Preview

Morality Opinion In Trop's Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
296 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Morality Opinion In Trop's Case Study
The plurality opinion in Trop gave content to the "evolving standards of decency" by examining, in the tradition of Weems, contemporary punishment practices of other jurisdictions. That expatriation was no longer authorized elsewhere was taken as a significant indication that it had become an outdated anomaly. The standards articulated by Trop, although technically accepted by only a plurality of four Justices, have subsequently been embraced by the full Court. In the 1972 landmark decision of Furman v. Georgia, the Court held that the eighth amendment, now clearly applicable to the states, prohibited the infliction of capital punishment under virtually all state statutes because unrestrained discretion in imposing the penalty had resulted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Furman v. Georgia case took place on January 17th of 1971. Two other death penalty cases were decided along with Furman; Jackson v. Georgia and Branch v. Texas. These cases concern the constitutionality of the death sentence for rape and murder convictions. During the trial, Furman claimed…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In conclusion, this note will show that the United States Supreme Court is likely to clarify its decision in Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991), and affirm the decision of the Florida courts to uphold the life sentence.4…

    • 3052 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court's proportionality jurisprudence is informed by objective evidence. This objective evidence comes from the laws enacted by state legislatures and the behavior of sentencing juries. In 1925, only 18 states authorized the death penalty for rape. In 1971, on the eve of the Court's Furman decision, only…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furman arose from the death sentences among them. Findings indicated that the right criteria were not provided to the juries in deciding to vote for the death penalty. However, the Supreme Court ruled out the three death sentences, making it clear that they consisted of cruel and unusual punishment and violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. “Justice William O. Douglas concluded that the death penalty was inconsistently and disproportionately applied to those who were economically and socially disadvantaged”. It was held that Furman rights had been violated. The court reasons for stating that Furman rights was violated constituted to the fact that there wasn’t any uniformity across states with regards to how certain people are treated and sentenced to death and later executed. The court also came up with many factors that indicated error, in the sense that many blacks are convicted and sentenced to death more than white people. The aftermath of this case caused many states to re-write their statutes for capital offense and also to change their death penalty as well as some of their criminal procedures to see to it that the death penalty were based on known procedure and punitive deterrent rather than racial disparity and discrimination or any other factor that will not be deemed fair to the society and especially African…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differences that are considered right and wrong. At this age he or she should know…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Furman vs. Georgia Furman was convicted of murder and two others for rape. “Juries had convicted Furman for murder and two other individuals for rape—all three were African American—and then imposed the death penalty.” (Source A). "Furman v. Georgia (1972)." American Government. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 19 Apr. 2010. . The three pleaded that the death penalty is against the eighth amendment, which prohibits any man from suffering cruel and unusual punishment, and when Furman and his counterparts case reached the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court ruled the death penalty unconstitutional. “So the Court ruled for the first time that capital punishment violated the Eighth Amendment.” “All executions were put on hold following the decision.”(Source B). Hinds, Maurine. Furman v. Georgia and the DEATH PENALTY DEBATE. Berkely Heights, NJ: Enslow Publishers, Inc., 2005. 79-80. Print. The significance of Furman v. Georgia is that this case was the first case that was ruled violating the Eighth amendment and that it halted…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morality and Case Study

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The case study presented is a young immigrant couple striving to better their lives in a country of opportunity. This couple has endured a hard-working life style to begin a new life as a young married couple in their own home. The problem that they encounter is that the young wife discovers she is pregnant, which may have been a joyous surprise to the couple, but an ultrasound revealed that the fetus has an abnormality of the absence of bilateral arm development and a 25% chance that the fetus may have Down syndrome. The dilemma is how the physician and young couple and family have differing beliefs of what it means to be human.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gregg V. Georgia 1976

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The primary question to be considered was if the imposition of the death sentence is prohibited under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments as "cruel and unusual" punishment. Similarly just a few years earlier in Furman v. Georgia (1972) it was ruled that capital punishment laws were violating the 8th and 14th amendments because they failed to prevent arbitrary ruling, and unpredictable application. However, between 1972 and 1976, 35 states passed new statutes authorizing the death penalty. This raises questions of whether a state's rights are being imposed, and should there be a national capital punishment standard, or should each state deal with the issue on an individual basis?…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics, Morality, and Integrity all have some of the same elements that defines a person character. Being trustworthy leads to other elements of integrity. Such as, helping to better the community and respecting authority as a Parole Officer shows honesty. Being fair is another element which shows integrity. How can you be a Parole Officer, but doesn`t treat everyone equally? Third, being able to take responsibility for your own actions and personal growth as a Parole Officer shows integrity, as well. If you basically blame all of your failures and lack of progress on others around you then that shows your character and you cannot exhibit integrity with others and your career if you cannot be honest to yourself. Ethics as a Parole Officer could…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1972, the United States Supreme Court made a declaration claiming that the obligation of carrying out capital punishment was a form of barbaric and abnormal punishment in direct violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. To exemplify the significance of their declaration to the American people, the Supreme Court began to reverse death sentence cases that were brought before them. This ruling by the Supreme Court is known as Furman v. George. Over the span of four years, lawmakers scrambled to create more civilized statutes in order to reinstate capital punishment. In 1976, the Supreme Court walked away from eliminating the death penalty in general. They decided that capital punishment did not unvaryingly infringe on the United States…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is a policy that is crucial to the continuity and uniformity of judicial interpretation of law providing a degree of certainty that like cases will be similarly treated. It allows every individual to be reasonably sure that they will be judged in a fair and consist manner. It speaks to the fundamental philosophy of equality under the law which is one of the founding pillars of the Founder’s vision. Despite having been refined over the twenty years prior to Gideon’s appeal the Betts decision continued to be one of debate and dispute, one the Supreme Court in 1963 thought worthy of review.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment of the Constitution reads: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” Since the wording in this amendment is general in regards to what is cruel and unusual punishment, the Court was left to decide whether they would adopt a strict constitutional perspective consistent with the framer’s definitions of “cruel and unusual,” or use a living constitutionalist approach, meaning the definitions of “cruel and unusual” would evolve alongside society’s definition of the words. According to the casebook, “cruel and unusual” was “derived from the English Bill of Rights of 1689, originally understood to refer to such ancient practices as branding, drawing and quartering, burning alive, and crucifixion.” After understanding the framer’s definitions, the Court decided in Trop v. Dulles that the Eighth Amendment should derive its meaning from the “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.” This decision carries through to the precedents that follow, especially in the death penalty cases. The Court must then choose a criteria or way of determining the “evolving standards” without overstepping their judicial power. As seen in Roper v. Simmons, the Court uses state laws and international agreements to support their notion of society’s evolving definition of what is “cruel and unusual…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Weems's case became extremely important precedent because it is the first instance when the 8th amendment’s applicability was challenged at a legal level. Justice Marshall in his opinion also discusses the case Trop v Dulles, where Trop lost his United States citizenship as a result of his military desertion. The courts also ruled this punishment as “ cruel and unusual,” because they believed depriving someone of their citizenship violated the 8th amendment. Justice Marshall includes this case because of its full on cruelty towards the individual. This is done to illustrate the evolution of the legal system when it considers the “ cruel and unusual,” clause of the 8th amendment. The precedents set by both the Weems case and the Trop case become extremely important since these start creating a standard to which the 8th amendment has to adhere to. As a result, its use starts becoming limited and the legal system starts questioning its effectiveness and…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The expression "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" has taken on a whole new…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty in the U.S. has been and continues to be a controversial debate between citizens. Debate regarding the policies, laws and if the death penalty is the best way to punish offenders who commit violent crimes. The history of the death penalty in the United States dates back to the late 1970s. Between 1968 and 1977 there were no executions in the United States. In the Supreme Court case of Furman v. Georgia, the court ruled that capital punishment, as it currently employed on the state and federal level is unconstitutional (Jones, 2006). The Eighth Amendment states that any form of capital punishment qualifies as “cruel and unusual punishment.” The use of executions during this time was primarily based on race and was considered by the Supreme Court as “arbitrary and capricious.”…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays