Preview

Moby Dick Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1002 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moby Dick Rhetorical Analysis
In Chapter 73, “Stubb and Flask Kill a Right Whale” of Herman Melville’s “Moby Dick”, Captain Ahab decides that he wants to catch and kill a Right Whale. He believes that if you have a Right Whale head and a Sperm Whale head dragging of the back of the ship, then good luck will come. In this chapter, Ahab reveals more of his desperation to kill Moby Dick. Ahab feels like he has to kill Moby Dick in order to put his soul at peace. This is where philosopher Immanuel Kant plays in. Kant believes that knowledge is innate, but also is gained through experience. He also believes a person is good or bad based on their motivation and reasoning for action. Kant does not believe that actions make someone a good person, but their devotion to morality …show more content…
A categorical imperative is an unconditional command, where a hypothetical imperative is a self-command or a goal that is set, driven off of desire within oneself. This applies to both Ishmael and Ahab, but especially Ahab. Immanuel Kant would be understanding of Ahab’s motivation to kill Moby Dick, and would say that his vengeance has valid reason, but that doesn’t necessarily make him a good person. Ahab does not have much devotion to morality, his devotion is to Moby Dick. Although his motivation is valid, the steps which he took to get to Moby Dick were not completely moral. Although everyone on the ship would have benefited from Killing Moby Dick, financially or emotionally, you could argue that Ahab is selfish and is using his crew to help get what he wants, because he clearly wants Moby Dick more than anyone else. If Stubb was to call someone the devil, it should have been Moby Dick. The infamous whale is the one that is truly controlling Ahab’s conscience. He has driven Ahab to the point where he would put his entire crew’s life on the line simply to gain pleasure from killing him. Kant believes that suicide is selfish and immoral. Ahab was very aware of the danger Moby Dick poses to him, and he was willing to risk his life going after him, it was basically suicide. Kant would see Ahab as a bad person, with potential to become …show more content…
He believed that all ideas come from sensation and reflection. By sensation, he means through the five senses. An example of this would be when Moby Dick took Ahab’s leg from him, the pain he felt most definitely triggered something deep inside of him that caused him to be unconditionally motivated to seek revenge. That is where he got the idea to pursue the whale once again. An example of an idea from reflection was when maybe Ahab started to doubt the luck of the Pequod and of Finding Moby Dick, and then is when he ordered for the right whale to be killed. Any philosopher’s views are applicable somewhere in “Moby Dick” but Kant felt like the most applicable one of them all. Ahab’s internal struggle slowly becomes more apparent throughout the book, the amount of desperation rises. He feels obliged to kill

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Gauthier, D. (1969) The Logic of ‘Leviathan’: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    It starts bumping onto their shit and about 2 men had died because the power of the whale was the power of 10 elephants and it had many run ins with other ships. The struggle against Moby Dick lasts three days. On the first day, Ahab spies the whale himself, and the whaling boats row after it. Moby Dick attacks Ahab's boat, causing it to sink, but Ahab survives the ordeal when he reaches Stubb's boat. Despite this first failed attempt at defeating the whale, Ahab pursues him for a second day. On the second day of the chase, roughly the same defeat occurs. This time Moby Dick breaks Ahab's ivory leg, while Fedallah dies when he becomes entangled in the harpoon line and is drowned. After this second attack, Starbuck chastises Ahab, telling him that his pursuit is impious and blasphemous. Ahab declares that the chase against Moby Dick is immutably decreed, and pursues it for a third day. On the third day of the attack against Moby Dick, Starbuck panics for ceding to Ahab's demands, while Ahab tells Starbuck that "some ships sail from their ports and ever afterwards are missing," seemingly admitting the futility of his…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    entitled “The Quarter Deck,” serves as a major turning point in the story, where tension and…

    • 1489 Words
    • 1 Page
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3.06 Moby Dick

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. For Captain Ahab, he sees Moby Dick as all that is evil in the universe, and believes he needs to be killed. For Starbuck, he has gone to sea “simply to hunt whales” he only wishes to kill the whale for oil, not for revenge for his captain. To Ishmael, Moby Dick is…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ahab says this because his crew has agreed to follow him and he wants to thank them and he wants to try to help keep them safe for the…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Through his novel Moby Dick, it is obvious that during his life Herman Melville experienced conflicts in his religious beliefs, an understandable outcome stemming from the intellectual background of the nineteenth century. There existed during Melville’s time, a contradiction between the Calvinist theory of predestination, with its idea of inborn immorality and original sin, and Ralph Waldo Emerson’s concept of Transcendentalism, which emphasized the idea of inherent goodness and self-reliance. Critics have long debated Melville’s shared beliefs with Emerson and Transcendentalism and his faithfulness to the Calvinist religion. Moby Dick reflects the conflict between Calvinism and Transcendentalism as, through the characters and the biblical…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs. Mill

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    First, I will talk about the theories and views held by philosopher Immanuel Kant. Kant argues that only rational beings can count as moral agents and the perspective of moral concern extends only to rational beings. This perspective is the nucleus of Kant philosophy. A large aspect of the possession of reason, in Kant’s view, is the ability to gain knowledge that cannot be shown as false through experience and, just by thought, can be learned. A good example of this a priori knowledge is, “the sum of the angles of a square is 360 degrees.” Anyone who has studied geometry knows once it has been proved we can say that we beings can possess this type of knowledge, and having this knowledge can allow a being to make a judgment about their action. The ability to possess this knowledge to determine an action leads me to Kant’s next claim.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This phrase of Hobbes can be seen as a summary of all his views on man as a moral agent in building a peaceful society. In his definition of ‘deliberation’ as ‘the whole sum of desires, aversions, hopes and fears’, we can find two important features: (1) deliberation and reason are not equivalent, and (2) deliberation is not an exclusive faculty…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immanuel Kant and his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) attempts to uncover a universal moral principal for all to use. According to Kant, we aren’t only knower’s, we are also doers as we act and make certain decisions in the world. He wants to know what decisions we should make and how should we treat people in this diverse world. He contemplates the use of internal feelings of approval or disapproval to know when something is right or wrong, but deems there are many problems with this has feelings are always changing. Kant believes that goodwill and goodwill alone is good in itself without qualification.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is a categorical imperative? A categorical imperative is a moral obligation which is absolute and necessary in any moral situation and isn’t reliant on a singular person’s desires or wills. For Kant, categorical imperatives are the foundation for morality because they invoke “pure” reasons for our moral actions and decisions since each rational being reasons to act outside of their own personal desires or will which may cloud judgments or impose a biased verdict of the situation. Kant explains this by distinguishing two different kinds of imperatives; categorical and hypothetical. Obviously Kant is interested in categorical imperatives and uses this distinction to show the difference between them so that categorical imperatives come out stronger. As stated before, categorical imperatives according to Kant are moral obligations which are absolute and necessary in any moral situation and isn’t reliant on a particular person’s desires or purpose. He also says that categorical imperatives (obligations) are such if they are of a commanding or imposing nature. For example “Don’t murder!” is a categorical imperative which is binding to every rational person and forces a person to act of good will. Hypothetical imperatives on the other hand are obligations in which there is an end result of your action which is in turn a result of your personal desires our thoughts. An example of a hypothetical imperative is the statement “If you want to stay out of jail, then don’t murder”. Here, there is no sense of authority behind it; it doesn’t have any weight or value behind it.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant's Humanity Formula

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "Few formulas in philosophy have been so widely accepted and variously interpreted as Kant's injunction to treat humanity as an end in itself"(Hill, 38). Immanuel Kant's views, as elucidated in his book, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, are based on the belief that "people count" by prohibiting actions which exploit other individuals in order for self-prosperity or altruistic ends. Ethics then, are confirmed by the dignity and worth of the rational agency of each person. Since human beings are the only rational beings capable of decision making and reasonable judgement, humanity must be valued. Kant proposes a test that ensures that humanity is treated with respect, and not used merely as an instrument. To understand how he defines this test, we must first take a look at the foundation of his main principle, the Categorical Imperative.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality In Moby Dick

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the story, Moby Dick, Captain Ahab has set out to kill the enormous whale that has taken his leg. This is an example of how we set morals so we don’t become the kind of people we despise. Captain Ahab does not want to be presumed a coward, so he makes a mission of finding the whale that took something from him. Ahab assembles his crew and is on a journey to find the whale. This is an example of how we set morals so we don’t become the kind of person that society…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moby Dick Passage Analysis

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The story of the Essex’s begins in an innkeeper's house. This is where the great journey will start and then end it. In one night the story of Moby Dick will be told, from the great adventures, to its turmoils, to the never ending pain but in the end truth will rings out.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Symbolism In Moby Dick

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Through the symbol of the wind as a microcosm for the natural world and Ahab’s interaction with the wind, Herman Melville argues that human will will never been able to subvert the natural world long term, and short term attempts will be at the cost of the individual. Throughout Moby Dick, Melville characterizes Ahab as ambitious and charismatic, a leader who constantly internally and externally compares himself to a god. The wind acts as a symbol, an object that represents a greater intangible motif, for the natural world. Through Ahab’s monologue about his interactions with the wind, his own helplessness within the natural world becomes evident. Ahab begins by stating “Were [he] the wind, [he]’d blow no more on such a wicked, miserable world” (Melville, 337),…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The killing of another on behalf of a previous wrong—revenge—saturates the novel Moby Dick by Herman Melville. In this novel, Ahab, the obsessed captain of the Pequod, seeks to annihilate the white whale Moby Dick. In his unnatural fixation on the whale, Captain Ahab manipulates the other sailors on the ship into following after his own goal. His unceasing desire to kill however stems from his earlier encounter with the whale. The captain’s obsession constitutes the plot for the entire novel. Captain Ahab’s indefatigable enmity toward Moby Dick generates hysteria inside of him as well as others, instigating the plot of the novel.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays