Preview

Montgomery Vs Alabama Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
395 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Montgomery Vs Alabama Case Study
Jackson Bewley
Mr. Uhler
Humanities 8
12 November 2015
SCOTUS Simulation
In the case Montgomery v. Louisiana Henry Montgomery was charged with the murder of Charles Hunt. He was sentenced to life in prison without parole. However he was only 17. Henry Montgomery should be sentenced to life in prison without parole because he committed murder. He was willing to kill an innocent man. 58% of states have come to the conclusion that the risk of releasing the murder under the age of 18 has the risk of future victims. Meaning if we let this criminal out he could strike again. The sentences should be based on age. Miller v. Alabama was about a 14 year old and Monomer v. Alabama was about a 17 year old. You can not compare these two ages. 17 is near

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Georgia v. Randolph is a landmark case pertaining to the search of a private resident without a search warrant where one resident gives law enforcement personnel consents to conduct a search and the other member objects. This particular case involved a married couple Scott and Janet Randolph, who were having marriage problems. Janet decided to leave Scott taking their son with her to Canada (Wood 2007 para 1). After being gone for a little over a month she and the child returned to the same residents where Scott had remained. One day shortly after her return, they got into an argument and Scott left the resident with their child in fear that she would take off again.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two days following Davis’s conviction on charges of the murder of Officer Mark MacPhail, jury recommended the death penalty and Davis was sentenced to death. Officer MacPhail’s family wasn’t allowed to testify but Davis comment with; “Spare my life, just give me a second chance. That’s all I ask. I was convicted for offenses that I didn’t commit.” If the victim was still alive to testify, he could have confirmed Davis’s statement or better yet identify the true shooter in the case rather it really was Troy Davis or not.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tinker v. Des Moines is a court case that happened in 1969 and was a dispute about wearing armbands to school for a protest against the Vietnam war. The principals did not like the idea of the protest and decided to shut it down by banning all armbands. The students weren't going to go down without a fight and wore them anyway.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Texas vs Cobb case a man named Raymond Levi Cobb was first arrested in 1994 and confessed to a home burglary. In this process he denied that he killed the woman and child in the home but later confessed to his father which his father then went to report this to the police. Even though Cobb later waived his Miranda rights and confessed he was still indicted and sentenced to death. Cobb argued to the Texas Court of Appeals that after his confession he was denied his right to counsel because his request for an attorney wasn’t renewed after the burglary case. The Court later said that the right to counsel carries onto the reason charged if any other offenses are closely related to the case. It was then declared with a five to four vote under…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mildred Jeter, an African-American woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, went to Washington, D.C, to get married and avoid Virginia’s interracial marriage ban. When they returned to Virginia not long after, the Lovings were arrested under the charges of violating Virginia’s interracial marriage ban.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court had ruled that juveniles who committed a crime such as murder, could not be sentenced to life in prison because it is violating the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In the supreme court decision, I agree that it is harsh and should not be allowed for a minor to serve life in prison, even if murder is committed. The decision is agreeable due to the severe punishment on someone young whose life is ruined over the decision they made. The information on a minor is misleading it masks a juvenile as a brutal killer is society's eyes. These statements should be brought to the people who are disagreeing with the court decision, and prove that these minors do not deserve an adult sentence with life in prison.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evan Miller Court Case

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miller argued that this decision violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment and was cruel and unusual punishment but the final decision did not change. Miller also argued that his sentenced should not have been the same as an adult’s because a 14 year old boy’s undeveloped brain did not allow him to have much control over his behavior. I agree with Miller because I believe that a 14 year old is unable to really understand the consequences of his decisions. When Miller went to his neighbor’s trailer the first time he was looking for drugs, I believe that the environment he was living in should have been taken into consideration when he went on trial. Therefore, in my opinion sentencing a 14 year old to life in prison without parole is cruel and unusual punishment and does violate the Eight and Fourteenth…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case was widely known throughout the country. The International Labor of Defense supported the Scottsboro Boys and help raise money for them. The ILD brought their case all over the media to gain support and awareness for the boys’ mistreatment. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) helped the boys’ family and in court, though in January 1932, the organization withdrew from the case. The Scottsboro Boys set a legal precedent and becomes an influential force to the Civil Rights Movement. The Scottsboros’ became the stimulant for the powerful movement. The Court’s decisions gave civil rights’ activists power to end racism in the South. The phrase, “Free the Scottsboro Boys!” became the public outcry for all…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the nation have different views on the subject of juvenile justice. Some believe that despite the children's age, they should still be tried as an adult if a serious crime is committed. On the other hand, some believe children should not be tried as adult even if they commit a rather serious crime. I firmly that these children should not be sentenced to life in prison despite the serious crime that they have committed and should have another shot at life when their brain is fully developed.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You see people everyday getting different sentences and consequences for the same crimes. This happens because defendants differ when it comes to mentality, past crimes, culpability and blameworthiness. There has been recent brain imaging technology that shows from the “prefrontal cortex to the limbic area, the teenage brain is undergoing dramatic changes during adolescence in ways that affect teens ability to reason, to weigh consequences for their decisions and to delay gratification long enough to make careful short and long term choices.” (Schwartz 2010). MacArthur and his researches concluded that young people under the age of fifteen should never be tried as an…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5.5-4 Juvenile Shootings

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Roper vs. Simmons (2005) the verdict was to determine the minimum age for capital punishment, cruel and unusual punishment, and the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment. They wanted to decide was it permissible under the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments to the Constitution of the United States to execute a juvenile offender who was older than 15 but younger than 18 when they committed a capital crime. The Supreme Court stated the gravity of capital punishment and its application “Capital punishment must be limited to those offenders who commit a narrow a category of the most serious crimes’ and whose extreme culpability makes them the most deserving of execution.” The Court further stated that juveniles are different because they are “more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures, including peer pressure”; and that “that the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as that of an adult.” (CaseBriefs, 2005) Justice Kennedy, who was writing for the majority,…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Given that 16- and 17-year olds as a group are less mature developmentally than adults, imposing capital punishment on such adolescents does not serve the judicially recognised purposes of the sanction…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eassy

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Adolescence and the death penalty, two words more commonly seen together as of late. With growing number of young adult being tried and sentenced as adults for violent crimes the question rises why did they commit does age matter to the jury when they are put on trial?…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trying Juveniles as Adults

    • 2749 Words
    • 11 Pages

    If your son or daughter were killed by a seventeen-year-old, would you be able to accept the fact that the murderer would be walking the streets again in less than a year because the law allows those under eighteen to be tried as juveniles? Forty-four states and Washington, DC, passed several laws between 1992 and 1997 enabling the judiciary to transfer juveniles to the adult court system. Today, murders committed by adults have decreased over 18%, but murders by juveniles have increased 22%. Throughout this paper I am going to explain why many criminologists feel juveniles commit crimes, I am also going to discuss the "Three Strikes and You're Out" laws, the three ways a juvenile can end up in adult court, and why juveniles should be tried as adults. I will also incorporate the views of people who oppose trying juveniles as adults and their reasons for this. If a juvenile is old enough to commit a serious crime, then he or she is old enough to face serious consequences.…

    • 2749 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1996 based on the Frontline Texas study found that juveniles sentenced in adult court did receive longer terms than they would have received in juvenile court. Some people don't know what they are doing until something bad happens, they think parents will always be there to solve the problem. A lot of people go through things that they can't help and it makes them want to commit a crime. They sometimes have the capability to change as adults so why treat them like adults when they are not yet adults. Due to the existence of this rule that juvenile should not be sentenced, it had indirectly encouraged the…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays