Motivation, Violent Or Nonviolent Revolutionary?

In this paper, will be compared and contrast the difference motivation, violent and nonviolent method, and the support of the two and one might agree or disagree with the different type of revolution. The motivation of Mao Tse-tung and Gandhi may have the violent and nonviolent method of success their goal, but motivation is the same, to the success of gaining an independence for there be love nation. Mao Tse-tung motivation has seen more like revenge, due to the unnecessary way that could cause both sides of the revolution deep trouble. Gandhi's passive resistance way is more influential to most people, with no weapon or cannot fight. Method of Mao Tse-tung is the violent revolutionary, he believes that it's the only way to success in a revolution. No kindness need to be shown, Mao suggests that kindness is a weakness. Gandhi, on the other hand, is a nonviolent revolutionary, he believes passive resistance will stop mankind suffering. Two of the signature method of fight through human history, but opposite from one another. The comparison from the text is more like violent and nonviolent, support will choose the method, which most suited to them depend on the countries which the group of revolution is on.
Independence is the support goal as well, to accomplish this goal the support will have to accompany with the group of people, that agreeable to a different perspective. Gandhi's passive resistance seems to achieve the independence more effectively, without losing any life. The passive resistance can be a long process, but worthy, and treat other with love will eventually come through. Mao Tse-tung's quick tactic, but the life of the support will not guarantee to see the independence of their prospective country. Violent cause death and death cause more death, which there will be no winner at the