Preview

MODR 1760

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8087 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
MODR 1760
Lecture 1:
Obstacles to critical thinking:
-

-

Egocentrism – Inability to see things at others’ points of view. I want you to support me and tell me that I’m right. I don’t want your rational analysis. Just support me no matter what. Adults are more egocentric
Ethnocentrism – Or sociocentrism. My society, my ethnic background, etc.
Stereotyping – Although there is a cognitive compensity to do this.
Fear / Psychological Defensiveness – fear of questioning the beliefs
Dogmatism – This is faith. I can’t prove it but I accept it.
Bigotry –
Propaganda – usually distorted information
Resistance to change –
Unquestioned Loyalties –
Blind obedience to authority –
Mindless conformity –
Willed Ignorance –
Demagoguery – Take facts and spin them to your advantage not in a way that accurately reflects the truth. Or to spin them reversely to oppose your opponent. To raise emotions, prejudice, and ignorance in poorer and less-educated.

Lecture 3:
In order to have an argument we need two related claims. One claim supports the other. The supporter claim is premise. The supported is the conclusion. The process is inference. A claim is a statement that can be true or false.
-

Questions are not claims. Unless they’re rhetorical questions.
An opinion is a claim
Ought Imperative – something you ought to do. Making a claim about what you should or should not do. o You should not smoke!

Practice:
1- Keep off the grass = a command o Commands are things that we ought to do
2- Abraham Lincoln was the first president of the United States. = claim
3- If Sally calls, tell her I’m at the library. = request
4- Can’t you see that pornography demeans women? = a rhetorical question and a claim
5- Toby, never throw a pen at your sister! You could put an eye out! (said byToby’s mother)= ought imperative. (you ought not throw a pen because you could put an eye out!)
6- Never raise your hands to your kids. It leaves your groin unprotected.(George

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As used in the documentaries, it is a form of propaganda that seeks to call the general public to a certain action and leaves them with a feeling of belonging (Stults, 2016, para. 7). Nevertheless, the use of logical fallacies is an important technique to utilize in the practice of persuasion. When used effectively and with discretion, such as in FrackNation, logical fallacies have the ability to sway the viewer to stand for or against a controversial topic such as fracking. When used exorbitantly and aggressively, such as in Gasland, it has the ability to deter an audience from siding with the documentary. The utilization of logical fallacies takes the success of persuasion in FrackNation to the next level.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Violent Rhetoric and Arizona Politics” by Nathan Thornburgh, the author tries to get the message across that rumors can lead to more violence, than what actually happens. In a time where there are rumors flying, and people getting killed and a congresswoman shot because of them, Thornburgh is out there to prove his point that perhaps rumors are leading to all of this violence in Arizona. However his argument would have been more effective had he shown less bias, been a bit less dismissive and had provided more evidence and statistics to back up his paper. While not all bias is bad, too much can lead to an argument being less effective.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many political campaign ads are full of logical fallacies and metaphors which contribute to a candidate’s downfall or success. In fact, they are known for it. It is often rather easy to manipulate people to vote a certain way by using deceptive persuasion or making metaphorical comparisons. When trying to persuade someone else to adopt a position, these rhetorical tools contribute to the overall purpose of each campaign. The video campaign, “Obamacare: More Than a Glitch,” is a perfect example of this.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Doublespeak is the ability to use vague truths and positive deflecting language to redirect a person’s opinion or view on a potentially caustic issue. While not an actual act of lying, doublespeak is structured in such a way that it subconsciously nudges us to accept a more positive form of reality as truth, even if a clearly adverse topic is being presented or confirmed. The structure of doublespeak is enthusiastically circular; it never allows direct confirmation of an undesirable condition or event, yet proposes a more palatable outlook on the topic in question. Careful verbiage is used to discourage the ingesting of a topic in an undesirable interpretation, and to afford the audience more promising descriptions and thought processes to consume instead. Professor Lutz maintains that the doublespeak words actually manifest themselves as the perceived reality, thus softening the blow of a negative situation with optimistic language and careful inflection. A string of positive words is a lot easier to objectify and accept as truth than the actual act of a catastrophe or other harmful action. / For one to refer to their self as democratic, he or she has to believe in the fundamental ideology behind democracy. Government transparency and absolute power…

    • 724 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eng Comp. II

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Arguments that support the position. Arguments: why do you think this or that is true or false.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unintended consequences created when a difference exists between reality and the strategic narratives are difficult to manage and work through. This is particularly true when the public or the intended receiver of the narrative has been programed to believe a specific portion of the narrative. For instance, there are those who believe that banning Muslims from entering the United States is cruel and unconstitutional. On the other hand, there are those that understand the importance of ensuring background checks are complete and that every person that enters the United States, including Muslims) is properly vetted. Those who are on the extreme left of this argument, and thus the narrative, look to fulfill that part of the message that they identify with…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    order to have an argument one must be attempting to prove or justify one statement (the…

    • 5131 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argue Analysis Worksheet

    • 3144 Words
    • 13 Pages

    • An argument is valid if its premises necessarily lead to its conclusion. That is, if you accept that the premises are all true, you must accept that the conclusion is true.…

    • 3144 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. The body of the argument, consisting of the reasons to support the claim and including evidence that supports these reasons.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moreover, a claim is a statement that you want the other to accept. According to Mullins (2001:361) in Jaffee, a disputable assertion which needs supports or evidence so that it can be accepted and it is referred to one of syllogism premise, the major premise is called claim. The characteristics of claims are controversial, clear, balance, and challenge (Warnick and Inc). It needs to be arguable, not ambigious, confronting with value, belief, or communicant attitude. Fisher, Copy, and Cohen use conclusion indicators to identify claim, for example “so”, “therefore”, “then”, and “consequently”.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    for example, every time they were asked a question both candidates would commit a Red Herring or sidetracking the issue, leading the argument down side road. This method was found effective to Trump and Clinton because it would help them go around the question which was usually an issue but to cover it up with something relatable or beneficial to them. Next, Trump does this was the most other than the red herring fallacy, which is the Slippery Slope fallacy or Ignoring your opponents complex argument in order to set up and defeat an exaggerated or weaker argument. Trump was asked about the whole incident that he had with women, he had very little to say and argue his point so he would ignore the the situation completely while he sets up a stronger statement that has to do with making America safe by building a wall and controlling the Middle East, which can also be another red herring…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During any political debate, politicians will implement certain strategies that allow them to more effectively argue specific points that they are attempting to convince the general public of. In the 2012 Presidential Debate, President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney make several major claims about topics that are both controversial, yet necessary to discuss such as major economic plans and issues regarding Medicare. Throughout the debate, both Romney and Obama use eloquent and persuasive language in an attempt to appeal to the ethos, logos, and pathos of the audience, with the ultimate goal of increasing the number of votes received in the upcoming election. However, when thoroughly analyzed, the speeches of these great leaders seem to be laced with logical fallacies, making their debate, at least to an informed and logical audience, somewhat comical.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rhetoric in the Media

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many times we hear things through media and don't actually listen to what they may say. When people hear something through mass media, they don't realize that there is a person's point of view stated in the story. And many times what people don't see is that there is no such thing as an objective point of view. This is called Rhetoric; when someone states their point of view using words that either sway an audiences opinions one way or another. Rhetoric can be found in many places such as a T.V add or a commercial, magazine articles and advertisements, the news, and even radio commercials.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adolescent egocentrism is teens and older twin’s belief that others are highly attentive to their behavior and appearance. That is, egocentric adolescent believe that eyes are on them. Adolescent egocentrism is developmentally normal. In other words, teens and older twins can no more by stopping themselves from being egocentric than an infant can fix their inability to speak. Adolescent egocentrism usually appears around 11 or 12 years of age.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political language has two major issues; vague and confusing language, and telling lies with the confidence that they are true. Vague and confusing…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays