Preview

Monsanto's Cruelty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
581 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Monsanto's Cruelty
To maintain their level of profit, corporations deliberately conceal the long-term health risks posed by their products and deceive consumers with falsified information. For example, the American multinational agrochemical company, Monsanto, introduced the synthetic hormone rBGH designed to increase milk production by 11-16%. Because Monsanto declared that their product involves zero antibiotics and proudly claimed that it is safe for both animal and human health, rBGH was extensively used by 17% of American dairy farmers and was approved by the FDA without hesitance. However, researches soon revealed that this artificial hormone is composed of antibiotics and, as it circulates through cows’ bloodstream, this drug eventually contaminates the …show more content…
These concrete facts clearly contradict Monsanto’s previous statements and debunk this multinational corporation’s deceitfulness, its callous attitude towards other human beings as well as its acceptance of animal cruelty. Since Monsanto deceives the public through the media in a flagrant manner, it further illustrates the company’s open disregard of the laws and exposes its discreditable nature. Moreover, the discovery of health risks did not impede Monsanto’s search for profit. Instead of confessing the truths to the public, Monsanto suppressed the opposition voices using money and underplayed this safety issue in reports (i.e. replacing the word “cancer” with “implication”). Monsanto’s desperate measures to sustain sales demonstrate its incapability to admit guilt and its lack of moral constraints. Although Monsanto appears extremely execrable, it represents only a small part of the relentless industries and its action reflects the epidemic, more deleterious misconducts permeated in the business world. The majority of businesses today are motivated purely by profit that they have lost ethical considerations and sense of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As a producer of genetically modified seeds that lead to larger crop yields and eventually larger profits for farmers, Monsanto has a moral obligation to farmers who have grown crops and saved seeds for the next crop for hundreds of years before Monsanto began changing the genetic makeup of the seed. Farmers should not feel obligated to Monsanto as they have manipulated the future of farming through patent protection of intellectual property. Some thoughts should be discussed regarding Monsanto’s position; the comparison of seed manipulation as a form of technology, the use of patent protection, and the bullying of farmers through investigations of farmers reusing seeds from a previous harvest.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the beginning of this case it breifly explains when Monsanto was founded which was in 1901 by John F. Queeny in St. Louis, Missouri. He grew this company to be one of the world's largest seed companies today. They first started out producing artificial sweeteners called saccharine, which was sold to Coca-Cola back when Monsanto was still becoming big. Monsanto also sold caffeine extract and vanillin, which was an artificial vanilla flavoring that Coca-Cola also bought from them. During World War I Monsanto saw an opportunity to grow into the chemical industry and started specializing in plastics, its own agricultural chemicals, and synthetic rubbers. A few years later, Monsanto created its first ever Roundup herbicide that would later take the company to the top. Although Monsanto has found a way to keep crops from becoming eaten or killed from insects by their Roundup herbicide, it has also become a huge consumer issue. With Monsanto genetically modifying seeds to insure they grow quicker and healthier than standard crops, people are starting to wonder whether or not these seeds are bad for our environment or even the people and animals consuming them. Monsanto has had a lot of lawsuits against them consisting of one from Dupont, which is another leader in the seed distribution industry. The alligation was brought up from the American Antitrust Institute for alleged anticompetitve activities. The instution had argued that Monsanto was hindering competition due to the patent on their seeds and limiting seed inovation. This is just one of the lawsuits or problems that Monsanto has…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Within Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele’s article “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear,” the reader receives information on the complicated history and questionable business tactics of the agriculture company Monsanto. Moreover, Barlett and Steele bring to light numerous counts of wrong doing committed by Monsanto by focusing on the legal actions and cases found in state and federal courts. Particular attention is focused on the vast resources and funds that Monsanto utilizes to deter smaller farmers and co-ops from continuing the cases in court, consequently, most of the cases are settled. Also, a great amount of space remains dedicated to a history lesson of the Monsanto company. Therefore, Monsanto has many ligations due to improper chemical…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monsanto Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The most infamous GMO based company is Monsanto. For those who haven’t seen Food Inc. Monsanto is a company that specializes in GMOs and their applications and the patents that insure lots of money. Monsanto forces farmers into their agreements of use and if they should deny and end up using Monsanto’s patented seeds they find themselves with an excessive lawsuit so unreasonable it is impossible for the farmers to have any other option but agree to their terms. Yves Bertheau and John Davison wrote a case study called Genetically Modified and non-Genetically Modified Food Supply Chains examines the interaction between these seeds, “the simulation model presented...permits an analysis of mechanisms for detecting adventitious transfer of GM material…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Interest groups are defined as an “organized group of people that makes policy-related appeals” and they can have a profound effect on our government and society (Ginsberg, Lowi, and Weir 419).These groups represent their interests in the political arena in a variety of ways; they can get government officials appointed to government positions, lobby government officials, and fund media to advertise their message to mobilize public opinion and sway voters. Businesses interest groups in particular utilize these strategies, because there is an economic incentive in passing favorable laws and conveying a good image to government and the public. One business interest currently benefiting from their interaction with the Obama administration is Monsanto. Monsanto is a billion dollar company responsible for genetically modified seeds, the chemical Roundup and its associated Roundup ready crops, the toxic chemical substance Agent Orange, bovine growth hormones (rBGH), and the synthetic sugar substitute known as aspartame—to name a few. As a business interest group, it has been a terrific success in using government to push its agenda, much to the dismay of environmental activists, scientists, and concerned citizens who want their government to regulate businesses and protect the public. This paper will examine how business interest groups like Monsanto have been able to further their agenda under the Obama administration through the appointment of employees to federal positions, lobbying, and use of media to mobilize public opinion.…

    • 3232 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, the author accuses Westgate for concealing this data from the community. Which identifies a little persuasion that it might be better to not purchase anything at all but instead to plant their own crops so that it will echo in their health that better option is to harvest your own food than to rely on a product that are not beneficial at all. Also, the author states that Monsanto (pg. 408-410), the CEO of the company, produced or invented a form of growing hormone just to increase the production of milk but did not thought of the consequences that is made have on people in the future. This demonstrations that companies can change from manufacturing one product to another and they do not care of the damaging consequence it may have on the consumers body. The author wanted the reader to understand his main opinion that the more you stay away from can goods, or read up on businesses to learn more about what they use in their products, the better it is for individuals.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being a multinational supplier of genetically modified seeds, Monsanto posses severe economic impacts in the international marketplace. Originally, the Bt Cotton seeds should have produced positive externalities upon the Indian economy, however, the enforcement of the biological patent disables the economy from reaching the potential positive effects. Initially, the purpose of the genetically modified cotton seeds were to substantially increase the production of cotton. Higher crop yields would have resulted in cheaper prices for consumerism, as economies of scale would have taken effect. However, as the revenue generated by farmers cannot cover variable costs, a shut down point will be reached within the industry. Farming revenue is irregular…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Caux Round Table Principles for Business there are seven principles that Monsanto should follow when developing them with a global approach that is corporately responsible (Thorne, 2010). The first principle established the basis for respect among all shareholders. The company’s established board of directors should treat all of their stakeholders including employees, customers and investors with the same amount of respect as they would want be provided to them. Monsanto should continue to seek out innovative ways that their employees can better do their jobs and provide more output for the farmers, while maintaining an ethical balance within that does not see shortcuts taken to increase their financial status. If an issue were to arise, they should be up front and honest with all the stakeholders so that they all have the…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What would you do if you knew a company you loved and adored, had horrible and atrocious ethics? Many people don’t realize how many businesses practice poor ethics and get away with unethical behavior. One of the most unethical businesses in the world is Monsanto. Most people would agree that Monsanto has been through hell and back because of their Ethics.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Monsatan and the Bad Seed

    • 2523 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Most Americans are unaware to who Monsanto is and or what Genetically Modified Organisms are, even though they support and eat them nearly every meal. On Saturday, May 25, 2013 I attended the March Against Monsanto that took place in Downtown LA with about 5,000 other supporters, protesting against Monsanto and making strangers aware of what’s currently happening with the future of our food system. This march took place in over 150 cities in 55 countries across the globe and still didn’t make the mainstream media. Less than five percent of people know anything about what they’re really eating, and if they do, they’re more concerned about carbs, sugars and calories rather than where the food actually came from. Monsanto is the world’s largest Biotech and Agrochemical Corporation that specializes in manufacturing products including herbicides, pesticides and patented crop seeds. They have convinced most of humanity, that through innovative science, they’re producing high quality products that are beneficial for the customers and the environment. They also claim that they are committed to safety and health in everything they do, but a lack of government-lead scientific research has…

    • 2523 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keeping in mind the end goal to adjust the enthusiasm of different partner gatherings, we initially need to recognize the different partner's gatherings and break down their needs and desire from Monsanto.The essential partners for Monsanto would be its providers, Customers (the ranchers), shoppers of the nourishment things being fabricated from these seeds, representatives of the organization, speculators, investors, and society in which the organization is operating.All of these or some of these would have a clashing enthusiasm for the exercises of Monsanto, for instance, the financial specialists and investors would be keen on expanded benefits and would bolster any methodology that is bringing benefits for the entity.To the opposite agriculturists…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Monsanto's Greed

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Despite the ongoing, major clinical studies being conducted, the government put their greed before the public’s wellbeing, and granted Monsanto permission to plant genetically modified crops and seeds without the interference of the federal government. With the government stripped of their authority of enforcing GMO sales, Monsanto has broken their chains, and now has full control of the public’s food. If GMO’s are found to be harmful to the consumer’s health, because of this bill, the government will not be able stop Monsanto’s production and distribution. (International Business…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Not only does it increase the milk-producing hormone, rBGH is filled with high levels of the natural growth factor, IGF-1. This is a hormone that if occurs in higher levels, has shown to increase rates health problems in humans (Furstenberger 2002). rBGH is injected into the dairy cows to increase their milk production. As a result of the increased milk production, the cows have been treated with rBGH, have shown increased health problems, the main one being mastitis. The FDA, Federal Drug Administration, commercialized Posilac in 1993, even though it was a controversial drug (FDA). The FDA official, Michael Taylor, a former Monsanto attorney, oversaw the process. Later on he became the Vice President of Monsanto after leaving the FDA (Burton, 1993). The GAO, the Government Accountability Office, made their decision based on summaries of internal tests, which many opposed views claim that it was a summary of manipulative science and lacked data on human health effects (Burton 1993). However, the FDA included a package insert in the Posilac packages listing 16 harmful physical effects on cows (Polisac Insert). This product was originally marketed in the United States, and since 1993 it has been banned in several countries including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and the European Union (American Cancer Society).…

    • 3030 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does Monsanto Cause Health

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    These studies show that the food that Monsanto sells, that is genetically modified have some effects in the humans. These products cause health issues to the human body such as cancer tumors, secondary birth effects and infertility. These seeds had also and deathly effect on some anima, such as the bees, researches have proved that entire colonies of bees have collapsed because of the GMO seeds.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Rise Of Monsanto

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The company’s history was mainly in the chemicals industry. Having started in 1901 as a manufacturer of saccharin; by the 1970’s Monsanto was involved in businesses with oil/gas exploration, the production of acetic acid, plastics, synthetic rubber, resins, polystyrene, polyethylene, insulation, flame retardant materials, and Astroturf. In 1978, agriculture and food processing together accounted for just 17 per cent of the company’s sales. Nowadays, Monsanto is one of the world’s largest seed companies. Although it remains the manufacturer of the world’s best selling herbicide brand and roundup; it has shed its industrial and specialty chemicals divisions. The sweeteners business and even the pharmaceutical subsidiary which it acquired in 1985 is now an agricultural business that focuses on herbicides and seeds and…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays