of all, but he has a lack of conscience. A king has to represent the whole country with his strong identity, and Richard does not have an identity at…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He was involved with lots of murders including lots of his family. These corrupt actions let the critics label Richard III as a villain. Murders of innocent people is not an action exclusive to a terrible hero such as Richard III. Peoples commonly accepted as terrible heroes such as Othello, Macbeth, and Hamlet also murdered innocent characters because of their ways. All of these people has been charged with murder innocent people. But, they are still accepted as terrible heroes. There should not be any difficulty in accepting Richard III as a horrible hero who commits many murders of innocent characters because of psychotic ways. Indeed, Richard III does commit many evil acts in the play—but these evil acts do not hold him back him from qualifying as an Aristotelian tragic hero. Richard III is a man of great image who suffers a breakdown due to his awful behavior proves he’s the villain. Richard III’s behavior are also the result of tragic hurt and evilness family and peers had towards him. The family was so worried that he was going to get killed when he treated people so bad. His peers tried to be there for Richard but he was a hard person to get alone with despite his evil ways. Richard III could have had a better life as a hero and not been characterized as the bad guy. He never wanted to be consider the hero because he was rich and powerful being that he was the king. He wanted to make sure he was killing everyone off so that he can stay sitting on the throne. When you a king you don’t want no one else to take your position. Some people become jealous and go on a really bad rage like Richard. Richard although he seems even somewhere had to have a heart of love. But, he didn’t want to show it. Richard wanted to stay killing people to make his self-look good bad to stay popular as the villain. He knew that with him being thinking he could do what…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Masks in Twelfth Night

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: William Shakespeare. "Twelfth Night." The Norton anthology of English literature. 9th ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2012. 1189-1250…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Love and Othello

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Human identity is one of the complex sides of human beings. Because there is no single identity, it is an unsoluble issue. People are different in terms of their natures. This has been one of the important elements that writers use in their works for years. William Shakespeare was one of them. He analyzed human identity very well and shaped his characters according to his researches. His analysis of humankinds are well-presented in his tragedies. Even though they have bad deeds, tragic characters in Shakespearean plays are not evil in their natures. Most scholars agree that being tragic does not mean being cruel and evil. R. N. Hallstead and John Arthos mention innocent and pure soul of Othello in their articles. This theory can be analyzed with the help of one of the important characters in one of the important plays by William Shakespeare: Othello, The Moor of Venice.…

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays