Mohandas Gandhi emphasizes the use of non-violence in his speech and employs the principle of "spiritual leadership...to achieve political goals through non-violent resistance."(Gandhi 975) Gandhi's essay accents the need for Indian freedom. Gandhi's attitude stressed for the British system of government to change. Gandhi states the overall attitude of the essay, "I wanted to avoid violence, I want to avoid violence. Nonviolence is the first article of my faith. It is also the last article of my creed." (Gandhi 976) Gandhi writes this to state his belief in nonviolent forms of rebellion. Instead, Gandhi's belief that peaceful measures harvest a greater impact on the people creates a greater outcome. Gandhi decides to go against the government of the land, the British government. Gandhi states, "But I had to make my choice. I had either to submit to a system which I considered had done an irreparable harm to my country, or incur the risk of the mad fury of my people bursting forth, when they understood the truth from my lips" (Gandhi 976). Clearly, Gandhi's attitude towards British rule played into a negative path of rebellion which eventually led to his arrest and future Indian independence.
George Orwell does not stir up any rebellions with the government; however, Orwell plays a major role in British Government in India. "I was subdivisional police officer of the town, and in an aimless, petty kind of way anti-European feeling was very bitter" states Orwell (Orwell 939). Even though Orwell ranks highly in the British system, as did Gandhi at one time, Orwell and Gandhi do not agree with the system they work for. Proof of Orwell's sentiment, "In a job like that you see the dirty work of Empire at close quarters" (940) provides the reader with Orwell's attitude towards government. Although Orwell does not comply with the system, Orwell continues to work under the government.
Gandhi states many times that the system of rule does not justify the people in India. Insight into many historical events, provided in Gandhi's speech allows the reader to view great details of the continuing pressures of Indian injustice. Gandhi addresses his first moment of resentment into the British system, "The first shock came in the shape of the Rowlatt Act, a law designed to rob the people of all real freedom"(Gandhi 977). The tone of the passage begins to rise into disaffection from this moment forward. Later in the speech, Gandhi directly accuses the British system, " I came reluctantly to the conclusion that the British connection had made India more helpless than she ever was before, politically and economically" (Gandhi 978). Gandhi's attitude towards the system causes him to stir up a rebellion and thus, go upon a judge to suffer a sentence of six years in prison.
Orwell and Gandhi contrast in attitudes when they separate into different sides of the system. Gandhi realizes the British rule in India only oppresses his people, while Orwell is a police officer that essentially performs any and all tasks assigned to him, regardless of virtue or morality. When Orwell solves the problem of shooting a ravaging elephant, the British government proudly acknowledges the act. "Besides, legally I had done the right thing, for a mad elephant has to be killed," writes Orwell (Orwell 945). Orwell, in many ways, disagrees with shooting, but in the end of the story, Orwell writes, "I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool"(Orwell 945). Orwell's attitude is somewhat hypocritical because he does not agree with the killing, but does it anyway so he can please his superiors. Gandhi, who once worked successfully as a servant to the British government, comes to a conclusion that the system can no longer oppress his people. Gandhi turns into a political, spiritual leader in the cause to gain Indian freedom and independence. Gandhi goes before a judge and clearly states his reasons why the judge and the system must go. Gandhi tells the judge, "if you believe that the system and the law you are assisting to administer are good for the people of this country and that my activity is therefore injurious to the public weal" (Gandhi 979).
The speech made by Mohandas Gandhi before a judge, under the British system, speaks for itself. Gandhi provides reasons why the system failed to suit the needs of his people. George Orwell writes about the innocent, yet mandated shooting of an elephant, brought upon by the system. Both writers describe their events with comparing and contrasting attitudes. When comparing the attitudes Gandhi who at one time worked under the system with full allegiance, goes before the system and rejects it completely, while Orwell works under the system but does not question it under authority. When contrasting their overall attitudes towards the system, Orwell continues to work as a British official, but deep down inside, knows the oppressive nature of the system. Orwell's attitude is hypocritical, while Gandhi chooses to fight the system.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
On the other hand, the story "Shooting an Elephant” was wrote by George Orwell base on his personal experience in Moulmein, in Lower Burma .He served his country, "British Empire as a colonial administrator. The author described the effects on the oppressed Burmese Indians and theirs oppressor British Empire. The internal conflict of British men, his feelings and convictions linked to his pride from of the angry crowd. Shooting an Elephant is more than a personal experience story, is a reflection of the dilemmas of morals standards in real life and the costs that it represent as a human been and his nature as well .…
- 579 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Shooting an Elephant” was written by George Orwell, and it describes an incident he experienced during the time he spent in a small town in India, as a police officer serving the British Empire. I found the writing interesting because of Orwell’s use of rhetorical strategies that slowly build up to the conclusion of the story, along with the peak of the action. The story ends in a detailed description of an anecdote Orwell thought of while shooting the elephant that was terrorizing the town he was positioned in. Throughout the writing, we can find different rhetorical strategies that indicate Orwell’s very careful choice of different images to get his message through.…
- 941 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Mohandas Gandhi’s methods not only led to India’s independence from Britain but also had victories over racial discrimination in South Africa. Gandhi saw, upon his return to India from South Africa, that Britain had run India’s people into poverty and subordination. Indians were not allowed to manufacture or own their own salt. This affected the poor population most because of how often they used salt. Gandhi began by writing to the English Governor in India describing his plan to “convert the British people through nonviolence and [to] make them see the wrong they have done to India” (Document 1). He felt that the “British rule [was] a curse”. Even though Gandhi spent a total of 2.338 days in prison, he “did not feel the slightest hesitation in entering the prisoner’s box” (Doc. 7). People followed Gandhi in his protests and many followed him into jail feeling “firm in [their] resolution of passing [their] terms in jail in perfect happiness and peace” (Doc. 7). While he was in jail, Mme. Naidu, an Indian poetess, filled in his position in leading protests. She encouraged the protesters by reiterating that “[they] must not use any violence… [they would] be beaten but [they] must not resist…not even raise a hand to ward off blows” (Doc. 4). The author felt that “the western mind finds it difficult to grasp the idea of nonresistance”, but…
- 797 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant" is an essay about a British police officer living in Lower Burma who goes through the trial and error process of making the right decisions while still trying to maintain an image and position of authority. The officer is hated by the Burmese people, which is clearly shown when he would play football. The Burmese were extremely unfair to the officer due to the fact he was part of the Imperialist group which was oppressing Burma. (para. 1) Although the officer is hated he feels "Imperialism, [is] an evil thing" and he "[is] all for the Burmese and against their oppressors, the British," his own kind. (para. 2)…
- 573 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
To be liked by others is a very controversial term. In George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” the “sahib” struggles as he battles himself in a self destroying and virtue deciding internal conflict. This mental battle is one that all must eventually endure. There is no definitive solution as all choices lead to new problems and consequences. The “sahib” wants to gain acceptance by the crowd behind him. By portraying his mental struggle, Orwell gives the character a common ground for his readers to connect with him, but in doing this he also shows the flaws in the “sahib” which could deter the reader from showing affection toward him.…
- 419 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The practice of Ahimsa is one that Gandhi was most well-known for and is essentially the living by the concept of "non-violence"1. This means that instead of fighting violence with violence, Gandhi argued that exploitation could be overcome by returning love for hatred and respect for contempt, in a determined refusal to give in to injustice2. In explaining his theory Gandhi stated "I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent"3. He put his theory into action throughout various campaigns in his fight of social injustice such as the Salt March campaign. Another one of which being the Quit India movement which became the most violent movements in the struggle of India's freedom. The protest resulted in mass arrests and violence on an unprecedented scale4. However Gandhi wanted his disciples to follow the principles of Ahimsa and therefore the violence received was not reciprocated and resulted in the only non-violent liberation of a country. This practice often involved a…
- 1019 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
George Orwell wrote “Shooting an Elephant” to teach readers about imperialism and its effects on not only those ruled but also those charged with maintaining order above them. Orwell’s narrator is a British colonial official stationed in Burma who is charged with keeping the local populace from rioting. The officer speaks of how he is frightened by the Burmans and even by his own people rulers. Fear is one of the ways that Orwell shows that imperialism affects the rulers. Also shown is that the “conquered” feel anger towards their rulers; we learn that the Burmans take their frustrations out on the British officers. Orwell uses the tale of “Shooting any Elephant”…
- 812 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
George Orwell, from a first person narrative perspective of a British officer in Moulmein, Burma, writes an autobiographical essay titled Shooting an Elephant, confessing the inner conflict of a British police officer. From his experience in British-ruled India in the early Twentieth Century, his essay shows feelings in the area and the East against Europe, and faults of the imperialism. While he was there he is having to do something that caused ethical conflicts within himself, and we see it still does from the way he wrote his essay. Our narrator reveals the most significant event in his career as a police officer, which was a "must" to shoot an elephant causing a rampage in the village which destroyed truck, a hut, and a villager. Even villagers gets upset about the ordeal, but he is ordered…
- 1126 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Eric Arthur Blair, who used the pen name George Orwell, was a British writer whose literature is marked by criticism of social injustice. The essay “Shooting an Elephant” is one of George Orwell’s most well-known works. The essay was wrote in 1936, it describes a story what happened in 1926, while Orwell was working as a British police officer in Burma, where in order to build the role of an assertive police officer and a brave white man, he has to shoot an aggressive elephant. He is conflicted with his character as a white, male officer and the morality deep inside his heart. Meanwhile he has to compare the influences of his act in local culture and his own culture, and he uses the story of shooting an elephant as a metaphor for the relation between the ruler and the colony. In other words, the decision to shoot the elephant was affected by the political condition, the conflicting culture, and his attitude of imperialism.…
- 1121 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout Orwell's literary career, he avidly stood against totalitarian and imperialistic forms of government. His two most famous works (1984 and Animal Farm) both exemplify this point, but at the same time weaken it. These two works were written in protest of those governments, but in a fictional back ground. In Orwell's essay Shooting an Elephant, he uses a personal experience to more clearly emphasize the impact of imperialism at the sociological and psychological level, in conjunction with other literary elements. This symposium of devices help drive the purpose of his paper and ultimately creates a more substantial impact on any reader.…
- 763 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“And it was at this moment, as I stood there with the rifle in my hands, that I first grasped the hollowness, the futility of the white man’s dominion in the East.“ . This quotation from the short story “Shooting an Elephant” shows the impact of the British Empire on India during the colonial period. The main character, who is a British police officer, serving in Burma shows a big hatred to both sides. We follow him develop into shooting an Elephant.…
- 1031 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Mohandas Gandhi was a lawyer who practiced in colonial South Africa and eventually led a nonviolent revolution for Indian independence. Gandhi was taught from birth to value all life as holy and respect all religions. The British controlled India for 200 years and Gandhi resented the British influence on his country, and wanted people to live freely. Although Gandhi could have chosen other methods to achieve Indian independence, his nonviolent civil disobedience, willingness to be incarcerated, and not viewing Britain as an enemy, led to an India independent from British rule.…
- 548 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There was also a similar recognition of the violent nature of colonisation and the colonisers. (Gandhi, 1909) However, instead of focusing on violence in his work, as Fanon did, he turned to the complete antithesis of it: ahimsa, or non-violence. This may have been in part due to Gandhi’s pacifist religious upbringing, which had a strong influence in his later life.(history.co.uk, 2013.). Another possible factor was in the colonial paradigm in India, where Gandhi was recognised for his life’s work in decolonizing her. British involvement in India began with the intent of commerce through the East India Company. It became so lucrative to the British Empire that the revenue from trade, and subsequently taxation, was “approaching that of Britain itself”(Marshall, 1996). Therefore, it can be argued that the primary reason for the colonisation of India was to secure Britain’s economic interests. This was recognised by Gandhi, who wrote to the Viceroy of India that “If the British commerce with India is purified of greed, you will have no difficulty in recognising our independence”(Khipple, 1947). Thus, it may have appeared to Gandhi that if India stopped becoming profitable for the British, which was possible through non-violent civil disobedience, they may be…
- 1836 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence (ahimsa) and non-violent action (satyagraha) is constituted by a number of fundamental principles. Thomas Berton, having dedicated his life being drawn into a dialogue between Eastern and Western religions and viewpoints, has made a lot of research on the matter. In his book entitled “Gandhi on Non Violence: A Selection from the Writings of Mahatma Gandhi” he insightfully states that “Ahimsa (non violence) is for Gandhi the basic law of our being” (23). Based on this notion, Berton argues that non violence is one of the most valuable beliefs when it comes to public action, because it matches up to man’s instinctive craving for peace, justice, freedom etc. (23). The main principles of Gandhian non violence are respect for other people, understanding, acceptance of the differences of others, appreciating and celebrating diversity, truth and truthfulness, dealing with untruth wherever one finds it, and soaking up pain and agony from any altercation with untruth.…
- 818 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“A 'No ' uttered from the deepest conviction is better than a 'Yes ' merely uttered to please, or worse, to avoid trouble.” (Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi) These immortal words were uttered by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi or Gandhi as most know him today. Gandhi was an advocate of nonviolence, he was at the forefront of the Free India movement of the 1930’s and 40’s and played an integral part in India becoming an independent nation. This essay will focus on a few of Gandhi’s many achievements, it will look at how for the time period his philosophy of non-violent protest was considered a radical concept and how this philosophy of non-violence not only helped free India from British rule but also inspired protest and civil disobedience the world over. To begin this essay will take a brief look at the life of the man born Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi.…
- 2800 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays