Preview

Moms.com: Analysis of Integrative Negotiations

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moms.com: Analysis of Integrative Negotiations
In the "Moms.com" negotiation, I played the role of a representative of an international multimedia corporation looking to perform a syndication sale of one of our top rated shows. The corporation had determined that one station in particular provided the best potential for the largest profit. It was my task to "get the best deal possible" with this station. I prepared for the negotiation by creating a spreadsheet, which allowed me to go over multiple package combinations until I found what I thought to be the best deal under the restrictions placed on me by my corporation. After negotiations began, I quickly discovered that my "best deal", was really my best profit, and that this package would not work for the buyer. After discussing our needs & wants, we were able to work out an agreeable deal that turned out to be the best in the class. This paper covers the importance of exchanging information for integrative agreements, and provides ideas on the types of questions negotiators should ask to maximize efficiency.

Fisher and Ury (1991) say that "without communication there is no negotiation." Communicating by willingly providing information and asking questions develops the relationship and trust between all parties. By sharing information, a negotiator encourages perspective taking and improves the quality of the agreement (class notes, 17/09/04). By gathering information, a negotiator is better able to identify where the value is (Thompson, 2004), and may see potential trades & deals that can maximize the pie (class notes, 17/09/04).

Sharing information does not mean that a negotiator must share his/her BATNA or specific costs and benefits. However, one may elect to share other information such as his/her interests and/or priorities. Providing information assists in developing a "win-win" negotiation (class notes, 17/09/04). In the "Moms.com" negotiation, I began the trust building processes by sharing the hard limits placed upon me by the corporation on the



References: Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Shell, G. (1999). Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People Thompson, L. (2004). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator, 3rd Edition.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this scenario, Sharon and Jim would need to utilize integrative bargaining to ensure that they would be able to accommodate the needs of the position and the strict guidelines that must be adhered to. Also, using this method it will allow for the both of them to come to a common ground and listen to each other to see what will please him as well as the company. With integrative bargaining, the main goal is to achieve the win for both parties within the negotiation process. The text states that there are several key factors that should addressed in order to gain the win. One must creating a free flow of information, attempting to understand the other negotiator’s real needs and objectives, emphasizing commonalities between parties, and searching for solutions that meet the goals and objectives of both parties.(Lewicki, Saunders, Barry 2014). Creating a free flow of information allow Jim and Sharon to become creative in finds ways to communicate ways that his degree, knowledge and experience, that he has gain from other competitors can help Sharon and the company as a whole. In the negotiation process, it is important to understand the other party’s real needs and objectives so that everyone is clear on what the other expects and how they can both take advantage of a win-win situation. They must also search for solutions that are fair, ethical, firm yet flexible enough that the parties can see the benefit that can come from the negotiation.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    City of Middlevale

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In negotiations there are key stakeholders. These are usually the parties that have the most to gain or lose in the…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Negotiation plan Moms Com

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Junior high expectation would be for $25K/Episode Target decision-maker: Kim Taylor and other top management of WHCI.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Artful Negotiating

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Roy J. Lewicki, Bruce Barry, David M. Saunders, Negotiation, 6th edition (2010), McGraw Hill Publishing.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cell Phone Negotiations

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negotiation offers many things, which can affect how the negotiations will end. Factors play a big part in how parties work to achieve an outcome. Things like studying the opponent give insight on how the process will play out. Not only is the bargain range important to both parties but also each party should look at the other party’s gender differences, personality, culture, perception, cognition, and emotion.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Being a good negotiator isn't just useful in business environment. In fact, mastering negotiation skills will help in every aspect of my life. In my studies, I can be confident to express and share my opinions with others’ especially in group discussion. In the future, I would have a successful negotiation with my college even the manager with these tactics’ guideline.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Getting to Yes! Book Report

    • 4532 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Getting to YES, Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In is an excellent book that discusses the best methods of negotiation. The book is divided into three sections that include defining the problem, the method to solve it, and possible scenarios that may arise when using these methods. Each section is broken down into a series of chapters that is simple to navigate and outlines each of the ideas in a way that is easy for any reader to comprehend. There are also several real life explanations for each issue that make the concepts easier to apply and understand. These ideas are reflective of a method developed by the Harvard Negotiation Project called “principled negotiation”. This method combines the two ideas of soft and hard negotiation in a way that looks at the negotiation objectively and separates the negotiator from the issue. By looking at the negotiation and separating personally from it, the best outcomes for both parties are likely to occur. To further explain, below is an outline of the principled negotiation method divided in the same manner as the text with real life applications of these methods and how they can benefit my professional life personally.…

    • 4532 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bus 340 Assignment 3

    • 2349 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Ted Majors, Jr. February 17, 2013 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the need for an effective negotiator to plan, organize, direct, and control a negotiation. This paper will describe the skills and behavior needed for effective negotiations. An understanding of various negotiating strategies or tactics and how they can be applied in varying types of negotiations will be demonstrated. Technology and information resources will be used to research issues in business administration.…

    • 2349 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negotiation Plan

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Negotiating is the art of convincing the other side that you should get what you want. Knowing what you want from a negotiation is only a small part of what it takes to be prepared. The key to success is knowing how you are going to get what you want (Egan, 2008). This outline will indicate a negotion plan from the position of Washington Bullets Manager, Wes Unseld, in the negotiation battle between NBA Basketball Star, Juwan Howard, Miami Heat General Manager, Pat Riley, and Howard’s agent, David Falk.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contract Negotiation Paper

    • 5201 Words
    • 21 Pages

    By Joseph Brick 1 ABSTRACT Integrative bargaining is a highly effective means of negotiating an agreement. However, it is also an underutilized method. Although there has been a recent focus on the topic in the past thirty years, the factors which deem it beneficial are still little understood. What this paper attempts to set forth is an explanation of why integrative bargaining is a successful and desirable method of negotiating. With a better understanding of why integrative bargaining is effective, negotiators may be better able to utilize this method to its full potential. This paper culminates with a suggestion on how to best exploit this new understanding. Research up to this point has suggested that integrative bargaining is desirable due to the increasing the pie rationale. The contention set forth in this paper is that there are alternative factors driving integrative bargaining. Exploration of this theory begins with an analysis of whether integrative bargaining is driven by the interjection of equity principals into what was traditionally a law driven enterprise, that of negotiation. It is argued that the stability of contract which results from an earlier application of equitable principals in the negotiating process is just as crucial to integrative bargaining as the desire to increase the pie. With this conclusion, it becomes apparent that solutions which encourage integrative bargaining will result in more stable contracts. The increased stability rationale holds true even where there is no increase in the fixed sum negotiation. Integrative bargaining is thus shown to be desirable in all cases. To encourage the stability of contract, this paper concludes with the suggestions that mandatory disclosure laws be adopted to help encourage the use of integrative bargaining.…

    • 5201 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    130 Van Boven, Gilovich, and Medvec The Illusion of Transparency in Negotiations Savitsky, K. 1997. Perceived transparency of and the leakage of emotional states: Do we know how little we show? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University. Thompson, L. 1990. An examination of naïve and experienced negotiators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 26: 528-544. ———. 1991. Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27: 161-179. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124-1131. Vorauer, J. D. and S. Claude. 1998. Perceived versus actual transparency of goals in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24: 371-385.…

    • 5951 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Self Negotiation Strategy

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Reflecting on my Communication Skills Negotiation is an everyday fact of life and it is bound to occur whenever two parties have differing opinions and they need to seek a middle ground. Devoid of communication lines, there can be no negotiation. Therefore, this rule is essential. Lines of communication are the life-blood of a negotiation. Master negotiators foster their communication lines, and where lines are weak, they seek to develop new ones. Developing rapport with the other party eases the stress of negotiating and improves the likelihood of a successful outcome. This is especially crucial in instances where the parties will have a long-term relationship after negotiations closure (Noble, 2001). This essay seeks to reflect on my own negotiation style from which I will develop a plan to improve my personal negotiation skills based…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negotiation Strategy Article Analysis Paper Andres Zangara MGT/445 University of Phoenix Every negotiation starts with a process followed by a strategy because without either, then it would be just a disagreement with any kind of resolution to the issue. Making sure that you get what you set out for is important but does not necessarily mean that the other person has to lose in the negotiation so making sure to go through the process and then coming up with a strategy ensures that all parties come out with a win-win rather than a win-lose negotiation.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some researchers have suggested that in negotiations, collaborative style is the most effective, but the truth is that it may be too overbearing for the negotiations (Brett, 1984). While collaborating, one is most often to share all the information to arrive at a satisfactory solution. However, information is rarely shared until trust is established. As a result, negotiators adopt a cautiously collaborative style in the beginning, slowly trying to find out whether the other party will share the information that it knows. This also helps build trust (Fells, 1993). If trust is not established, negotiators shift to the win-lose style of negotiation from the win-win style, there by trying to maximize their returns.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negotiation Myths Myth

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator Leigh L Thompson Chapter 1: Essentials of Negotiations 1. Creating Value - Win-Win Negotiation 2. Claiming Value - Staying in Business! 3. Building Trust - Long-term sustainability Negotiations Sandtraps 1. Leaving Money on the table (Lose-Lose Negotiation) 2. Settling for too little (Winnerʼs Curse) 3. Walking away form the table 4. Settling for terms that are worse than the alternative (Agreement Bias) Why People are Ineffective Negotiators - Faulty Feedback - Satisficing - Self-reinforcing incompetence Negotiation Myths Myth 1: Negotiations are Fixed Sum Myth 2: You Need to be either Tough or Soft (Principled negotiator follow an ʻenlightenedʼ view of negotiation) Myth 3: Good Negotiators are Born Myth 4: Experience is a Great Teacher Myth 5: Good Negotiators Take Risks Myth 6: Good Negotiators Rely on Intution Chapter 2: Preparation - What t do before Negotiation 80% - Preparation + 20% Negotiation process Excellent Preparation encompasses 1. Self Assessment a. What Do I Want ? b. What is my Alternative to reaching agreement in this Situation ? c. Determine Your Reserve Point d. Be Aware of Focal Points e. Beware of Sunk Costs f. Do not confuse Target Point with your Reserve Point g. Identify the Issues in the Negotiations h. Identify the Alternatives to each issue i. Identify Equivalent Packages of Offers j. Assess You Risk Propensity k. Endowment Effects l. Am I Going to Regret This ? m.Violations of the Sure thing Principle n. Do I have an appropriate Level of Confidence…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays