Preview

Module P58836 Literature review

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2791 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Module P58836 Literature review
Module: Financial research project P58836

Critical literature review on Mergers and Acquisitions

Lu Sun 13123963

Date: 7 April 2014

Contents

1. Abstract………………………………………………............3
2. Introduction………………………………………….............3
3. Literature review……………………………….……………4 3.1 The analysis performance of acquisition……………..5
3.11 Short-term analysis……………………………..5-6
3.12 Long-term analysis……………………………..6-8 3.2 Methodologies assessment…………………………..8-9 3.3 Real motivation for acquisition……………………....9-10
4. Conclusion…………………………………………..........10-11
5. References……………………………………….............12-17
6. Appendix…………………………………………………..18-19

1. Abstract

This paper provides a critical literature review on mergers and acquisitions activities over the past decades. In the short run, researches on the previous studies shows that there is insignificant increasing in shareholders’ value. Furthermore, the significant negative return was discovered to investors in the long run, even all of these are based on limited methodologies. Also, the real motivation for different types of takeover is discussed for which one is likely to increase shareholders’ value, and the method of payment is analyzed in terms of impact of investors’ value.

2. Introduction

Over the past decades, acquisition can be seen as an essential driven for entities’ strategic restructure and renewal (Jemison and Sitkin, 1986). A lot of efforts have been made by many scholars to conduct surveys on efficiency and advantages of acquisition. Some motives involved to carry out acquisition include to produce more benefits for directors (Meeks et al., 1977), to improve cost efficient as redundancy of multifunction departments by gaining synergy and to make current market share enlargeable so that creating more market value, eventually, to lead shareholders to maximize their value (Salter and Weinhold, 1979). Nevertheless, there are many academic papers hold an apposed view on this subject such as



References: Asquith, P. (1983). Merger bids, uncertainty and stockholder returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, pp. 51–83. Asquith, P. and Mullins Jr. D.W. (1986). Equity issues and offering dilution. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1-2), pp. 61-89. Berkovitch, E. B. and Narayanan, M. P. (1993). Motives for takeovers: An Empirical Investigating. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), PP. 347-362. Bhagat, S., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1990). Hostile takeovers in the 1980s: The return to corporate specialization. Brookings papers on economic activity: Microeconomics, 1990, 1-84. Bhagat, S.; Dong, M.; Hirshleifer, D.; and Noah, R. (2005). Do tender offers create value? New methods and evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(1), pp. 3-60. Campa, J.M. and Hernando, I. (2004). Shareholder value creation in European M&A. European Financial Management, 10(1), pp.47–81. Carpenter, M. A. and Sanders, WM. G. (2002). Top management team compensation: the missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), pp.367-375. Datta, D. K. and Grant. J. H. (1990). Relationship between type of acquisition, the autonomy given to the acquired firm, and acquisition success: an empirical analysis. Journal of Management, 16(1), PP. 29-44. Datta,D.K.(1991).Organizaion fit and acquisition performance: effects of post-acquistion integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.281-297. Dodd, P. (1980). Merger proposal, management discretion and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(2), pp.105–138. Eckbo, E.B. (2009). Bidding strategies and takeover premiums: A review. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, pp. 149-178. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), pp. 383-417. Firth, M. (1980). Takeovers, shareholders returns and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(2), pp.235-260. Franks, J. and Harris, R.S. (1989). Shareholder wealth effects of corporate takeovers: the U.K. experience 1955–1985. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), pp. 225–249. Gist, M.E (1987). Self-Efficany: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of management review, 12(3), pp. 472-485. Goergen,M. and Reneboog, L. (2004). Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and cross-border takeover bids. European financial management, 10(1), pp. 9-45. Gregory, A. (1997). An examination of the long run performance of UK acquiring firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 24(7-8), pp.971–1002. Gregory, A. and McCorriston, S. (2005) Foreign acquisitions by UK limited companies: short- and long-run performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 12(1), pp.99–125. Gupta, A. and Misra, L. (2004). Deal size, premium paid and the gains in financial mergers: the impact of managerial motivation. Working Paper, Bentley College of Business. Head, T. (2008). CAPM: Theory, advantages, disadvantages. ACCA Student accountant, 50-52. [Online] Available at: http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-students/2012/sa_jj08_head.pdf (Accessed 2 April 2014). Higson, C. and Elliot, J. (1998). Post-takeover returns: the UK evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 5(1), pp. 27–46. Jemison, D. B and Sitkin, S. B. (1986). Corporate Acquisitions: A Process Perspective. From Academy of Management Review, 11(1), pp.145-163. Jensen, M. and Ruback, R. (1983). The market for corporate control. Journal of financial economics, 11(1), pp. 5-55. Kaplan, S. N. and Weisbach, M. S. (1992). The success of acquisition: Evidence from Divestitures. The journal of finance, 47(1), pp.107-138. Limmack, R.J. (1991). Corporate mergers and wealth effects: 1977–86. Accounting and Business Research, 21(83), pp.239–251. Loughran, T. and Vijh, A.M. (1997). Do long term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions? Journal of Finance, 52(5), pp.1759–1790. Martynova, M. and Renneboog, L.(2009). What determines the financing decision in corporate takeovers: Cost of capital, agency problems, or the means of payment? Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, pp. 290-315. Meeks, G. (1977) Disappointing Marriages: A Study of the Gains from Merger. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Moeller, S. B.; Schlingemann, F. P. and Stulz, R. M. (2004). Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of financial economics, 73(2), pp. 201-228. Pearch ll, J. A.and Robinson Jr, R.B. (2004). Hostile takeover defenses that maximize shareholder wealth. Business Horizon, 47(5), pp. 15-24. Petmezas, D. (2009). What drives acquisitions? Market valuations and bidder performance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 19, pp. 54-74. Porter, M.E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate stragety. Howard business review, 65, (30), pp. 43-49. Rau, P.R. and Vermealen, T. (1998). Glamour, value and the post-acquisition performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(2), pp.223–253. Ravenscraft, D.J. and Scherer, F.M.(1989). The profitability of mergers. International journal of industrial organization, 7, pp.101-116. Salter, M. S. and Weinhold, W. A. (1979) Diversification Through Administration: Strategies for Creating Economic Value. New York: Free Press. Song, M.H. and Walking, R.A. (2004). Anticipation acquisitions and the bidder return puzzle. Working Paper, Ohio State University. Sudarsanam, S. and Mahate, A.A. (2003). Glamour acquirers, method of payment and post-acquisition performance: the UK evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 30(1-2), pp.299–341. Travlos, N. G. (1987). Corporate takeover bids, method of payment, and bidding firm’s stock return. Journal of finance, 42(4), pp. 943-963. Weir, C. and Laing, D. (2001). Governance structures, directors independence and corporate performance in the UK. European Business Review, 13(2), pp. 86-94.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Asquith, P. 1983. Merger bids, uncertainty, and stockholder returns. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 51-83. by saying, I think we are justified in doubting .. . the argument that mergers are done to maximize stockholder wealth." Foster (1983) seems to share this view or at least the view that bidders make big mistakes. Larcker (1983) presents interesting results that managers in large takeovers are more likely to have short-term, accounting-based compensation contracts. He finds that, the more accounting-based the compensation, the more negative is the market price reaction to a bid. Larcker also suggests that managers who own less stock in their own company are more likely to make bids.…

    • 8676 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Chang, S. Suk, D. Failed takeovers, methods of payment, and bidder returns, Financial Review. 33 (2), May 1998.…

    • 2889 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DO SHAREHOLDERS OF ACQUIRING FIRMS GAIN FROM ACQUISITIONS? Sara B. Moeller Frederik P. Schlingemann René M. Stulz Working Paper 9523 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9523 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2003…

    • 13122 Words
    • 53 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cakici, N., C. Hessel, and K. Tandon, 1996, Foreign acquisition in the United States: Effect on shareholder wealth of foreign acquiring firms, Journal of Banking and Finance 20, 307-329.…

    • 19168 Words
    • 77 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to understand the effect the 1980’s movement had on corporate management it is essential to trace those factors that played a key role in originating these changes as well as those activities that contributed to them. Firstly, with regards to the relation between corporate managers and shareholders before the 1980’s, it could be assessed that managers paid little importance to shareholder interests and were more loyal to the corporation itself. In most cases, compensation systems for management were not related to market performance. The need for better corporate performance gave birth to takeovers, junk bonds and leveraged buyouts. Takeovers were distinguished not only by hostility but also by the use of debt as the main source of capital. This mechanism consisted in the acquisition of firms by obtaining loans rather than by using their own resources (cash or equity issue). Managers reacted negatively towards them giving birth to hostilities. Evidently, management was reluctant to these new changes probably because they did not understand the real issue…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corporate Governance

    • 14611 Words
    • 59 Pages

    Grossman, S., Hart, O., 1980. Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell Journal of Economics 11, 42±64. Harris, M., Raviv, A., 1988. Corporate governance: Voting rights and majority rules. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 203±235. Hart, O., Moore, J., 1989. Default and renegotiation: A dynamic model of debt. Working paper. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Haugen, R., Senbet, L., 1978. The insigni®cance of bankruptcy costs to the theory of optimal capital structure. Journal of Finance 33, 383±393. Haugen, R., Senbet, L., 1988. Bankruptcy and agency costs: Their signi®cance to the theory of optimal capital structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23, 27±38. Hermalin, B., Weisbach, M., 1997. Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, forthcoming. Hermalin, B., Weisbach, M., 1988. The determinants of board composition. RAND Journal of Economics 19, 589±606. Hermalin, B., Weisbach, M., 1991. The e€ects of board composition and direct incentives on ®rm performance. Financial Management 101±112. Hirshleifer, D., Thakor, A., 1994. Managerial performance, boards of directors and takeover bidding. Journal of Corporate Finance 1, 63±90. Holderness, C., Sheehan, D., 1988. The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 317±346. Jensen, M., 1989. Active investors, LBOs and the privatization of bankruptcy. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 2, 35±44. Jensen, M., 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48, 831±880. Jensen, M., Meckling, W., 1976. Theory of the ®rm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.…

    • 14611 Words
    • 59 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Pettway, R. and T. Yamada (1986), Mergers in Japan and their Impacts upon Stockholders’ Wealth, Financial Management (Winter), pp. 43-52.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Takeover of companies is a well-accepted and established strategy for corporate growth. International experience of takeovers and mergers and amalgamations has been varied. Nonetheless, one of its important lessons is that, its appeal as an instrument of corporate growth has usually been the result of an admixture of corporate ethos of a country, shareholding pattern of companies, existence of cross holdings in companies, cultural conditions and the regulatory environment.…

    • 4950 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Merger Acquisition

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unlike previous merger waves, more companies have been successful with their acquisitions than not, although it is not clear whether this trend will continue. As shown in Figure 1.2, our analysis, in consultation with Towers Perrin, of shareholder performance in deals during the 1980s and 1990s was negative when compared to the market, whereas the performance of deals in the recent merger wave is thus far better than the market.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reed, S. F., Lajoux, A. R., & Nesvold, H. P. (2007). The Art of M&A, Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill. Retrieved August 29, 2012, from http://www.google.co.uk/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=0ZjBcS9lyrYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=merger+acquisition&ots=JFuqxXmM78&sig=gQv_3sDTwvdjJturM0dcZFd6-0o&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=merger acquisition&f=false…

    • 2318 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lewellen, W., Loderer, C., Rosenfeld, A., 1985. Merger decisions and executive stock ownership in acquiring firms. Journal of…

    • 12315 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Policy Determinants

    • 6922 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Jensen, M.C., 1986b, "The Takeover Controversy: Analysis and Evidence," Midland Corporate Finance Journal (Summer), 6-32.…

    • 6922 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stimulus to trail a merger or acquisition can be substantial; a company that unites itself with another can realize enhanced economies of scale, better sales revenue and market share in its market, expanded diversification and augmented tax effectiveness. Nevertheless, the underlying business justification and funding tactics for mergers and takeovers are considerably diverse.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cosh, A., Hughes, A., Lee, K., & Singh, A. (1998). “Takeovers, institutional investment and the…

    • 4285 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    marcia milon cornett, h. t. (1992). changes in corporate performance associated with bank acquisition. journal of finanacial economics , 211-234.…

    • 5754 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays