Preview

Morality in Mere Christianity

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Morality in Mere Christianity
Morality in C.S. Lewis’ Mere Christianity According to C.S. Lewis all living human beings are moral agents. Anyone who is physically and mentally capable of acting upon and making moral judgments in reference to right and wrong can be considered to be a moral agent. Of course, an agent must also be held responsible for such actions and judgments. Our society depends on people acting in accordance with this concept of moral agency. In order to make judgments on what is right and wrong, Lewis states that we as humans must have some sort of innate, universal standard of behavior. Lewis refers to this sense of value in his work, Mere Christianity, as the “Law of Human Nature” or “Moral Law,” simply because “the human idea of decent behavior [is]…known to everyone” (5). The Law of Human Nature provides humans with instincts on how to act, but we are not necessarily required to follow them. To keep record of and mentally tally up these actions is not the correct approach to advancing in moral knowledge and spiritual nourishment. Lewis’ suggests that acting in accordance with the Law of Human Nature should not be something one does merely for the sake of gaining entrance to the Heavenly Kingdom. Instead, acting morally should be something one does out of pure love and respect for God in addition to fellow humans. The Law of Human Nature does not infringe upon free will. Unfortunately, just because humans have a sense of morality does not mean they are forced to follow it. According to Lewis, God gives us true independence through free will, because it is the only way for humans to prove their true desire to be united with Him. Nonetheless, it is unfair to expect moral actions of anyone if s/he does not first have a sense of what moral actions are. Moral or Human Nature Law should serve as a map that will successfully guide us to God himself, but only if we choose to use and follow it correctly. Lewis states, “God created things which had free will. That

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. The biblical basis of Jubilee 2000’s call for the immediate canceling of all debts of HIPC’s is found in Leviticus. This bible book states that “you shall not oppress one another.” Also in the book of Leviticus in the case of someone who becomes poor and in turn to sells his possessions then his relative may redeem the possessions he sold. Or if the man has no one to redeem it but he himself becomes able to redeem it then let him count the years since the sale, and restore the remainder to the man whom he sold it, that he may return to his possessions. But if he’s not able to have it restored to himself, then what was sold shall remain in the land of him who bought it until the year of Jubilee and in the Jubilee it shall be released and he shall return to his possessions. (Lev 25:25-28 NKJV) This biblical situation is almost identical to the one of heavily impoverish countries. Those heavily impoverish countries were unable to accomplish financial stability so the more fortunate countries gave back to them in the form of erasing debt. There’s also Bible scripture in regards to debt owed by the poor. Proverbs 19:17 reads, “He who is kind to the poor lends to the Lord, and he will reward him for what he has done.” In addition, Deuteronomy 15:7-8 says, “If there is a poor man among your brothers in any of towns of the land that the Lord your God is giving you, do not be hardhearted or tightfisted toward your poor brother. Rather be openhanded and freely lend him whatever he needs.” I strongly agree with this approach. It’s only humane.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    RIGHT AND WRONG AS A CLUE TO THE MEANING OF THE UNIVERSE C.S. Lewis has presented many intriguing ideas in regards to how right and wrong relate to the universe. The moral law is a genuine thing, whether we agree with it or not. Lewis presents there is an absolute good and an absolute bad within the laws of human nature.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Puritans of early America were constantly reminded of the consequences of sinning. One such dynamic pastor of the time was Jonathan Edwards whose mission was to convert and convince his congregation of sinners. He did this through his powerful sermons. In "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," Edwards uses several rhetorical devices that contribute to the effectiveness of his sermon.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    C.S. Lewis first introduced his views about Christianity through several years of radio broadcast series. The material used on air was reintroduced to provide guidelines that uphold the beliefs and reinforce the values of Christians. Lewis addressed topics of theology, beliefs between what is right and wrong, expectations of mortality, and moral. These guidelines existed among several cultures for many years. This book provides a broad, but detailed description of objections related to natural law and how God is the giver of not only natural human laws but all laws.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    religious ethics can be rigid for moral decision making because if some one has an absolutist approach that means they will only have done answer for a situation there are in for example euthanasia the person might want to die because of the pain they are in and absolutist approach will see that as murder and nothing else, some people will have a relativist approach witch means they think about a decision and all the consequences that factor in to it as well for example, euthanasia my seem right with the person that has the revisits approach. this can link in with situation ethics because you need to use reason based on the christian principle of love to help you make one decision in a situation, which is saying the moral right thing to do in a situation is the most loving witch can be seen as quite rigid because it might be the most loving but is it the right thing to do, in situation ethics choosing the most loving decision may be right or wrong but does it think about the consequences it may hold, because in teleological ethics the morally right or wrong thing to do is based on the consequences therefor it makes moral decision making less rigid because you have to think of the consequences it may have first before making the decision which helps with the impact of that decision because it will have good consequences instead of bad one but you that might only be because you have made morally wrong decision but it has good consequences.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter four the issue of whether or not morality is dependant upon religion is analysed with respect to many different religious theories regarding morality. The chapter begins by acknowledging that there is a presumed connection between morality and religion. In the case of Judge Roy Moore, an advocate for religion and morality correlational relationship, he asserted that God’s law was as prevalent as the state’s law in his courtroom. Moore was sued multiple times for violating the separation of church and state but each time the people overwhelmingly supported his actions. As a resident of Alabama, Moore had the luxury of a conservative christian voter majority to place him back in power each time he was relieved of his office. With 92% of Americans claiming that they believe in God Moore is not in the minority in his belief that religion is a central part of religion however, there are many issues with the claim that what is moral is religious or Godly.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion is the official definition of free will. With free will, God gave us the choice to do whatever we want. With the devil tempting us, we are more inclined to choose evil over bad, but with God’s influence we choose good. Plus if humans were naturally evil everything we know about God is a lie. There are people who believe that the bible states that humans are born evil, however, it does not mentions the word evil. The bible states that humans are all born with original sin, the tendency to sin innate in all human beings, held to be inherited from Adam in consequence of the Fall. Because of free will and moral standards we choose what we know is right, deep in our hearts, human beings fear God ,therefore, it is in our nature to please…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Christian Ethics Project

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What is the difference between self-interest and selfishness? Why is this distinction important when considering the competitive market economy as appropriate for a society?…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The original concept of Natural law was thought of by Aristotle and was then adapted by Thomas Aquinas to fit the teachings and views of the Roman Catholic Church. Who was concerned with moral law of how human beings should behave .It is understood by reflecting on human nature and by rationally working what will lead to fulfilling your purpose. According to natural law “good” can only be achieved when the subject has fulfilled its end purpose, the end purpose of human beings is to be rational and achieve Eudemonia. Eudemonia is human flourishing, when they achieve happiness. Aquinas also believed natural law was in everyone, so everyone is good. Human’s unconsciously aim for perfection, to avoid evil and aim for god. Because we are made in god’s image, we are unable to knowingly go for evil. As Animals and humans share desires and wishes it’s only the ability to be rational that separates the human beings from the beasts. Aquinas also believed that the only way to discover divine design in nature, would be through human reason. The divine design was created to the essence/the idea before its actual existence. So the only way reason discovers what is right, is by interpreting nature.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Our worldviews are redefined over time, and that worldview dictates how we react and interact with the world around us. It becomes particularly important when faced with any ethical dilemmas. When we are faced with a dilemma that challenges our ability to uphold our worldview, it either strengthens our resolve or requires a reevaluation of what that worldview is. The abortion dilemma bellow will be used to examine how a Christian worldview would resolve an ethical dilemma and compare that resolution to my own worldview…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Christian Moral Theology engages questions and issues that invite discussion and interpretation of convictions through lenses of theology, using The Bible as one of its chief sources. It involves examination of perspectives through sociology, history, religion, ethics, policy, politics, ecclesiology, ideology, law, culture, and societal expectations and standards. This paper will focus on answering the question if Christians should desire happiness or not, and if they should, what are the reasons for their doing. Furthermore, the paper will include class lectures and course readings.…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lewis makes the comment that without a heart, man is “by his intellect…mere spirit and by his appetite mere animal” (Lewis, 8). Many criminals, especially those with excessive homicidal tendencies, we find, are mere animals. Lacking a conscious, or a value system that dictates right and wrong, such people are left with base appetites and impulses, which they follow without any remorse or guilt, degrading them to the level of animals. In the case of ‘mere spirits’, those who base their actions solely on reasoning and logic, we find that it is not reason that prompts one to do anything. Reason alone is not cause for action of any type; “no justification of virtue will enable a man to be virtuous” (Lewis, 8). Without a heart to carry out the response, such a person is a mere spirit: unable to express outwardly what is occurring inwardly. Additionally, if one was to follow the very limiting lifestyle of living according to reason, one would have a friendless, bland and uneventful life, much like a robot or computer. However, I might note that without an objective value system, such behavior cannot be criticized; behavior which is much more dangerous than mere animal behavior. For if no one is bound to an objective value system, then humans are mere animals, left to the whims of nature and emotion to survive, their lives insignificant and their accomplishments nothing. Everything we as humans live…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christian Ethics

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the difference between self-interest and selfishness? Why is this distinction important when considering the competitive market economy as appropriate for a society?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. By comparing it to the Law of Gravitation, Lewis explains that The Law of Human Nature is not a truth about the way things are, but a truth about the way things should be. (16-19)…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Book One, Lewis discusses the conscience mind set humans have of right and wrong.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics