Preview

Modern Day Vegetarianism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2007 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Modern Day Vegetarianism
Vegetarianism is the theory or practice of living solely on vegetables, fruits, grains and nuts. It is practiced for moral, ascetic or nutritional reasons
In Western society today meat in many different forms is readily and economically available, yet the current trend shows a growing number of voluntary vegetarians around the world. In the United States, roughly 3 to 4 percent of the total populations are considered vegetarian. The origins of modern day Vegetarian philosophy and its influences can be traced back nearly three thousand years. . Most vegetarians are people who have understood that to contribute towards a more peaceful society we must first solve the problem of violence in our own hearts. So it's not surprising that thousands
…show more content…
The fundamental is known as the Dharmic law of reason. Ahimsa, the law of noninjury, is the Hindu's first duty in fulfilling religious obligations to God and God's creation as defined by Upanishadic scripture. The Spiritual Reason is that food is the source of the body's chemistry, and what we ingest affects our consciousnesses, emotions and experiential patterns. If one wants to live in higher consciousness, in peace and happiness and love for all creatures, then he cannot eat meat, fish, shellfish, fowl or eggs. By ingesting the grosser chemistries of animal foods, one introduces into the body and mind anger, jealousy, anxiety, suspicion and a terrible fear of death, all of which are locked into the flesh of the butchered creatures. For these reasons, vegetarians live in higher consciousness and meat-eaters abide in lower …show more content…
It is considered essential for self-purification, as well as the development of an ethical, merciful and compassionate self. In the modern philosophical era, Leo Tolstoy an influential Russian writer and philosopher was an advocate of vegetarianism.
" By killing man suppresses in himself, unnecessarily, the highest spiritual capacity-that of sympathy and pity towards living creatures like himself, and by violating his own feeling becomes so cruel." (Letter to Mrs. C.P. Farrell)
"A man can live and be healthy without killing animals for food; therefore, if he eats meat, he participates in taking animal life merely for the sake of his appetite. And to act so is immoral." - On Civil Disobedience
Tolstoy has mentioned a new linguistic twist on to an ancient Eastern philosophy. Cruelty has been introduced. Many contemporary vegetarians today, will not eat meat because of its inherent cruelty and immorality. This is not as controversial as abortion or mercy killing yet, but it has become a moral issue on randomly selected

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Mixed Messenger Summary

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    can take the practice of vegetarianism too far. Orenstein gives readers a clear example of this…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the course of mankind, “meat has been closely associated with power and privilege—a staple for the gentry and a rare treat for the peasants” (Ruby, Heine 448). Linking back to Campbell’s 1940 beef soup advertisement, beef is illustrated as a “For MEN Only” diet. There is a possibility that the ad’s secret message conveys’ females as being vegans’ since “people’s perceptions of vegetarians found that women were more accepting of vegetarians than men (Walker, 1995)…” (447). Furthermore, “[women’s] attitudes toward vegetarians were predominantly positive, especially among those [that scored] low in authoritarianism (Chin, Fisak, & Sims, 2002), and that omnivores tend to rate vegetarians as good, but weak people (Monin & Minson, 2007).” (447). In other words, women and vegetarians are seen as inferior compared to those who eat meat – though this is seen a generalization/perception in society. On the other hand, vegetarians are also perceived as people that have “a stronger sense of virtue and morality in those who abstain from eating meat” (450), since they abide by “four principal reasons: concern for animal welfare, concern for the environment, concern for health, and disgust at the sensory qualities of meat (e.g. Fox & Ward, 2008; Santos & Booth, 1996; Worsley & Skrzypiec, 1998).” (447). For males,…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The consumption of meat is a better or dietary option then vegetarianism. Not only does it have added health benefits that vegetarians don’t receive. It is also a easier harvest to produce. Author Barbara Kingsolver writes about the importance of livestock harvests and how the resources for animal harvests are much smaller than the resources for vegetable harvests. In her essay you can’t run away on harvest day she also talks about the geographical locations that can’t grow vegetables and the native people who can only survive on the harvest of livestock. David Biello talks about the resources that go into agriculture and the negative affects like deforestation or wasted produce in his essay will organic food fail to feed the world.’…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Vegetarian Myth, written by author Lierre Keith, tackles the ever-heated question: To eat animal products or not to eat animal products? I add the word “products,” after animal because the book should more properly be called the vegan myth. As a former vegan of over twenty years Keith comes from a place of experience, or as she might have it, a bitter experience. Feeling betrayed, in denial, and physically ill from her vegan years, she has made it her goal to reveal the truth and put to rest the Vegetarian notion that abstaining from animal products is the righteous path that is morally correct, will feed the hungry, and lead to greater nutrition. Chapter one, titled “Why This Book” will be the focus of this analysis because it gives an appropriate introduction to Keith’s…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Against Meat” by Jonathan Safran Foer from the New York Time Magazine. Jonathan Foer main claim is that vegetarianism is the way to. He also talks about how our perspective of vegetarianism is different from how he see them. Foer argues about factory farming, global warming and how eating meat is not necessary.He establishes common ground with the audience by telling his personal experience with the audience.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Some people become vegetarians after realizing the devastation that the meat industry is having on the environment.” (Vegetarian Times)…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United Nations reports “livestock production is now one of three most significant contributors to environmental problems, leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions, land degradation, water pollution, and increased health problems” (qtd. In Ilea). Varner could have argued that because these detrimental environmental impacts are occurring as a result of the current rates of meat consumption among humans, mass vegetarianism would actually be environmentally beneficial. It may even be additionally argued then that sentiests as well as environmentalists could potentially agree on or share this concept of vegetarianism, from anenvironmentally beneficial standpoint. Instead, Varner largely focuses on Callicott’s first three claims, but particularly focuses on Callicott’s view of…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meatless Like Me Analysis

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I’m surprised to see some people moving to the status “vegetarian” and this worries me for some rationality. These vegetarians who were once traditional eaters have transformed their diet to green-eaters. For example, they have become sympathizes towards animals. Especially towards “cows”. In fact, Taylor Clark, the author of “Meatless Like Me” one day, “realized that he could never look a cow in the eyes” and he felt as if he was doing something “cruel and unnecessary” (345). On the other hand, there are many omnivores who simply care about sustaining a balanced diet such as myself. It is important to feed humans and then not kill a cow to obtain food to the dying human child is,…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming a vegetarian is one of the best things a person can do for their body and soul. There are numerous reasons why people choose to illuminate or significantly decrease meat intake from their diet. Some vegetarians change their lifestyle to improve their health and prevent future diseases from forming. Eating a vegetarian or plant based diet not only will improve a person’s health, but will also help aid in the reduction of animals that are mistreated in factory farms, and will also contribute towards preserving the environment.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essay is presented on how different novelists represented eating animals in their own short essays. One story is a depiction on the ethics of importing animals for slaughtering by presenting the functional story of Professor David Lurie. Professor Lurie forced himself to eat sheep meat just to accept another person’s cultural belief. The common way of drawing a conceptual line between human and animal is represented repeatedly.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Omnivore Diet Benefits

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Industrial farmers appear to be more concerned with massive profit margins, than they do with producing quality food in providing meat and vegetables: “The cruelty of the factory farms—the cages are small, the slaughter is violent” (Foer 67). Spiritually, I cannot tolerate the brutal methods of animal treatment, which industrial ranchers and meat producers tend to follow in the 21st century. Therefore, it is important to follow an ethical version of the Standard American Diet, which provide the healthiest and most ethical production of food for human health. I believe that all living things should be treated with respect and reverence for what they provide, which sustains my own life through the sacrifice of their own. These are important aspects of the omnivore diet, which can be sustainable in the modern world. I follow a code of ethics in terms of how animals should be processed for consumption. The problem with eating meat is not necessarily eating the meat itself; it is respecting that another life form has given me life. This is why I support organically produced foods that will be processed through ethical farming methods within the general framework of the Standard American…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It has been argued that meat has high sources of energy, minerals, and proteins in the human diet. It is rich in proteins which have shown to have a high energy unit as compared to other food types. Proponents of meat consumption support its consumption as it has a greater nutritional value and is good to the test buds. Apart from the nutritional reasons, it is also thought meat consumption maintains the ecosystem at equilibrium. If meat consumption was to stop, it is thought that animals like cattle, sheep, goats and poultry will multiply to levels that are ecological disastrous. As most of these animals are herbivorous, their uncontrolled increase would exert extreme pressure on vegetation. This may cause wanton destruction to vegetation that may destabilize the ecosystem. In as much as these arguments appear logical and plausible, they still do not give any moral permissibility of eating meat. Just like any reason in support of unacceptable practice, proponents of eating meat do not give any solid ethical justification why humans should continue killing animals to please their test buds. There is no moral justification whatsoever to rationalize the eating of meat.…

    • 2590 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meat vs. Vegan

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sunaura and Andrew Taylor’s “Is It Possible to Be a Conscientious Meat Eater?” is an informative essay about the dirty side of the meat industry. They speak out of the physical abuse and poor living conditions endured by animals raised solely for the purpose of consumption. Because of the inhumane treatment towards animals, Taylor talks about a vegan solution and the many benefits associated with it. Animal cruelty is a sensitive topic that readers can easily be persuaded to either side. But, for the purpose of this essay, the reader can be swayed towards being a conscientious consumer. As mentioned already, animal rights and veganism will be discussed.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One major controversy in our country as well as other countries is what the preferable lifestyle diet is. Many dietary experts claims that one of the best lifestyle diets is the vegetarian diet. A vegetarian diet is defined as a person who does not eat or does not believe in the eating of animals, or in some cases, anything deriving from an animal. Usually with a person who is on a vegetarian diet, he or she will eat only foods from plants like vegetables and fruits. Research states that the reasons why vegetarianism is a superior life style choice is due to the fact that being a vegetarian allows a person to be healthy, stops pollution, saves animals, as well as saves money.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Talk lives in a man’s head, but sometimes it is very lonely because in the heads of many men there is nothing to keep it company - and so talk goes out through the lips.”…

    • 1275 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays