Preview

Moral Dilema Determination

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
462 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Dilema Determination
24, March 2013 Moral Dilema Determination inspired many of the suffering persevere in their rescue efforts which eventually paid off

when they escaped. Each person must make difficult judgment in the course of everyday life. Decisions that seem trivia at the time, sometimes the choice is better to meet the expectations of others or to meet the expectation of the conscience like in “alive”,“Thirty eight who so murder didn’t call the police”and “shooting an elephant”.

"Alive," a true account of astonishing survival. In 1972, a plane carrying a rugby team from Uruguay crashed in the Andes mountains. Of 45 passengers, only 16 survived the 70 days on the mountain. For ten excruciating weeks

they
…show more content…
one of the most astonishing true adventures of the twentieth century. Al of the survivors suffered from severe cold, lack of food, and some had injuries,or infections. The test was severe, and yet, this young man could say that it was his greatest experience. sheer stubbornness and determination that got him over those mountains to get help for the rest. we learn the moral dilema of alive people have to eat other people to stay alive. “Thirty eight who so murder didn’t call the police” moral dilema are 38 witness a killer and harmless woman which are the character in the story and no one said or did anything to help her . Kitty Genovese died. Finally, at 3:50 A.M., the police received a phone call from a neighbor of Genovese's . In two minutes they were on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Kitty Genovese was a New Yorker that was stabbed outside of her apartment building. She would call out for help and when the assailant saw light from the windows he would leave, but as soon as there was no more light he would come back. This continued for about three times total in a 35 minute time frame. According to several witnesses, many believed that it was a lovers quarrel. Many also didn’t want to get involved with the situation that was happening. Out of the 38 people that had heard the commotion, only two people called the police for help. A 70 year old woman who was passing by saw Miss Genovese and went to help her. Miss. Genovese died on the way to the hospital.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Book Report On Unbroken

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The U.S. Olympian three time gold medalists for U.S.A Gail Devers once said, “Sometimes we fall, sometimes we stumble, but we can't allow life to beat us down. Everything happens for a reason, and it builds character in us, and it tells us what we are about and how strong we really are when we didn’t think we could be that strong”. In Laura Hillenbrand's nonfiction book Unbroken, Louis Zamperini demonstrated determination throughout his life to overcome difficulties in track all the way to surviving his Word War II bomber crashing into the Pacific Ocean where he was stranded for 47 day. Overall, Louis's own ambition is what Hillenbrand highlighted throughout this book to tell his truly remarkable story.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While telling a story, details are often spared; in the story of Kitty Genovese, the information we are usually supplied with excludes various details about the mysterious girl. The documentary, The Witness, revealed details about the night of Kitty’s murder, her personal life and the lives of her family members.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differences that are considered right and wrong. At this age he or she should know…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Dilema

    • 950 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this paper, I will discuss the ethical dilemma faced by a nurse who is caring for an eight month old patient, who reports with his mother to the emergency room with a suspicious fracture. The mother provides a plausible story, and the physician knows the family and does not suspect abuse. I will discuss the action I would take in order to provide the appropriate care for this patient.…

    • 950 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we speak of “Morality” we think of the difference between right and wrong, the difference between the good and the evil. We use morality to justify our actions and decisions. More often than not, people impose their morality on others and expect them to act in the way they find fit. They believe that the idea of right and wrong is universal. In her essay “On Morality”, Didion contradicts this theory and believes that everyone can have different ideas of morality based on their own perception.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    right to steal in order to save a human life. On the one hand, some argue that stealing even if…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics, Morality, and Integrity all have some of the same elements that defines a person character. Being trustworthy leads to other elements of integrity. Such as, helping to better the community and respecting authority as a Parole Officer shows honesty. Being fair is another element which shows integrity. How can you be a Parole Officer, but doesn`t treat everyone equally? Third, being able to take responsibility for your own actions and personal growth as a Parole Officer shows integrity, as well. If you basically blame all of your failures and lack of progress on others around you then that shows your character and you cannot exhibit integrity with others and your career if you cannot be honest to yourself. Ethics as a Parole Officer could…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Frankena (1973) Socrates argued that there were three typical patterns of reasoning in moral matters. The first belief was that no one should harm to another person. The principle was if an action was to the detriment of another human then it went counter to moral reasoning. If a person killed another person for whatever cause then it cannot be justified using moral reasoning. This belief has been used by those who oppose fighting a war, condemning a person to death for a crime, or by those choosing to object to abortions. Frankena (1973) uses Socrates example about escaping from jail to validate the point that the action would do harm to the state. Thus, it would hurt people.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even though living in pain can be a physical and emotional toll on a person’s life, no one can judge or comment on it without knowing how it feels, but choosing to end your life for this cause is ethically wrong. A person should not be able to choose between life and death like it is something normal that we do every day. Dying is not the answer to a person’s problems, pains, or sufferings. Now a day technology and medicine are highly advanced and can cure or reduce the pain of a person with a disease. Choosing to end your life is basically committing suicide and suicide is wrong.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Situations where humans are put under extreme pressure are those that show a person’s true character. In 1988, Andrew Wright, a cave diver and explorer, had been in Nullarbor Plain on the Great Australian Blight Coast for about a month. Wright and his team of 14 explorers were hauling up equipment when a freak storm hit the cave. The storm dumped 400mm of water on the plain in 25 minutes. An estimated 300 million liters of water filled the cave in minutes, collapsing the cave entrance and forcing all but two to remain trapped underground. Wright was one of the two that escaped from the cave. He and the other lucky explorer worked for hours using radios and communicating with the underground team. He would try to find a new passageway to enter and exit the cave, and those underground would do the same until they met in the middle. Everyone was returned to safety and lived to tell…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is curious, but till that moment I had never realized what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious man. When I saw the prisoner step aside to avoid the puddle, I saw the mystery, the unspeakable wrongness, of cutting a life short when it is in full tide. This man was not dying,…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proposed surgery violates in Gert's moral evaluation process the moral rule of do not deceive. It breaks the rule because the surgery changes the man's face in a way that shows that he is not sick. Some may say this is a great thing, but when it comes to the man being HIV positive this can be a tragic thing. The man himself could then go and spread the infection around and no one would know it. The surgery deceives people in thinking that there is nothing wrong with this man. If we were to go through Gert's Morally Relevant Process, the rule of do not deceive is in fact broken. Then we look at the fact harm has been created with breaking this rule,and there are no relevant beliefs or desires. There are no special relationships with…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knowing Your Audience

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On August 5, 2010, a small copper mine located in Chile suffered a cave-in which left 33 workers trapped underground. With workers being trapped 300 meters below ground with limited food, water, and oxygen, nobody knew for sure how long they would survive. After four days of being trapped, there was still no idea if any of the miners were even alive. Never before have so many workers survived being trapped underground for so long (Yang, 2010). Fortunately, in this case, tears turned to amazement as all 33 miners were located and rescued without any lives lost.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Niccolo’ Machiavelli had their own perspectives on what was moral and immoral. King and Machiavelli view what was morality right and how they would use this judgment in government and how it affected people in everyday life. King fought a moral fight against what was described as immoral laws to oppress blacks during an era of segregation in the United States. He believes that sometime it is moral to take action against immoral laws to get the results he and others that fought alongside him desired. Machiavelli as a Ruler, during a time when his country was unstable and constant political in-fighting, believed it was better to be feared than loved, and he took the immoral action of oppression to gain respect morally from his followers as a result. Machiavelli was a believer of the art of war to gain power, while King believed power was achieved in non-violence.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays