Mr. Milowski's Essay On Civil War Journalism

Strengths Mr. Milowski’s essay on Civil War journalism has several distinct strengths throughout its length. First and foremost, Mr. Milowski made three very wise decisions in the newspapers he choose to examine in his essay. By choosing three newspapers from the capital cities of London, Richmond, and Washington D.C., Mr. Milowski was able to juxtapose the journalism in England with that of the Confederacy and the Union. Therefore, he was able to highlight a disparity in coverage on like events. This formed the backbone of his essay as he was able to explain how these newspapers routinely reported a version of events shaped by the newspaper articles authors’ desires and not that of the actual political situation. This worked well to prove
Milowski’s essay was his use of secondary and primary sources. In particular, Mr. Milowski used primary sources with pronounced alacrity. Each primary source was figured into the essay in such a manner as to highlight the differences between actual events and perceived events. Moreover, each primary source worked well on building his case that the journalists were not writing in accordance with actual events. The sources actually built open each other to strengthen his essay. Also, Mr. Milowski carefully selected which excerpts to use. In this fashion, he was able to illustrate disparities between his primary sources. Thus, this helped to strengthen his central argument by proving differences between the newspapers. The third strength to Mr. Milowski’s essay was his ability to use secondary sources to detail the prevailing disjointedness between the political climate of the era and the articles written about recognition of the Confederacy. Furthermore, he used these secondary sources alongside the primary sources as a way to explain the backdrop to the primary sources. Therefore, his use of secondary sources served as a buttress supporting the main sources of evidence in his essay.
Areas for Possible