In this essay I am going to tell you some main points and reasons why William the conqueror won the battle of Hastings that was fought on October 14th 1066.…
6. How did European monarchs increase their power in the early modern era? What are some of the common characteristics of the new monarchs?…
The first argument as to why William won the battle of Hastings, is that he had the bet army. The Normans had 7500 men, all fully trained compared to the 4500 village workers and only 500 professionally trained soldiers that made up Harold’s army. Also, William had many archers that could kill from 100 meters way. The Normans were also equipped with blacksmiths, carpenters, medics and cooks as well as a few mercenaries, who were professional soldiers that fought for whoever paid them the most amount of money, on his side. Williams’s men also had better weapons and armour, for example: the cavalry were all equipped with mail hauberk, there is some evidence some of the archers used crossbows in addition to bows and arrows, some battle maces were also used along with spears and swords, round and kite shaped shields mean that the Normans were more protected from the English. Another benefit that William had was his great leadership skills.…
There was an incredibly large fleet of warfare ships, which were used to transport me, the duke and other soldiers who fought in the war. The ship used by William was commonly known as the Mora, and it was the biggest from among the other ships. People close to Duke William said that the ship was a gift from his wife who was called Mathilda. The ship was extremely fast. Apart from the duke, there were other leaders, such as Odo, the Bishop of Bayeux. The number of soldiers was around seven thousand men. In Norman culture, the first born son inherits all the properties of the family, the rest of the sons are left to fend for themselves, unless the first born son decides to share his wealth with them. Most of the time, these sons choose to serve in war. This explains the excessive number of Norman soldiers. There were also other supporters of the duke that had come to support him, bringing with them able men to fight in the war. Bishop Odo came with the Bretons. There were also the French, who had been urged to join in the war by William. In return for their service to the duke, they were promised pieces of land. There were the Flemish as well, who would also get pieces of land.…
1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…
William’s men also had better armour and weapons, for example there is some evidence that archers used crossbows in addition to bows and arrows, were also used along with spears and swords, round shields and kite shaped shields. This meant that the Normans were more protected from the English, than the English were from them as well as having weapons that could do more damage. Another benefit that William had as one of his skills was that he was a very good commander of his troops and organised his men very well.…
When Edward came into power in 1042, England was in a poor state financially and also because of threats of an invasion and this made the first few years of his rule difficult. Edward was faced with many problems which he had to overcome. These problems involved; powerful Earls, (especially the Godwine’s), the foreign policy and the domestic policy. Edward both failed and succeeded in these problems due to a number of factors. These include a lack of knowledge about his kingdom and some may argue that he was naïve in his decisions. With some evaluation, we will be able to judge if Edward was a successful King or not.…
William was able to employ many different forms of the existing Anglo-Saxon English government and use them differently to his advantage. William was able to utilize the predominantly Norman royal household (remaining from Edward the Confessor’s reign), which was already the centre of government and develop this further by rewarding any Normans who had advised or helped during his conquest of England, therefore increasing the number of people from Norman origin in his court. By doing this William was able to surround himself with trusted advisors. This itself was not a complete turnaround as there had already been a strong influence of Norman culture in the royal household of Edward the confessor, who himself had been born in Normandy.…
Before William had conquered and set up the Feudal arrangement in England, they had no proper established government. Because of this they were constantly being attacked by Vikings and other ‘barbarians’ plus they didn’t work in harmony with each other as it was. So, this system of Feudalism was very significant to England and William.…
Apparently it was said that on King Edward's death bed, Edward promised to him that he would be able to take care of his wife and of his kingdom. But Harald Hardrada and William of Normandy say otherwise. William, Duke of Normandy, won the Battle of Hastings on the 14th of October 1066. One of the main reasons he achieved this was because he was very well prepared. In this essay I will explain further how William won the Battle of Hastings in 1066.…
From taxes, William was able to build his city, making it greater. William has built some of the greatest castles ever. The castles he built were used for his own leisure and for civilian protection. During battle he would hold safe hold for the people in these castles. Though thanks to the castles William look more threatening; there’s a huge reason to believe there were less attacks and uprising just because of the castles. The castles gave everyone a sense of security, the people knew they were part of a great country, lead by a great ruler.…
This battle caused a huge change in the environment and government policies. A major significance in this event was the amount of lives that were taken based on a petty battle. Up to at least 10,000 men were believed to have died in this battle, it is yet to be true since there is no leftover evidence of bodies buried. In my own opinion, the question I continue to ask myself is, Why was Harold Godwinson’s army so unprepared knowing William’s constant anger toward the fact he was not in power. Reasons why Harold was unprepared as because Duke William had attacked before they were properly ready. While in battle, some of his best fighters as died in the previous battle, The Battle of Stamford Bridge, and the rest of soldiers were tired from the battle and the journey south. While in battle, the English were holding it together but the Normans tricked the English by pretending of retreat back. The English followed behind, leading their strong position on a hill, but then Harold Godwinson had died. In the event of his death, his army grew weak and ended up losing the battle. In this battle though, William was extremely lucky and only truly won based on the trick he played on the English during the battle. When William conquered the Normans, he completely had begun a new policy. Though, William wasn't fully English he still brought his native tongue to the English court. Some forms of French would remain the…
Before William even began preparing to invade, there was a great debate on whether or not the Normans should risk invading England, as it was quite a strong country at the time. William of Normandy won the battle because was well prepared and had a good army. The Normans had knights on horseback who were skilful fighters.…
In his quest to wrestle the throne of England from Harold, William had gathered an army of some 7,000 – 8,000 men, including calavary, Bretons, archers and men at arms. Yet on their first attempt they were denied access to the English coast because the wind was blowing in the wrong direction!…
We were interested in these questions because we decided that by gaining knowledge about the influential monarchs during that time, our understandings of monarchical governments and power distribution in an era of declining respect towards monarchs would improve. At first, we had several monarchs in mind, but eventually, we narrowed our options into the most influential monarch in the Victorian Era, Queen Victoria. As a result, we chose to discuss and focus inquiries about her reign and other related matters.…