Preview

Mode of Production

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2749 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mode of Production
In the writings of Karl Marx and the Marxist theory of historical materialism, a mode of production (in German: Produktionsweise, meaning 'the way of producing ') is a specific combination of: * productive forces: these include human labour power and available knowledge given the level of technology in the means of production (e.g. tools, equipment, buildings and technologies, materials, and improved land). * social and technical relations of production: these include the property, power and control relations governing society 's productive assets, often codified in law, cooperative work relations and forms of association, relations between people and the objects of their work, and the relations between social classes. Marx regarded productive ability and participation in social relations as two essential characteristics of human beings and that the particular modality of these relations in capitalist production are inherently in conflict with the increasing development of human productive capacities.
Significance of concept
According to Marx, the combination of forces and relations of production means that the way people relate to the physical world and the way people relate to each other socially are bound up together in specific and necessary ways. People must consume to survive, but to consume they must produce, and in producing they necessarily enter into relations which exist independently of their will.
For Marx, the whole 'secret ' of why/how a social order exists and the causes of social change must be discovered in the specific mode of production that a society has. He further argued that the mode of production substantively shaped the nature of the mode of distribution, the mode of circulation and the mode of consumption, all of which together constitute the economic sphere. To understand the way wealth was distributed and consumed, it was necessary to understand the conditions under which it was produced.
A mode of production is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    * Marx: “Social class is fundamentally determined by one’s relationship to the means of production.”…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx believed that economic processes, such as the harnessing of natural resources, producing goods, developing new technologies and establishing a division of labor in the workforce, are of great importance in society. According to Marx, these economic processes are crucial because in order for these any of these things to happen, people in society come together and enter into social class relationships.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crisis and Capitalism

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marx believed he had provided a comprehensive account of the inner dynamics of capitalist social organization. According to those who understand him to have offered a complete crisis theory, Marx demonstrated that the particular form social investment takes under capitalism, c:v (constant capital : variable capital), works initially to accelerate, but latterly to strangle the long-wave development of mankind's means of production proportional to our labour power, M:L. Given that the advancement of M:L is the foundation of all material progress and thus social progress for Marx, proving that capitalism retards M:L is all the proof Marx needed that capitalism was becoming obsolete. The alternative to replacing capitalism would be for its ever-present crisis to drag humanity back to barbarism, destroying the gains that capitalism itself had created.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He uses information that has obviously been aware to many. When Marx disagrees with the private ownership of property, such technique is fairly visible. He believes that “Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour.” For the Bourgeois society, “the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.” However, Marx claims that in this Bourgeois society, the workers do not work the sake of themselves but for the sake of the bourgeois and that “All that we want to do away with is the miserable character of this appropriation, under which the labourer lives merely to increase capital, and is allowed to live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it.” According to Marx, it is logic that a labour should work for the purpose of working. Thus, he believes that labours working for the Bourgeois lost their sole purpose of existence-work. He claims that in the Bourgeois society, the Proletarians are used to increase capital and the Bourgeois property only, and become useless after they have done their job. In the Communist society, “accumulated labour is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the labourer.” Through the use of reasoning concepts that were obvious to the readers even before it was ever reasoned in this document, Marx persuades the audience that the function of the Bourgeoisie society is…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx's Ideal Society

    • 2566 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Marx's theory stems from the social conditions existing during his lifetime. This was when the industrial revolution was hitting its stride. Great technological advances were being made to the modes of production, especially…

    • 2566 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx believes that division of labor is a natural process, one that arises near spontaneously. Marx believes that as a nation develops its labor inevitably also becomes more divided. “How far the productive forces of a nation are developed is shown most manifestly by the degree to which division of labor has been carried. Each new productive force…causes a further development of the division of labor” (Tucker, 150). This division is what he finds to be problematic because it separates man from doing what he truly desires to do. In a highly specialized society, every individual must contribute to a facet of the society’s collective production; however, this input may be very minimal (depending on the degree of specialization). To whit, “As soon as the distribution of labor comes into being, each man has a particular, exclusive sphere of activity” (160). Every man has his place and he is forced into it by the demands of society. However,…

    • 2363 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    I am beginning with the famous quote from The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels to frame a question to myself about Marx’s theoretical importance and its practical implication. I had my first encounter with Marx when I was in the 11th standard of my formal education. Since then the ghost of Marx has been impelling me to follow him (in one way or the other). I try to look at him, listen to him and learn from him but his immaterial body tells me less about the material aspects. I see through him but I cannot concretize him. May be that’s why I have always understood…

    • 2166 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx expressively stated historical differences in productive systems for the emergence of the modern world, but also pointed out the persistence of social conflict in the human history. Weber tells us that modern societies are guided by rationality instead of tradition which guided the pre-industrial societies. Durkenheim says that in the modern industrial societies, mechanical solidarity, based on moral consensus, is overtaken by organic solidarity, which is based on productive…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenski Social Inequality

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He held the radical antithesis view on social inequality. This view holds that equality is the natural order of society and inequality is a problem that must be fixed. Marx believed that society’s struggle was primarily due to class conflict. He said that the basis of modern society revolved around its mode of production which consisted of two parts; means of production (technology) and social relations of products (parts that people play in relation to products) (Sernau 15). The means…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx: Conflict Theory The most influential socialist thinker from the 19th century is Karl Marx. Karl Marx can be considered a great philosopher, social scientist, historian or revolutionary. Marx proposed what is known as the conflict theory. The conflict theory looks at how certain social interactions occur through conflict. People engage in conflict everyday to gain more power then others in society. Karl Marx is known for studying the conflicts that occur between different classes. Karl Marx has introduced some radical ideas and theories to society through his writings. As the industrial revolution moved forward in society, so did the widening gap between class structures. Karl Marx studied the differences arising between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat people. The bourgeoisie are interested mainly in developing a capitalist society, using advanced methods of production. The bourgeoisie are the capitalist who own the factories, the products made in the factories, and controlled all the trade. The Proletariats or working class people have gained nothing in society but the thrill of their own labor. The Proletariats feel that they are treated poorly by the middle class society. They receive only enough in life to survive and have no chance of achieving a higher, class status. The bourgeoisie or middle class people in society were exploiting and degrading the Proletariat people. The Proletariats helped to improve production in society, which developed capitalism and helped it to grow faster. The Proletariats where not getting the wages they deserved for the labor that was accomplished. Capital gain was being made for the labor the working class provided, but there was still no way of improving status in society. The middle class was taking over and the rich were staying rich and the poor continued to be poor. Marx wanted the working class to stand up to the bourgeoisie and cause a class conflict. The idea was that if the working class revolted against the…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As an economic determinist he believed economic structure is the powerful force driving human existence and behavior. Consciousness is ascertained via our social relationships and interaction which is based on how we labor and produce material goods. Therefore Marx believed the type of society we have is based on how the means of production within society is established Example Slavery or Capitalism.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx explores on capitalism and its effects on society. Capitalism is referred to as an economic and political system where the country’s market industry is ‘capitalized’ and owned by private individuals. These individuals are known as the bourgeoise. The bourgeoisie are the people who own the means of production. Moreover, beneath these individuals are the means to their product known as the proletariat. The proletariats are individuals known as the ‘working class’ and sell their labour to the bourgeoisie for wages. Evidently, the bourgeoisie-protelteriat relationship is an interdependent system that is the core of capitalism.(quote 3) The underlying forces of capitalism are class conflicts and exploitation. (quote 3).…

    • 1683 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pride And Prejudice Marx

    • 1453 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Karl Marx, society is comprised of two separate classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx’s overarching argument is that a class conflict arises due to the increasingly distinct separation between the two classes and their relationship to the means of production. The bourgeoisie is comprised of a small group of people who own the means of production while the proletariat consists of the vast majority of the population who actually produce goods and services. In addition, Marx claims the economic means of production form a base for the world, which creates social and political relations between classes that ultimately forms the “superstructure.”…

    • 1453 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx belief of human nature is that it changes over time; it is historical and dynamic. In understanding human nature, it is important to understand what part labour plays in human nature. "To be Human is to labour," (88) therefore Marx believes that Humans work in the world with other Humans in exchange with nature to get what they desire. Thus since human nature is dynamic so are humans' wants and desires. In order to achieve one's wants and desires one must labour with others around them and with nature itself. Since labour is the activity of a group, the ever-changing world created through the labour of those groups also creates the humans themselves and directly affects them. Through labour, humanity creates, and is responsible for the world that they live in. Marx suggests that Capitalism leads to the centralization and concentration of living spaces of where people live, their means of production, monopolies and the distribution of more power to the bourgeoisie. The success of Capitalism is directly connected to capital and wage labour. Capitalism's goal is to increase profits called accumulation; profits then reinvested else where to make more capital. Capitalism flourishes by extracting surplus value, or profit, from the commodities produced by the working class. Without capitals and profits there are obviously no wages and a place to do any…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays