Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Moral Status of the Foetus

Good Essays
911 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Status of the Foetus
The argument that I have chosen to discuss in this essay is the extreme liberal view. My aim is to show that this argument is false by critically examining and evaluating the argument and the consequences of the extreme liberal view. I am concentrating on the extreme liberal view because I find it to have many more consequences than the other three views. I also find it to be quite a controversial view that I’m sure is not widely held in society.
The extreme liberal view states that “the foetus is, in most if not all morally relevant respects, like a piece of tissue or a bit of the human body” (Hursthouse, 1987).
The extreme liberal view in standard form looks like this:
An unfertilised ovum has the same moral status as a piece of tissue.
Working forward from the unfertilised ovum, there is no point until birth that the developing ovum comes to possess a different moral status.
The foetus has the moral status of a piece of tissue right up until birth.

The first premise appears to be uncontentious. Unfertilised ovum in large numbers are lost in a variety of ways every day. However there is no cry of outrage by society or scientists spending millions of dollars researching ways to try and save ovum lost in these ways. Unfertilised ovum are lost approximately every 28 days by most females once puberty is reached until the commencement of menopause. Unfertilised ovum are also lost through In Vitro Fertilisation procedures and scientific research. It would be unrealistic to place the same moral status on an unfertilised ovum as you would to a fertilised ovum because if you held that the first premise was untrue it would almost be impossible to prove. Therefore the first premise would have to be true.

The second premise does not take into consideration the fertilisation of the ovum or the change of moral status once fertilisation occurs. An objection to premise two is the acorn analogy by Finnis (1974, 112 – 113) who holds that when a tree sprouts from an acorn it signifies the beginning of a life, and therefore so does the fertilisation of an ovum. Finnis (1974) describes fertilisation as a catastrophic event that involves the creation of something completely new (Finnis, 1974). You cannot possibly hold premise two to be true when fertilisation is described as the beginning of life and the time when the ovum becomes morally significant.
Therefore the second premise would have to be false.

The conclusion that the foetus has the moral status of a piece of tissue right up until birth has to be false. You can use the blue/green analogy by Hursthouse (1987) as an objection to this conclusion. When a blue object fades to green from being left in the sun for too long, you cannot pinpoint the exact moment that it changed colour, but you are aware that a significant change has occurred. The same can also be said to discount the theory that the foetus has the same moral status of a piece of tissue right up until birth. This is because even though you cannot see the exact moment when natural fertilisation occurs and the ovum becomes a foetus, the fact is that a significant change to the moral status of the foetus has occurred before birth. An exception to this, of course, is due to the advancements in medical science and in In Vitro Fertilisation technologies, it is possible to see the exact moment of conception through a microscope.

The consequences of this view mean that a woman can choose to terminate the foetus right up until birth for any reason at all. If you were to follow the extreme liberal view it would mean that termination could be carried out for reasons of vanity or convenience such as:
The pregnancy might make you put on weight.
The pregnancy might interrupt your career.
The pregnancy might interfere with your sex life.
You may not believe in contraception.

The extreme liberal view means that you can have an abortion of convenience on command. Whilst this may hold true to the extreme liberal view, it is not necessarily morally right or socially acceptable to have an abortion for the reasons set out above. If abortion of convenience on command was viewed as not being morally right, it could have a negative impact on the way people treat you and negatively impact on your relationships within your family, with your peers and the wider community.
It seems unlikely that abortion of convenience on command would ever be accepted in society for trivial matters such as vanity.

The argument can be further reduced from the standard form down to a logical form to show the validity of the argument: p = the view q = the consequences
If p then q
Not q
Not p
It shows that the view is unacceptable and therefore it is a false argument which is modus tollens.

This essay has set out to show how the extreme liberal view is an unacceptable view by using the objections, consequences and analogies to critically examine the argument and to support that the view is unacceptable.

References
Hursthouse, R.
1987 Extracts from ‘The moral status of the foetus’ Chapter 2 of Beginning lives, Blackwell/Open University.

McLean, G.R.
2014 Applied Ethics, PHL101 Study Guide, Faculty of Arts. Charles Sturt University.

McLean, G.R.
2014 Applied Ethics, PHL101 Readings, Faculty of Arts. Charles Sturt University.

References: Hursthouse, R. 1987 Extracts from ‘The moral status of the foetus’ Chapter 2 of Beginning lives, Blackwell/Open University. McLean, G.R. 2014 Applied Ethics, PHL101 Study Guide, Faculty of Arts. Charles Sturt University. McLean, G.R. 2014 Applied Ethics, PHL101 Readings, Faculty of Arts. Charles Sturt University.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Abortion Distortion

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    be a murder because the fetus is not a human being yet; it cannot live outside the uterus on its…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to convince us of the immorality of abortion, John Noonan (2012) addresses the question of when a fetus becomes “human” (p. 469). He argues against several popular ideas. One popular position is that a fetus becomes human when it becomes viable (could survive outside of the mother’s womb). Noonan (2012) argues that this position makes the distinction that until viability, the fetus is completely dependent upon its mother. He argues that even when a child is born, and for several years of its life, it is completely dependent upon another to feed and care for it. In his opinion, if no longer being dependent is the criterion for humanity, then children don’t become “human” until they are able to care for themselves (p. 469-470). The main issue with Noonan’s argument is that he interchanges the terms “viable” and “dependent”. Although an infant is dependent upon another person for survival, it no longer needs to be physically connected to that person. It can be dependent on someone other than its mother.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abortion: A Woman's Right

    • 4396 Words
    • 18 Pages

    According to Sumner, the established views on abortion are the liberal/pro-choice view and the conservative/pro-life view. The former is characterized by the belief that the fetus has no moral standing as long as it is a fetus, that is, until birth. In contrast, the latter believes that the fetus has moral standing at every stage of pregnancy, that is, from the moment of conception (Sumner 1992, p. 34). As a result of their opposing conceptions of the moral status of the fetus, the pro-choice position…

    • 4396 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Arras, John D., Alex John London, and Bonnie Steinbock. Embryo Ehtics-The Moral Logic of…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    opposite claim; that the unborn child, because it is a developing human being, possesses a moral status…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leonard Peikoff on the other hand, is a supporter of Pro choice, He believes, “The embryo is clearly pre-human; only the mystical notions of religious dogma treat this clump of cells as consulting a person.” (Peikoff, abortion rights are pro life). Although each author is completely against one another in terms of abortion, both take different approaches to conveying their opinions. Leonard Peikoff takes the approach of appealing to logic and the women’s’ ability to make an informed decision whether or not to go through with an abortion. Hey says, “If we are to accept the equation of the potential with the actual and call the embryo an “unborn child,” we could, with logic, call any adult an “undead corpse” and bury him alive or vivisect him for the instruction of medical students.” (Peikoff) He uses logic to force people to think about abortion logically and get them to question what an unborn child or fetus actually is. He almost describes an unborn child as a parasite in that it is part of a woman’s body and that it is not an independently existing, biologically formed organism, let alone a person.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When a fetus gains moral status, or when the fetus becomes a person, is an unclear point that…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over whether abortion should be legal and to what point in the pregnancy it should be allowed has polarized many societies. Many religious preach that at the moment of conception, the new life is human and possesses a soul. Therefore, abortion is murder. Other, less extreme views, suggest the life is not human until there is a recognizable "completion of form." A third view proposes we have an obligation to create a good life for all children already born before we bring more unwanted children into the world.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) Virtuous women have abortions (under circumstances that pregnancy would inhibit their ability to pursue other virtuous tasks)…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion”, an essay written by Mary Anne Warren, defend abortion in any stage of a woman’s pregnancy (pg 468). Warren argues that the potential to become a human being is not the same as being human and deserving the same right to life (pg. 468-472). This essay asserts that in order to be human, one must possess five particular traits (pg. 470). These trait are consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, the ability to communicate, and awareness of oneself (pg. 470). Warren claims that since a fetus has not yet acquired all of the traits, then that fetus is not human and therefore does not have the right to life (pg. 470). Besides the argument about a fetus’ right to life, Warren contends that placing restrictions on abortion show “disregard for the rights of women” (pg. 472). She claims that a woman should have absolute control over her decision to become a mother or terminate her pregnancy.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Medical Ethics Abortion

    • 3197 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Most moral issues in medicine and healthcare will instigate lively debate, but no subject seems to inflame tempers more than the question of abortion. The gulf between pro-life and pro-choice can be an uncompromising stance of deeply held beliefs and principles. On the one hand, there is the claim that the foetus is a human being with the same right to life as any other human being, and abortion is therefore nothing less than murder. On the other hand, it is argued that a woman has a right to choose what happens within her own body, and is therefore justified in deciding to have her foetus removed if she so wishes. Even a liberal view is problematic; these tend to take the view that it is permissible for an abortion to take place before a certain stage in the foetuses development, but not beyond that given point. Such an arbitrary perspective does seem difficult to quantify; how can anyone determine the criteria that would navigate a decision that finds termination acceptable today but morally reprehensible tomorrow? It is sometimes argued that the foetus reaches personhood well before birth. “By the tenth week, for example, it already has a face, arms and legs, fingers and toes; it has internal organs, and brain activity is detectable.”[1] But does this undermine a woman’s right to self determination—can it still be reasonable for her to choose abortion, given its level of development? We shall explore this question; not from the perspective of whether the foetus is human, but from the premise “that the woman’s rights over her body are more important than the life of the person or part person in her womb.”[2]…

    • 3197 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion is one of the maternal-foetal conflict issues that has arisen in today’s society. Liberal views do not provide any moral or legal view concerning foetuses while conservative’s views that a foetus is a human being since it has life (Nocon, 2010). They also believe that life starts at conception. These two views show the conflicting nature of the issue that is at hand in the society. Nevertheless the two extremities acknowledge ethical principles of autonomy in women as well as nonmaleficience towards the fetus. It is important to note that the law has never come close to taking the conservative views. It has always been associated with the liberal view of the society (Garrett et al., 2011).…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abortions To Kill

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Embryonic stem cell research motivates murder. Since embryonic stem cell research relies on the production of destroyed embryos, abortion must be in duration. Moreover, an embryo exists as an immature form of a human being, so destruction of an embryo would be murder. In contrast, pro-choice advocates believe that an embryo exists as a woman’s body and therefore, do not find abortion as murder of an innocent being. To substantiate, Nichols, an associate of the Department of Philosophy and the University of Wisconsin, certifies in his article “Abortion, Time-Relative Interests” that “...abortions are immoral, for the same reason that killing you or me is immoral: abortion deprives the fetus of a valuable future” (1). Because the future of a fetus endures a human being, abortion would result in the same effect of murder. That person’s right to experience life would diminish just as a victim to murder. To…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stem Cell ethics research

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Whether current protections for these groups are adequate Conditions for Moral Compromise • • • • • Factual uncertainty Moral complexity Need for a relatively immediate decision Desire to maintain a cooperative relationship Scarcity of resources Enthusiast Concessions for Compromise • Limit the use of embryos to surplus and nonviable embryos • Prohibiting substantive payments to ova donors •…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays