Preview

Moral Evil Vs Natural Evil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2044 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Evil Vs Natural Evil
RS

I believe that God doesn't exist due to the fact that if there is a supposed omni-benevolent God then why is the world is full of so much evil and suffering? Evil and suffering comes in two forms Moral evil and Natural evil. Moral evil is caused by humans using their free will, for example, crimes such as murder, burglary and war. Natural evil is suffering that has not been caused by humans such as earthquakes, floods, volcanoes, cancers and so on and are therefore not caused by humans. These natural evils can have catastrophic results with huge loss of life and human suffering.

It is be cause of this evil and suffering in the world that I began to reject my belief in God. If God is omnipotent (all-powerful), he must be able to remove
…show more content…
For example, the UPD faces the obvious objection that if you have no idea what reason God has for allowing evil, then for all you know there is no justifiable reason at all for an all-good God to allow it. And even if the FWD and SMT were successful, they would still leave much apparently gratuitous evil unexplained.

But couldn't God have created a world without evil? Let's take a look at a few of the options. If God had not created anything, there would be no evil. But is nothing better than something? Hardly. This would be a world without morality. What if God created a world where people could not choose? God could force everyone to stop before they were able to carry out evil behaviour. But is such a world where freedom does not exist good?

As William Rowe points out, when a fawn burns to death in a forest fire and no human being ever knows about it, this apparently unnecessary evil neither preserves human free will nor builds the character of human beings. So what is the point in evil and suffering? There isn't one, and this is why I do not think God exists as there is no apparent reason for an Omni-benevolent, omnipotent and omniscient person to do such
…show more content…
When the big bang produced a vast amount of positive energy, it simultaneously created the same amount of negative energy. In this way the positive and the negative energy add up to 0. So where is all this negative energy today? It’s in space. This may sound odd but according to the laws of nature concerning gravity and motion, laws that are among to oldest in science. Space itself is a vast store of negative energy, enough to ensure that it adds up to 0. The endless web of billions upon billions of galaxies each pulling on one and other with the force of gravity, acts like a giant storage device. The universe Is like an enormous battery storing negative energy. the positive side of things, the mass and the energy we see today is like the hill the corresponding hole or negative side of things is spread throughout space. So what does that mean on our quest to find out if there is a God? It means that if the universe adds up to nothing, then you don’t need a God to create it. Since we know that the positive and negative in the universe adds up to 0, all we have to do now is work out what or dare I say who triggered the whole process in the first place. What could cause the spontaneous appearance of a universe? at first, it seems a baffling problem. after all, in our daily lives things don’t just simply materialise out of the blue. you cant just click

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Evil, how did it happen and why is it still here on this earth? There is this belief that the Christian God is good and all-powerful. He has the power to create worlds and beings, yet there is still evil in the world. Both Pierre Bayle and Voltaire address these questions in their works “Paulicians” and Candide (respectively). They both believe the Manichean philosophy as a more rational thought process than the contemporaneous Christian view. This belief is that there is not one, but two gods in the world; a god of good and a god of evil. I myself believe in a world of balance and like the two authors listed above, accept this as more rational thought than a single omnipotent god. My reasoning is that without evil, there is no concept of good,…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    protocol paper 1

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Recall: In "The problem of evil," James Rachels and Stuart Rachels provider some important point: 1) Pain is not body’s warning system needed, because newborn babies did not deserve inexorable pain; 2) Even If we need evil to appreciate the good, but it is does not explain why there is such an extraordinary amount of evil in this world; 3) The doctrine of original sin was absurd. According to authors, it would be come to a conclusion that a newborn baby did deserve terrible disease. 4) The idea that Free Will Defense is in apparent contradiction to the natural evil in the world. 5) Based on the idea that a world without suffering would be void of the virtues necessary for good moral development. It does not explain the reason that God allowed the Holocaust or isolated cases of extreme cruelty to happen. 6) The theory of moral development does not explain the reason why animals suffering.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If God were to exist, then why do we have evil? Evil things happen to good people so if God were to exist then why does he let it happen? When slavery was created, it was a time where white people would have black people as their slave. The slaves would get treated bad and would get punished if they did not do what they were told to do by the owners. The slaves would get punished by having a ball and chain around them to know where they were at. Some of them would even be sentenced to death when they would not do what they were told or just did not do the kind of job that the owner wanted them to do. The slaves would pray and worship to God to save them. They would even sing songs through worship to help them out during this evil time. So, you would think even though the slaves would worship God and God knew what was happening, why would this still happen to them?…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: James Rachels addresses the conflicts of evil in his book “Problems from Philosophy” by providing various forms of logical problems. The author points out the different possible explanations to why evil would exist. The first major idea Rachels makes is that perhaps pain is essential to caution people of danger. He goes on to suggest that this would not account for why some people are born with deadly diseases. Another idea he makes is that evil helps people appreciate the good in life. One would not be able to distinguish the good in life if evil did not exist. However, this does not explain why the world needs so much evil to exist, instead of letting a few bad things happen occasionally. The third idea the author makes questions why bad things happen to good people. Rachels suggests maybe those bad things that occur in life are…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural evil came from the loss of order in nature, moral evil came from the knowledge of good and evil that humanity had discovered through disobedience because they choose the lesser good. Those who follow God will live an eternal life however those who reject God would suffer eternal torment.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious folk claim that God is all-benevolent. If this is the case, then why is evil permitted to exist? When faced with this question, believers state that evil exists to promote “the greater good”. The greater good is the idea that some pain and suffering must exist in the world for us as humans to access our second and third level “good” platforms. These levels consist of human qualities such as courageousness, charity and sacrifice. Believers claim that life would not be as good, or as whole, without knowing these feelings, however, I argue that if we never knew any of the “higher level” qualities, then we wouldn’t miss them. If, from the beginning, we only knew the first level good, and knew no pain and suffering, then we wouldn’t know any different. Could it not be a better life, a better world, with absolutely no pain, suffering or evil? So, the question remains, if God is wholly good then how does evil exist? It is possible that God is not completely good, it may be that He permits some evil to exist so we can reach our “greater goods.” On the opposing side of that theory, is it actually that there may not be a God and that evil is a product of our human nature, as well as the good in the world.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theology 202 Essay 1

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The question of evil is a common hot button topic among atheists and non-Christians who attempt to disprove Christianity. They argue that an omnipotent and omniscient God cannot exist in a world with so much evil. The argument is used by them to try to prove that Christianity is “internally self-contradictory and thereby to be rejected.” Many claim that a benevolent and caring God would certainly not create evil or allow it to flourish in the world that He created. So, the problem of evil is how to explain that there can be a perfect, all-powerful, and all-loving God that exists in a world with so much moral and natural evil.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Problem of Evil- Notes

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The three are logically inconsistent. If God is omnipotent, he is aware of the existing evil and suffering and knows how to put a stop to it. If God is omni benevolent he will want to put a stop to it. Yet evil and suffering does exist.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the Problem of Evil? Is it reasonable to believe a Perfectly Good God, or even a Good God exists if there is suffering in the world?…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the objections to the argument from evil, I took the free will argument as the strongest. Let’s first exam the argument from evil, and see how the free will argument irrationalize it.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probably the most powerful reason against the existence of The Classical God of Theism (hereafter referred to as God) is evil and suffering in the world. The problem of evil is an ‘a posterori’ argument, established from experience based on empirical senses. It is also synthetic as evil and suffering can be seen around us daily. There are a number of possible reasons for the problem of evil and why it causes a problem for religious believers, making it an inductive argument also. In his book Philosophy of Religion John Hick defined evil and suffering as “physical pain, mental suffering and moral wickedness”…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Grendel Evil?

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In a world of chaos, he who lives, lives by his own laws and values. Who is to say that the death of millions is any worse or better, for that matter, than injuring a cockroach. And in the case of an existing power in the form of God, who is presumed to be all which is good, presiding and ruling an organized universe, why then does evil exist? The prosaic response of "without evil, there is no good" no longer holds any validity in this argument as the admitted goal of good is to reach an existence without evil. So even if a God does exist, I think it is fair, at this point, to say that he is the embodiment of both good and evil. And if humoring those who would answer the previous question with the response that there can be no good without evil, then can we assume that evil is simply a subsection of a defined good? Or perhaps even a good thing? If it is essential, those who chose the side of evil are simply abiding by good values. In the case of a world ruled by Chaos, evil is a non-existent word or value, rather. The system upon which a person's actions are judged also disappears leaving nothing but an instinct for natural survival as basic and primary as the life within the forests which we tear down to build our houses.…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Problem of Evil Lyndsey Emry PHIL 1381-17 Introduction to Philosophy Professor Bannister The problem of evil is the problem of reconciling the existence of the evil in the world with the existence of an omniscient God because if God were all-knowing, it seems that God would know about all of the horrible things that happen in our world. The problem of evil also brings up the problem with an omnipotent God because if God were all-powerful, God would be able to stop all of the evil and suffering in the world. Furthermore, the problem of evil also challenges an omnibenevolent God because if God were morally perfect, then surely God would want to do something about it.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem of evil is that if God exists then he should know to prevent all evil doings. If this God existed then we would want him to prevent all of the evil doing in the world. War, rape, and murder are examples that have not been prevented and still are ongoing today. The argument claims then that there is no such God. I think the problem of evil exists because it exists for a certain kind of good meaning every bad thing will eventually lead to something good. There are certain things that need the opposite of one self in order to be true. For example, in order to become brave, you need to show that you are brave. You must be fearless of doing dangerous things in order to be brave. God created us to depend on each other so that we can become a loving…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Problem of Evil

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This argument purports or tends to show a logical inconsistency between Gods existence and evil existence. Therefore, this argument starts with three ancient features that many theists believe in as true of God. The logical problem, hence, argues that such a being cannot allow or tolerate any evil. There being evil then it is automatic that there is no such being. In the simplest form of this argument is that God is omnipotent, he is wholly good and yet evil exists (Rowe 30). These three propositions specks up contradictions, as if two are true then the other one is false.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays