Preview

Mongol And Genghis Khan Trial Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
416 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mongol And Genghis Khan Trial Analysis
Verdict of the Mongol + Genghis Khan Trial Cyril Connolly once said, “The civilized are those who get more out of life than the uncivilized, and for this we are not likely to be forgiven.” As the trial determining whether the Mongols and Genghis Khan are civilized or uncivilized comes to a close, a verdict must be made. Both the defense and prosecution witnesses of both sides delivered convincing and compelling arguments. However, there can be only one verdict. The Mongols and Genghis Khan murdered innocent people, treated everyone with disrespect, and invaded already established civilizations, which made them out to be uncivilized. It is a strong possibility that the Mongol Empire seemed fair and pleased at first, but this obviously was
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Were The Barbarians Dbq Analysis
    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Were The Barbarians Dbq Analysis

    How barbaric were the barbarians? The Mongols were a group of people that lived during the 13th century in central Asia. They expanded their empire throughout most of Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe. The Barbarians were indeed barbaric. Because of their human nature, the Mongols stroke feared in the faces of many people.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary: How Mongols Were The Mongols
    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary: How Mongols Were The Mongols

    The Mongols were very barbaric, their reputation was not pretty, they slaughtered entire cities and left one person alive so they could tell the terrible story.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mongols Webquest
    • 2325 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Mongols Webquest

    It was blinded people from seeing the contributions the Mongols have made to 13th and 14th…

    • 2325 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Exemplary Discipline Shown by Mongol Warriors
    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Exemplary Discipline Shown by Mongol Warriors

    The Mongol army went into battle with a brutal well planned tactic with the intent of causing maximum damage, “I’ll trick them and make them come out in the open. I’ll pretend to retreat and when they come out I’ll attack them,” this contributed greatly to the success of the Mongols (Doc: 1). Marco Polo’s biased description the soldiers stuck out from the documents “their arms are bows, iron maces, and in some instances, spears” (Doc: 3). The fact that Polo was sent by the Mongol ruler to administer the realm contributes to this bias. The warriors of the Mongol army were disciplined “their obedience and submissiveness is such that if there be a commander of a hundred thousand between whom and the Khan there is a distance of sunrise and sunset, and if he but commit some fault, the Khan dispatches a single horseman to punish him” (Doc: 4). A document from the perspective of one of the conquered civilizations would be very useful because it would give insight on how events took place.…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mongol and Chinese Comparison Essay
    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mongol and Chinese Comparison Essay

    The Mongols were fearsome and savage fighters, but had smart and loyal political leaders that gave their small population power. Some of the smartest and loyal leaders were in Persia and china both being at the top of political structures. However the Mongols in china had different beliefs of trusting the natives to have power in politics than the Mongols in Persia did. The political structures in both china and Persia promoted strong merchant trade helping the economy, which made them wealthy strong territories.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Barbaric Dbq Analysis
    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Barbaric Dbq Analysis

    In conclusion, the Mongols were considered barbaric. They had high murder tolls, participated in the destruction of villages, and in the destruction of marriages. They believed in taking control of everything, and killing the people who didn’t follow what they did and believed in. They could have been called a Communist government, but really there was no need for a government for people who killed for world…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did The Mongols Influence China
    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did The Mongols Influence China

    There were many great warriors throughout the Middle Ages, however none so prominent as the Mongols. While the Carolingian “war machine” conquered a sizable expanse of land, it was a miniscule feat when compared to the enormous empire the Mongols ultimately created. Though they prospered for a relatively short period of time, they succeeded in generating a lasting impact. The traditional stereotypes of the 13th century Mongols were influenced by stories from Russia, China, and Persia, which insinuated that the Mongols were barbaric raiders contingent upon destroying everything in their path. This perception is not entirely true, while the Mongols were still a fierce war machine,…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq Analysis
    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mongol Empire Dbq Analysis

    The Mongols were a nomadic people until 1206, when they acknowledged Temujin as the supreme leader, Genghis Khan. A huge empire was created under his rule, linking Eastern and Western Eurasia. An analysis of these documents will discuss the topic of how the Mongols expanded their empire so far in such a short time through their power of violence. This analysis will also show the admiration and respect of the Mongols by others in surrounding regions. Ultimately, this analysis will discuss how the fear from other people gave the Mongols their biggest advantage in conquering other regions to expand their enormous empire.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mongol Empire Research Paper
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mongol Empire Research Paper

    At that time, there were Mongol tribes that lived independently from each other. They beliefs, religion, laws and order separated from each other. They did not want to accept anyone’s religion, laws or beliefs and others did not want to do the same thing in return. When Genghis Khan unified all of the tribes, all of them started to have the same points of view, therefore creating a strong empire.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Did Genghis Khan Impact Society
    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Did Genghis Khan Impact Society

    During his reign as emperor, Genghis Khan killed and ravaged many civilizations and villages, “He was responsible for the deaths of as many as 40 million people.” The amount of people that he is responsible for killing is inconceivable. Genghis Khan would destroy civilizations beyond repair. He wouldn’t leave a single survivor. Genghis Khan took pride in destroying his enemies. He once said, "The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, to drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather into your bosom his wives and daughters." He would not be satisfied with just defeating them in battle. He needed to make it so they could not come back from it. He took joy in truly wrecking all that his opponents stood for. He wanted to see them suffer. After Genghis Khan would destroy a village, “No living thing was spared, including small domestic animals and livestock. Skulls of men, women, and children were piled in large, pyramidal mounds.” He did not care if you were a child, he would kill you. It did not matter if you had wronged him or if you did nothing wrong. He did not even care if you could benefit him, he went to extreme measures to make an example. In order to prove a point, “Temujin's Mongols then defeated the Taichi'ut using a series of massive cavalry attacks, including having all of the Taichi'ut chiefs boiled alive.” Temujin, another name Genghis Khan, would go to extreme lengths to assert his dominance. He would use smart military tactics, and then use barbaric ways to finish them off. This would be his way of sending the message, don’t test…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Barbaric Were The Mongols Essay
    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Barbaric Were The Mongols Essay

    To improve transportation and communication throughout China, “the Mongol emperors built canals” (Halperin). The Mongols were accepting to other people of other religions and believed that “Just as God gave different fingers to the hands so has He given different ways to men” (Rubruck). The citizens of the Mongol Empire “showed considerable respect to each other and are friendly together, and they willingly share their food with each other, although there is little of it” (Plano Carpini). Along with keeping their integrity and not taking anyone but their own belongings, the Mongol citizens were well mannered and deferential to one another. The Mongols improved their empire by understanding the importance of communication and uniting all men, who were and were not their citizens.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mongol Empire Dbq

    Document 4 tells about the Mongol attack on the city of Nishapur. They tried to use everything they had to protect themselves against the Mongols, but they were no match for their vicious ways. By nightfall the city was full of the Mongols, and they were commanded that not even a cat or dog should be left alive. They would sever the heads from bodies and place them all in giant piles according to gender (Doc 4). This shows how ruthless the orders given and soldiers were of the Mongolian army, and how barbaric their thoughts and actions were. The Mongols made sure that after they conquered, no history of them would be just satisfactory (Doc 6). The Mongols also made sure that none of their leaders were short of anything important or any important news. The messengers would ride as much as 250 miles in one day just to make sure the leaders had all the news they needed to know (Doc 8). No messenger would dare to face the wrath of a Mongol who believed he was not aware of everything of importance.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    trail of ghenus khan
    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    trail of ghenus khan

    In this trial of Mr. Genghis Khan (Johnny) vs. Mr. Genghis Khan not being civilized, I believe that the Mongol Warrior (Adam) helped bring out the fact that Mr. Khan was indeed innocent of this accusation. This Mongol warrior brought forth the fact that they did indeed give the civilizations a chance to surrender to the Mongols. The Mongol warrior also acknowledged the laws that Mr. Khan had made, (This was backed up by the Historian Juvaini (Rachel) and the research that was done by that person). He also brought forth the fact that, many people thought that there warfare, was part of being civilized, but when we asked the prosecuting witnesses, (the ones before the Mongol Warrior was called up), what the definition of being civilized was, many of the prosecuting witnesses did not involve warfare into their definition of being civilized. The Mongol warrior also helped us when the other prosecuting attorneys tried to ask him questions that were related to warfare, instead of being related to the main question, “is Mr. Khan civilized?”, we then brought them to a dead end, with us (the defensive attorney’s) putting objections towards their questions, because their question’s had nothing to do with the main topic of the trial. The prosecuting side then ran out of questions to ask, due to irrelevance of the questions that they were asking.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mongols as Villians
    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mongols as Villians

    The Mongols were some of the most innovative and intelligent people of their time. They were also some of the most vicious and barbaric villains of the 13th century. With genius war tactics and fearless warriors, they were the most advanced villains of their time period. Using cruel methods of punishment, such as boiling their warriors, showed clear evidence of barbaric activity. While using those cruel methods they also had intelligent ways of biological warfare such as catapulting plague ridden bodies over the walls of Caffa at the Siege of 1346. While many of their actions were truly barbaric, they were very successful in conquering most of China. Although they were most definitely not heroes, they were much more successful in war and conquering seeing that they conquered more land in 25 years than the Romans did in 400 years.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trials in 'the Trial of Dedan Kimathi'
    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Trials in 'the Trial of Dedan Kimathi'

    The trial of dedan kimathi is an excellent example of Agit-prop theatre. This kind of theatre first emerged in 1920 in Soviet Union with the aim of instigating…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics