Preview

Mrs Birling Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1009 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mrs Birling Analysis
Priestly uses Mrs. Birling’s character to represent snobby rich people of the era and makes use of language, form and structure to develop her character throughout the course of Act II.
Mrs. Birling, right off the back, gives the audience an impression of ‘a classic snob’. She thinks she is morally and socially superior and tries to show this on several occasions. ‘I don’t suppose for a moment that we can understand why the girl committed suicide. Girls of that class-’, ‘As if a girl of that sort would refuse money.’ She is very well-aware of the differences between social classes. Another example of this, although not in Act II, is when she gets irritated at Mr. Birling for praising the cook which for her is probably a social mistake.
…show more content…
Birling is telling her part of the story, she refuses to take responsibility and blames others. ‘Mrs Birling: (agitated now) Oh, stop it, both of you. And please remember before you start accusing me of anything again that it wasn't I who had her turned out of her employment – which probably began it all.’ ‘Mrs Birling: ... Simply because I've done nothing wrong – and you know it.’ ‘... But I accept no blame for it at all.’ All of this shows that she is unapologetic for what she has done and accepts no responsibility for her actions. She blames others instead.
The general form and structure of the play enhances Mrs. Birling’s character to an extent. By placing her second last in the line of enquiry, the impact of her actions is greater on the victim than other characters. She enters amidst a dramatic pause, when Sheila is trying to examine the Inspector, ‘…I don’t understand about you...’ to which the Inspector says, ‘There’s no reason why you should’. This adds on to the audience’s curiosity making them think what’s to come.
All in all, Priestly presents Mrs. Birling as a cold, self-absorbed, patronising, rich woman of the era, who sees the lower class as morally inferior. She is unremorseful and impenitent for what happened to Eva Smith and despite playing a part in her death refuses to take any responsibilities for her actions and blames others instead. She is very mindful of how the society views her and has a very vile

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As soon as they meet in act one, Birling attempts to show his social superiority to the Inspector, boasting about his contacts in the police force, this shows Birlings character and the type of person he is, big headed and boastfull. Within the play Mr and Mrs Birling seems to be the only characters that are unable to accept the fact that they helped in the death of eva smith. In contrast to Mr and Mrs Birling Sheila has total opposite views and realises what she did was wrong, and wishes that she could go back and never get Eva sacked-…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Mr Birling was the employer of Eva Smith and he fired her just because she was taking part in a petition for a pay rise, eventually starting the chain of events that lead to the death of the innocent Eva. It’s evident that Mr Birling is not the main reason of Eva’s suicide, however he passively contributed in it. Plus when questioned by the Inspector, Mr Birling continues to be stubborn and arrogant and argues that he is completely guiltless. This fact is quite obvious when he declares himself that “still” he cannot accept any responsibility.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.B Priestley was born in Bradford, Yorkshire on 13th September 1894. He firm believer of socialism which is a political theory or system in which the means of production and distribution are controlled by the people therefore he disagrees firmly with capitalism. Priestley set his play in 1912 because the date symbolized an period when all was very unusual from the time he was writing. In 1912, inflexible class and gender restrictions seemed to guarantee that nothing would change. However by 1945 the majority of class and gender divisions had been infringed. Priestley wanted to make the most of these changes. The Inspector wants to teach the Birling Family to care about other and not only themselves and he wants to show that social status and wealth are not significant factors. One of Priestley’s major concerns was that even that the war has ended people were living in poverty and living depressed lives. I think that J.B Priestley is trying to tell people that they shouldn’t rejoice after the war because several people have been killed. Priestley shows that there shouldn’t be a division between people of different class. In 1912 the Birling family lead a comfortable life Birling is a prime example of a capitalist, J.B Priestley is keen to highlight the selfishness of him in the play. J.B Priestley wanted to highlight what was right and wrong in society as it is a morality play .In this essay I am going to investigate how J.B Priestley uses dramatic devices to intrigue the audience.…

    • 820 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In act one Priestly presents Shelia Birling using a variety of techniques. Firstly, during the beginning of the act, Priestly uses stage directions to present Sheila as a half-joking character with the stage direction ‘[half serious, half playful]’ to show that although the conversation may be sincere she beings a lightness to the atmosphere. In addition, another stage direction ‘[mocking aggressions]’ also indicates this half-joking, half-genuine characteristic and shows that Sheila adds the humour and sarcasm to the conversation in to room to insure it don’t become too firm. However, towards the ending of the act Sheila hears about the girl’s death which causes her ‘mocking’ side to disintegrates and the stage directions change to ‘[distressed]’ and ‘[agitated]’to show that this girls horrible death has touched Sheila and she concerned about the outcome of the investigation.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Birlings are a family of wealth and power, who take pride in their high social position. Mr. Birling is a successful businessman, and the family inhabits a nice home with a maid (and likely other servants). The play begins with the family celebrating and feeling generally pleased with themselves and their fortunate circumstance. Throughout the Inspector’s investigation, however, it comes out that several of the Birlings have used their power and influence immorally, in disempowering and worsening the position of a girl from a lower class: Mr. Birling used his high professional position to force Eva Smith out of his factory when she led a faction of workers in demanding a raise; Sheila, in a bad temper, used her social status and her family’s…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheila Birling Changes

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An Inspector Calls is a definitive play written by J.B Priestley. It explores the many themes that wove through society before the first world war, such lack of social responsibility, social disparity between different classes and the gap of understanding and contemplating between the two dissimilar generations – the young and the old. In this essay, I will be exploring the character Sheila Birling and how and why does she change in the play, in response to the Inspector and to her family.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Mrs Birling- I blame the young man who was the father of the child she was…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This will help everyone to create more social equality and lower the differences between classes. Priestley's purpose in writing the play was to inform others that they must think about the consequences of their actions. He did this as what one person does can affect many people, such as in 'An Inspector Calls' Mr Birling action of firing Eva Smith led to many other events. Priestley’s purpose in writing the play links to the contrasts, especially that of the differences in classes and how people are treated differently. For example with Eva Smith being treated as a lesser person to Mr. Birling. It also links to the themes of responsibility verses selfishness. As if Mr. Birling or Sheila had taken responsibility for their original actions then Eva Smith would not as been as likely to commit suicide in the end. Priestley wrote the play to fall into the genre of a 'whodunit', he also wrote…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Emma and Clueless

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The main characters, Emma and Cher are representational products of their society and parallels can be drawn in the opening scenes, particularly in relation to self-knowledge. The Bildungsroman progression from delusion to social awareness is a universal value in both texts despite their differing contexts. Emma is introduced as “handsome, clever, and rich” who had “a disposition to think a little too well of herself.” Austen’s satirical tone as the omniscient narrator alerts the responder to Emma’s inability to understand her position in society. Furthermore, while Emma successfully matches Mr. Weston and Ms. Taylor, her motives are superficial as she sees it as “the greatest amusement in the world!” She also believes Harriet’s beauty “should not be wasted on the inferior society”, and it would be “interesting and highly becoming” to “improve her”. Austen employs verbal irony through Emma’s dialogue, which exposes her flaws of arrogance and shallowness. However, Emma eventually develops self awareness as shown when she realizes her mistake of matching Harriet with Mr. Elton and influencing her to refuse a suitable marriage with Mr. Martin.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.B Priestly portrays Mr. Arthur Birling as an arrogant, hard-headed, selfish capitalist who is only concerned about his reputation. Priestley intentionally exaggerates this character to corroborate his own political agenda. Birling’s thoughts towards socialist ideologies about the significance of community is ‘nonsense’ and that “a man has to make his own way”. This indicates that he has no interest whatsoever in social responsibility – through his business or his family. In Act One, Mr Birling dictates his predictions for what he thinks is going to happen in the future. He states that “The world’s developing so fast it’ll make war impossible.” the readers already know that World War I and II have already taken place. Furthermore, he says that the Titanic is ‘absolutely unsinkable’; the audience already know that t he Titanic has sunk. Moreover, he believes that there will be ‘peace and prosperity and rapid progress everywhere’. To the audience of 1945, this character would have been viewed as laughably optimistic and…

    • 365 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    GCSE INSPECTOR CALLS

    • 827 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Towards the end of the play, priestly gives us the impression that Sheila has been influenced by the inspectors morals greatly, as when they are discussing as a family on how to act with the possibility that the inspector isn’t really an inspector. Sheila is presented as of less importance within the Birling hierocracy due to the fact of Sheila being a woman and due to the society at the time; Sheila presents “I behaved badly to. I know I did. I am ashamed of it. But now you’re beginning all over again to pretend that nothing much has happened” Mr Birling replies “Nothing much has happened!” Priestly has Sheila represent a…

    • 827 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    An Inspector Calls

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The plot is one of the main means used to highlight the theme of social responsibility. The play begins with an engagement party which takes place in the Birling household. This is interrupted by a mysterious Inspector who brings the news that a young woman has committed suicide, and the accusation that every character is somewhat responsible for her demise. Each of the characters is interrogated in turn, and as the story unfolds it is revealed that indeed, every character has, in some way, caused her to take her life. None of these are deliberate attempts, but have affected her all the same; showing that, as Mr Birling says, “Community and all that nonsense” intertwines our lives with people of all standing and fortunes. The Birling family must act with a strong moral conscience, as their actions can result in drastic consequences for their fellow human beings.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inspector Calls

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mr and Mrs Birling do not understand that they have taken part in killing Eva smith, they have no empathy for her and are incapable of change. After the inspector informs Mr Birling that Eva Smith has died an agonising death Mr Birling is incredibly insensitive towards the situation and is very flippant, “Yes, yes. Horrid business.” Mr Birling is stubborn, and does not want to put his pride on hold to accept his responsibility, “Still, I can’t accept any responsibility.” Through the character of Mr Birling Priestly conveys that the upper class have a narrow view of what it means to be responsible, all Birling thinks it means to be responsible to make a success of his business. Mrs Birling is no more mature towards responsibility than Mr Birling, “Simply because I have done nothing wrong.” Mrs Birling has no remorse and does not feel like she had any part to play in killing Eva.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play implicitly draws out a significant contrast between the older and younger generations of Birlings. While Arthur and Sybil refuse to accept responsibility for their actions toward Eva Smith (Arthur, in particular, is only concerned for his reputation and his potential knighthood), Eric and especially Sheila are shaken by the Inspector’s message and their role in Eva Smith’s suicide. The younger generation is taking more responsibility, perhaps because they are more emotional and idealistic, but perhaps because Priestley is suggesting a more communally responsible socialist future for Britain.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social class importance

    • 1075 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Priestly criticizes a large number of the beliefs commonly held by the stereotypical upper class around the early 19th century. For example, many of the rich thought that they were obviously the best people because they had power and glory. This led them to believe that they were actually higher quality humans along with being better off than the lower classes.. Priestly tries to destroy this particular idea by having a cast with poor and rich, but with the poor being decidedly better than the rich, from a moral point of view at least. The upper class Birlings would be expected to be problem-free and blameless in any scandal, but this is not the case. And Eva, who as a low-class girl would be expected to “Get into trouble” by those better off than her, decided not to. In fact, the only trouble Eva ever gets into is to come into contact with the Birlings!…

    • 1075 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays