Preview

Mr Timur

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1693 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mr Timur
Is nuclear power the best alternative to fossil fuels for the future energy needs of the UK?

There are different types of fuel such as coal, gas, wind energy, solar energy, oil and nuclear energy which is considered to be the most important source for the future. Our fossil fuel resources have been developed to provide us with many necessary things such as food, consumer goods, dwelling, transportation, but at the same time they are vanishing, hour after hour and something should be done. There are many types of energy which are used in our society but having analyzed all the presented materials on the topic, I can say that nuclear energy is one of the ways out for the UK and I would like to prove that. According to BNFL much of the energy we use today in our developing world has come from fossil fuels which enable us to provide lighting and heating in our homes, offices and factories. (2001, p44-45). We got used to the benefits from these sources and forgot about the alarming effects on our personal lives and devastating effect on our commercial and industrial output. Having studied all possible electricity sources, we can underline that they all depend on various circumstances. However, we have some ways out of the situation and one of them is the development of the nuclear power.

Let me start by saying that all renewables such as solar energy, wind mills, tidal energy and some others are limited in our world and that is why it is very difficult to rely on them in the future. For example, there is no wind and all wind mills stop working or there are cloudy days in winter and no solar energy, such examples can be numerous. However, according to the government figures in the guardian article, energy from the renewables has risen on 40% in such countries as Sweden, Finland and Denmark (Jha, 2009). As the United Nations declared, government started to invest more money into the renewables as they are considered to be cleaner than all other sources of



Bibliography: Adam, D., 2006. Nuclear power cannot tackle climate change. The Guardian [online] Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/jan/17/nuclearindustry.energy [Accessed on 02.11.2012] British Nuclear Fuels, 2001. Energy for life. In: C. Donellan, ed. 2001. Issues: The Energy Debate. Cambridge: Independence, pp. 44-45. Cambridge University, 2012. The future of energy [video] Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/video/2012/jul/27/future-energy-video [Accessed on 02.11.2012] Hollins, P. 2001. Why nuclear energy has to be part of the solution. In: C. Donellan, ed. 2001. Issues: The Energy Debate. Cambridge: Independence, pp. 52-53. Jha, A., 2009. Q&A: Renewable energy. The Guardian [online]. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jul/16/renewable-energy [Accessed on 02.11.2012] May, Lord, 2004. The nuclear option. In: C. Donellan, ed. 2005. Issues: Energy Matters. Cambridge: Independence, pp. 21-22.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Due by Day 7 . Nuclear Power . All energy sources have drawbacks. Even the clean hydropower option has negative ramifications. Weigh those against the possible consequences of developing nuclear power, a controversial alternative to fossil fuels. Discuss the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster as well as the 20th century Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in drawing conclusions about risk versus reward of nuclear energy use. The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least one ...…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a society grows and develops, there are many issues the people must face during the process. One of the most important problems modern civilizations must solve is where and how they get their energy. In our day and age, we rely heavily on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil. Patrick Moore, a writer for the Washington Post, composes an argument for nuclear power and recommends that it should be the future for all things energy. Moore’s argument is a convincing article that would most likely pull many neutral readers to see his side very clearly. The article gives all the pros to the uses of nuclear energy, and does an excellent job of addressing all possible counter-arguments.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Todd H. Otis, A Review Of Nuclear Energy in the United States: Hidden Power, (New York, NY: Praeger Publishers,…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today's world where technology and advancements has flourished, majority comes to one main source to run on… Energy. There is several alternative methods on producing energy, some more efficient or safer than others. The most common and traditional source of energy in today's world is coal power, but other alternatives do exist such as that of natural gas, solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is the 3rd most common source of our energy. Nuclear energy was first introduced in 1954 in Russia with the first power plant. Nuclear energy provides about 20% of today's electricity and does provide a substantial amount of energy, but does provide threats of radioactivity.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nucleat Power in Australia

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Currently, an increasing number of countries have developed nuclear power and adopted nuclear power as their main source of power. However, not all countries support the development of nuclear power. A great deal of residents concerns which have swept across much of the developed world was caused by the growing nuclear industry overseas (Falk ,Green & Mudd 2006).In Australia, nuclear power is not used due to the worries about safety and pollution, but some experts point out that the perception about nuclear power should change, because it is possible that the use of electricity in Australia will double during the period from 2040 to 2050 relative to what it is today (Switkowski 2007).Opinions on whether Australia should adopt nuclear power as main source of power are divided. The controversy has become more heated following the growing concerns that traditional energy is running out. A majority of individuals tend to insist that Australia should not develop nuclear power. However, this essay will discuss that Australia should adopt nuclear power for several reasons: the raw materials of nuclear power, uranium, is abundant in Australia, and to a large extent, nuclear power is more environmentally-friendly and it can bring a lot of economic benefits for Australia, furthermore, the safety concerns are being addressed more effectively over time.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    * Discuss the scientific and technical concepts related to the use of nuclear power as an energy resource. Address the following in your response:…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eart Science Review

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Suppose an electric-generating power plant is about to be built near your house. The local government has not decided whether to allow coal, nuclear, or oil as fuel for the plant (natural gas is not an option). Some groups argue coal is the best choice because there is a 200-year supply and using coal reduces our dependence on foreign oil. Critics argue that burning coal produces three times more global-warming gasses than oil. Coal also produces more dust and expels more acid-rain-causing gases than oil. Others argue that nuclear-generated power produces no greenhouse gases and no other atmospheric pollution. Critics argue that there is presently no long-term location to store the radioactive waste that will be generated and question the safety of nuclear power. Over the life of the plant, nuclear is the least expensive option, followed by coal and then oil.…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today there are so many countries and governments that have realized that nuclear energy is the only way to significantly decrease their emissions. The world economy is producing greenhouse emissions at the…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have discovered countless energy sources, from fossil fuel combustion to nuclear fission and fusion, each of which have seemed to pose a different problem. Whether the problematic effect seems to be cost or carbon dioxide emission, renewable and nonrenewable resources have both seemed to come with a fair set of cons with their pros. Extensive research on the topic has shown that there seems to be no flawless source of energy extraction, however there certainly are sources that are relatively worse than others. This being said, nuclear energy, from the fusion and fission of radioactive elements, is one of the worst sources of energy because of its immense waste, danger to the general public, and large expenses.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sovacool, Benjamin K. “Nuclear Energy and Renewable Power: Which is the Best Climate Change Mitigation Option?” Proceedings of World Academy of Science: Engineering & Technology 39: 758-762. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Dec. 2009. <http://search.ebscohost.com/‌login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=40086266&site=ehost-live>.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    the recent growth in production of natural gas, and the clear benefits of nuclear energy it…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paul L. Joskow & John E. Parsons. “The Future of Nuclear Power After Fukushima”. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. (2012): 1-30.…

    • 3083 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    living wastes known to man. The technology to safely dispose of this waste has yet to…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    solar energy paper

    • 1239 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nersesian, R. L. (2007). Energy for the 21st Century: A Comprehensive Guide to Conventional and Alternative Sources. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays