Preview

Monopoly Subchapter Burton Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
754 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Monopoly Subchapter Burton Summary
In this subchapter Burton writes about how Vanderbilt got his start and became a major player in the steamship industry. It shows that even in the infancy of Vanderbilt's career his practice of embracing competition and making better products for lower prices Vanderbilt was able to beat out the government subsidize companies. Burton starts off by talking about Robert Fulton, a man who ran a government franchise steamship company. Fulton's company was simply Monopoly enforced by the state. One of his competitors Thomas Givens hired Cornelius Vanderbilt the challenge Phil Fulton by charging less than the Monopoly rates. The chapter also talks about the effects of the Gobbins v. Ogden Where the supreme court struck down Fulton monopoly. This sparked a new wave of competition, which brought about technological advancements, lower prices and increased passenger traffic. Vanderbilt soon left his partnership with Miller and moved on to create his own shipping company. In the rest of the subchapter Burton gives examples of different political entrepreneurs and government …show more content…
Something important that i've learned this year is that when government get involved it usually cause competition to decline. The way I see monopolies now is, most of them are government franchises such as ConEd.

3* I've never viewed either of these men as bad men or as robber baron, i've always admires the men of the 19th and 20th century who saw these new industries developing and adapted to make a mostly honest profit. These men were friends of consumers because the put pressure on their competitors to provide better goods and services and reasonable prices. They embraces competition, made good products and sold them for low prices. When companies compete the consumer usually

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cornelius Vanderbilt was born on May 27, 1794 on Staten Island. He belonged to a very poor family and his father earned his living by providing low level transportation services. He entered buiseness at the age of 16 in 1810. He was paid $100 by his mother to clear and plant 8 acres of land. He use the $100 to buy a small vessel and used it to carry frieght and passengers between Manhattan and Staten Island. He quickly got the reputation to be reliable and fearless and he took that reputation with him when he entered the train industry. By the 1840's Vanderbilt had about .3100 steamships and he had become the biggest employer in the United States. Vanderbilt did not only compete with his rival with his low prices but also with comfort, size, speed, luxury and elegance in the steamship passenger transportation industry. In the 1860's Vanderbilt became aware that the big growth in the future for the transportation industry was not by way of water but by way of rail. He became interested is railroad transportation, which was then still in its infancy. Instead of building new railroads, he took the easier route by buying exsisting rail roads. In 1867 he also acquired the Central Railroad and merged it with…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morgan,Rockefeller and Carnegie were robber barons They were considered cruel and ruthless. Carnegie made his employees work long hours and gave them little pay he even tried to stop unions in his company. Employees pointed out that Rockefeller could have paid his workers a fairer wage and settled for being a half billionaire. Morgan criticized for creating monopolies by making it difficult for any business to compete against his.…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gibbons Vs. Ogden Cases

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    The increase of shipping by steamboats led to conflict over waterway rights. Let's start with the Gibbons vs. Ogden case, it was in 1819. When Aaron Ogden sued Thomas Gibbons for operating steamboats in New York that Ogden owned. The Gibbons vs. Ogden case didn't go to the Supreme Court till 1824. Where the the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gibbons, and the federal government reinforce their right to regulate trade between the states by ending the monopolistic control over the waterways in some of the states.After the Supreme Court's dropped the monopolistic control the waterways, more and more companies were traveling over the waterways. That brought prices down and made it more affordable to people to buy there products.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2000 Dbq Analysis

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Carnegie did believe in survival of the fittest and that the rich was more competent and educated than the poor, middle class but, he also believed in aiding the less fortunate in a non-direct way by “ ...bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience and ability to administer,...”(Doc 4). In controlling multiple industries he provided the less fortunate with jobs and work experience, bettering them in a non-direct way. John D. Rockefeller on the other hand believed in boosting himself using horizontal integration, monopolizing the smaller businesses, expanding his industry further and further. Rockefeller once had monopolized almost 90% of the oil and oil refining businesses. He lowered his prices to attract a customer base slowly eliminating all of his competitors by either buying them out or forcing them out of business, to then jack up his prices once he owned most of the industry. Because of his monopoly in the oil industry he and the railroad tycoon Vanderbilt were in league together giving “discriminating rates” to outside , small business competitors (Doc 7). In 1890 the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed to…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1817, Vanderbilt sold his sailing vessels and began working as a steamboat captain partnered with Thomas Gibbons. Soon in the 1820s, he started his own company, building steamships and operating ferry lines around the New York region. Later on in the mid-1840s, he was operating with a fleet over 100 steam boats. In the 1860s, Vanderbilt seized…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.P. Morgan was born into a wealthy family and inherited it, while Vanderbilt went from rags to riches, which definitely makes him a captain of industry. Because of this, it makes sense of how they manage their money as they got older. J.P. Morgan was not driven by a tremendous desire for money but for setting finances right and doing things the right way. Although he did .P. Morgan buy and collect art that was equal in value to about two-thirds of his estate or 900 million dollars today. This makes sense because he was born into a wealthy family so he can be generous with his money because it’s always been there for him. Vanderbilt was more greedy with his money. He never spent his money on improving working conditions, even though they were extremely dangerous.The only thing he spent his money on was $50,000 to the Church of the Strangers and $1 million to Central University, which then became Vanderbilt University and improving the railroads for customers. Other than that, he kept all his money to himself. The reason for that is because he had to work to get to where he was and he didn’t want to lose it all so sometimes he had to play dirty with his money by making cuts and only giving his money to his sons instead of his daughters. He left the bulk of his fortune, estimated at more than $100 million, to his son William…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    businesses and industries. There was John D. Rockefeller and the oil industry, Vanderbilt and the…

    • 600 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cornelius Vanderbilt was one of America’s leading Business tycoons in the early 18th century. Many believed his genius and success as a businessman was contributed to his ability to seize upon opportunities that appeared unexpectedly. Some even thought that because Vanderbilt was so successful, he had planned everything in advance. Born poor , Vanderbilt had used his obvious aptitude for business, and luck to amass his empire, involving himself in the steam engine, both on land and sea. He tried and succeeded in connecting the railway to create a very large monopoly over the railroad system during his lifetime. Being involved in transportation, this was very important because transportation was the most important and lucrative business…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three men, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan, were seen as robber barons BUT they were also seen as industrial statesmen. Robber baron was a term given to the rich who would pretty much do anything for money whether that meant the jeopardy of workers’ lives and crooked business practices. John D. Rockefeller started a standard oil company and was the first American billionaire. John R. was considered a robber baron mainly because he used his insight of business to ruthlessly force other oil and petroleum companies out of business, and whom managed to hide it all from the public. Rockefeller also, asked the railroad for secret rebates, thought only about money, and decisively brought the strongest men to his sides in order to completely envelop other oil and petroleum companies while at the same time taking no ones’ feelings into account. Andrew Carnegie was an industrialist and a philanthropist. Andrew started a steel company that revolutionized steel production. The way Andrew obtained the label of being a robber baron was by the way he ran his company. Although he made tons of money he, paid low wages, his workers suffered horrible and very unsafe conditions, and he took advantage of the government. J.P. Morgan, financier, art collector, and philanthropist. He was criticized for creating monopolies by making it difficult for any business to compete against his. Morgan dominated two industries in particular—he helped consolidate railroad industry in the East and formed the United States Steel Corporation in 1901. With J.P. and how he was considered to be a robber baron was through his tactics. One of the main reasons people considered John Pierpont Morgan as a robber baron was because of his process known as “Morganization.” In this process, he would take over troubled businesses and reorganize them in order to return them to profitability.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robber Barons Men

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page

    These 3 men are robber barons because they all treated their men with disrespect. They made them work in harsh conditions, with low pay, and super long hours. They also discouraged unions between the workers and even tried to stop them.This is showing disrespect by them not letting the workers have a break and time to themselves.What they don't realize is no matter how much they get nagged they aren't going to work to their greatest potential because their worn out.Another thing that's cruel is giving them low pay after working all these hours,they may be doing it to save their own money but out of the millions they have they should be giving them a decent amount of money.With them working their workers so hard, it will make them quit then…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I thought that people like Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.p Morgan were all robber barons. Because they would employ people and put them in these unsafe, and unsanitary conditions. Also they made education for immigrants coming in difficult because even though they built libraries and hospitals would the immigrants would be illiterate and not be able to pay for hospital bills. Lastly theses men were robber barons because they were using vertical integration and horizontal integration to take over small businesses and to raise prices on railroads.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robber Barons Essay

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Business leaders were very greedy and valued profit more than anything. Even safety wasn’t barely considered while the robber barons plotted ways to get rich and control the world. For example, the notorious Credit Mobilier construction company was hired by Congress in 1872 to help build the Union Pacific Railroad. The company had coaxed from Congress much more…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vertical Integration

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Chapter 18: Big Business: Competition and Cooperation in the Late 1800s.” brtprojects.org. N.P, N.D. Web. 7 Jan 2014.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Industrialization DBQ

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These large businesses believed themselves to be the sole provider for the people, whom everyone was dependent on, and thought they were doing the public a huge favor (Document 4). The point of view of Document 4 is from Carnegie, a wealthy industrialist, and is important because although Carnegie preaches the positive effects of industrialization, his main goal is to gain wealth, which he achieves through monopolization and taking advantage of his workers. Creating trusts and monopolies was a popular way for big businesses to control the market and eliminate any competition, and was very common during the time of industrialization. Many small businesses were unable to compete with the large corporations who offered the same goods, but at a much…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As mentioned earlier, during the Gilded Age, there was a belief in monopolies by robber barons of society and taking out businesses. For example, a businessman named John D. Rockefeller known as a robber baron of society during this time period. This was because he ended up taking over the oil business by building trusts. These trusts then made him in control of the entire oil business and eventually eliminating all competing oil businesses. Although, these…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays