Preview

Moving forward

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
269 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moving forward
The purpose of this integrated discussion is to discuss the limitations of traditional strategic choice models. Description of Theories/Core Concepts The strategic choice approach is a perspective that is based on individual choice models, which focuses on various decision making strategies. Strategic choice models have two main components: choice and strategy. For choice, the models stresses discretion and that choice is influenced by context. For strategy, the model observes the liklihood of achieving a goal through series of actions or assessments. Analysis/Explanation/Discussion Within all organizations, managers are responsible for the direction of the organization and for effective decision making strategies. Managers utilize a host of techniques that will move the organization forward. However, despite the overall popularity of the technique used by management, the success rate is limited by the reliability of the information supplied.
Strategic choice model suggests that managers tend to select strategies based on a specific goal and an individual response to a specific receiver (Shelby, 1991). According to Stacey (2011), strategic choice theory refers to a choice in reality, which relates to nature and human behavior. Managers who apply a strategic choice model to their decision will attain a feasible and realistic solution. Strategic choice theory and rational choice theory are similar. Both theories focus on naturalism and positivism. However, rational choice theory is largely used for political decisions and strategic choice theory is mainly used by business managers. Overall, both theories make assumptions about the limitations in human behavior and agree that human behavior is unpredictable.
Conclusion
In my opinion, strategic choice theory does not focus on the emotional side of human behavior.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Coke Wars Case Study

    • 3862 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The text describes strategic management as “the set of decisions and actions that result in the formulation and implementation of plans designed to achieve a company’s objectives” (Pearce, Robinson pg 3). With this definition in mind then, the Strategic Management Model can be considered as a very useful framework by which managers plan and implement business strategies. More importantly, in today’s global business environment “firms need perfect processes that respond to increases in the size and number of competing firms; to the expanded role of…

    • 3862 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    According to Macmillan et al (2000), "choice and strategic choice refer to the process of selecting one for implementation."…

    • 2418 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory says that we are choosing to commit a crime (Schmalleger, 2011). For example, a person has very little income and has a bill due. This person sits back and thinks of ways to come up with the money. Ultimately this person decides the only way to get the money is to commit robbery. Using the rational choice theory this person chose to commit the crime and must now deal with the consequences. The rational choice theory also states that the person who chooses to commit the crime feels the gain from the crime is far better than the repercussions of ignoring the law (Schmalleger, 2011). The rational choice theory is part of neoclassical criminology. Neoclassical criminology says that we are the ones who choose to commit crimes or choose to abide by the law (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first major Theory was The Expected Utility Theory, which indicates that individuals are likely to choose the decision that is the most valuable, but although this is true, this theory can account for unnecessary risk taking, which in turn can cause an unwanted outcome. The Prospect theory on the other hand accounts for certain biases within decision making however this does not take into account other aspects of decision making, such as the probability and other potential influences. The Social Functionalist Approach also shows that individuals are likely to feel pressured to make certain decisions, this may indicate that they are not making a decision based on what they believe, but rather what other people perceive as the correct decision. The Expected Utility Theory and Prospect Theory do show that although humans do appear to be rational decision makers in some sense, although this is not always the case, as there can be many things that can influence an individual’s decision, and due to this it is not possible to determine whether or not humans are indeed rational decision makers based entirely on…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Strategic decision making is when decisions are made to determine the long term direction of an organisation at the highest level within the organisation. According to Gregory Hamel (Hamel, G. 2008) (Small business, 2012) Strategic decision making is an on-going process that involves creating strategies to achieve goals and altering strategies based on observed outcomes.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other theories about how humans make decisions are hard determinism and soft determinism. Hard determinism describes the decision-making process based solely on determinism and not free will; whereas, soft determinism is uses both determinism and free will as its support. These other theories about free will both use the idea of determinism as a main source of support for decision-making. Not using determinism is a spurious negative of the theory of libertarianism, because it does not allow prior factors to have any impact on decision-making.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The strategic choice perspective in the study of organizations and considers its contemporary contribution. It is one of the logical elements of the strategy formulation process while ‘choice’ is at the centre of the strategy formulation. This theory is built on an idea of interaction in which organizations adapt to their environment in a self-regulating and negative-feedback manner to achieve their goals. Good strategic choices have to be challenging enough to keep ahead of competitors but also have to be achievable.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Davenport, T. H. (2009). Make Better Decisions. Harvard Business Review, 87 (11), 117-123. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moving Forward

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I won’t go back, I can’t go back, to the way it used to be…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The word “strategic” sounds like it should be used for some type of board game. I guess from a far it could be looked at like a board game. In a board game a person might be thinking one step at a time: while a strategic thinker has vision and mission on how things will turn out. A person might also be thinking why this has anything to do with the business world. Most people only relate the business world to money or massive layoffs. In this paper, I will dive into how HR management can be more strategic.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rational Choice Theory

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Rational choice theory has been driven from Liberal belief and economic theory. It depends upon underlying notion of rationality. Rationality in this case can be described as “individual make decision that maximises the utility they expect to derive from making choices”. Therefore individuals or institutions are informed and are capable at making a correct decision. The hypothesis of such theory is that individual acts in their self-interest without considerations for others. Such individuals are considered rational and calculating who seek to maximise their own advantage. The individuals have plenty of good information to make correct choice; the information comes from areas other than social, cultural or historical backgrounds. Partiality is relative, reasonable and mathematical techniques are…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moving Forward

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Change sometimes happens for a good reason, but other times, it makes a situation worse. Lauren Olamina, from the book Parable of the Sower, and Holden Caulfield, from the book Catcher in the Rye, are complete opposites of each other. Throughout their lives, they struggle with their disabilities and the way they think about change. Their individual disabilities take them in different directions; she embraces change and moves forward, while he defeats change and works against moving forward.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rational Actor Analysis

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alternatives/options: the rational actor must choose among a set of alternatives that shows in a particular situation. The state as a rational actor trying to pick each alternative option to maximize benefits and minimize costs received. According to Allison, the outcomes (policy) as a result of compromise among the actors. The ability and skill of the actors would determines the outcome of the decision process. In determine the alternative option, the rational choice use to decide what options will be taken by the actor. Rational choice theory attempts to provide an explanation regarding the best possible choice for decision makers. The action taken must relevant to the…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I can think of these examples that the Rational Choice Theory is applied: my membership in GMA’s Multi-Purpose Cooperative and participation in various volunteer activities. Cooperative I have joined GMA’s Multi-Purpose Cooperative since 2002 recognizing the optimum benefits from my savings versus the traditional bank savings deposit. Saving through COOP seems unfelt because it is deducted from our salary. It yields a much higher interest rate than bank. Besides, the total contribution can be withdrawn anytime without withholding tax; hence, it is readily available if needed, which is the very essence of savings. Our COOP has been giving annual cash dividends, the total profits from all its investments divided to its members based on our individual capital. Higher contribution means higher dividends. Because of this, I already maximized my monthly contribution so I can optimize what I can get out of my money. So far, dividends have been ranging from 6-8% per annum, much higher than banks. Other benefit that we enjoy through COOP is the cash or gadget/appliance loans, with adjustable terms of payment plus certain rebates. If I don’t apply for a loan, I still enjoy certain benefit from this activity i.e., the interests of those who availed of the loan are earnings of the COOP and COOP earnings mean mine and all other members. Recent additions to the benefits include college scholarships for dependents and insurance. These particular items I haven’t enjoyed yet but I feel secured that someday, I will be able to avail of these because of COOP. Aside from all of these, I can also build a strong social network together with several (if not all) COOP members. People connection is of course a lifetime benefit. Hence, joining COOP gives me both financial and social advantages. With the help of other members, I am able to optimize the value of my savings, something…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays