The poem, “Monologue for an Onion” written by Sue Kim, the onion is a metaphor and is the whole poem is written about it and based off of it. The basic main viewpoint of the poem is about the feelings and thoughts that onion experiences when being handle by the person or more specifically when it is being cut. The poem revolves around the whole idea of how the onion feels and thinks as the person cuts away at it and how it reflects on the actions of the person and the person themselves. Sue Kim’s poem is also very appealing to those that are new to poetry because of its uncommon subject material and accessibility. The poem can also be analyzed from many different viewpoints, such as the person or the onion itself.
The onion starts the whole poem out by telling the person, who is peeling away layer by layer of its body away, that it does not mean to make the person cry. What this means is that the onion is not intentionally causing the person to cry, despite the fact that the person is harming the onion. The onion then goes on to describing the scene at hand, meaning the scene of the person harming the onion by peeling away its various layers of flesh, as it calls it. The person is then informed of what they truly seek, which is the onion’s heart. The author, Kim, means for this to be irony because of the fact that the onion truly means that the person is seeking their own heart, rather than the onion’s. Looking deeper into the poem, it is clear that the person lacks a center, which is the reason as to why the person strives to find the onion’s center even though they do not realize it. The onion also tells the person of what their heart currently is by saying, “And at your inmost circle, what? A core that is /Not one. Poor fool, you are divided at the heart, /Lost in its maze of chambers, blood, and love.” (Kim 1) The onion essentially states that the person’s hearts is not one, meaning that they are divided and split in many aspects and that they are...
Cited: Kim, Sue. “Monologue for an Onion.” Poetry for Students. Eds. Ira Mark Milne and Anne Marie Hacht. Vol. 24. Detroit: Gale Group, 2006. Print
Please join StudyMode to read the full document