Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

MN Roy - Radical Humanism

Satisfactory Essays
476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
MN Roy - Radical Humanism
M.N. Roy – Principles of Radical Humanism

M.N. Roy was a national revolutionary and a man devoted to the cause of Indian national freedom, though his approach was very different and his method of struggle quite untraditional. He was sufficiently under the influence of Communism and basically adhered to that philosophy though he differed from Marx in details. He developed his own philosophy which he called Radical Humanism and for which he wanted to have an independent nature and character. Basic principles of his philosophy were:-

Individual Freedom. According to M.N. Roy individual was an end in itself and every other organization in the society was simply means to an end. He pleaded that everything was below individual freedom which should not be subordinated to anything else. He was not ready to subordinate individual freedom even to religion or morality or to any other super-natural power.

His Ideas about nature of Man. According to M.N. Roy by nature man loves freedom. With regard to human nature he was rather close to Rousseau who said that man was born free and everywhere he was in chains. In his opinion man was governed by the same principle as physical sciences and in fact there was no basic difference between the two. He, however, distinguish between the two on the basis of rationalism.

His views about Democracy. According to M.N. Roy in its present form democracy did not grant either economic or social or political freedom. In fact, he came to the conclusion that the present impure democracy sacrified individual freedom for the sake of collective freedom. He also came to the conclusion that democracy required a fundamental changed both in nature and character.

His views about Materialism. M.N. Roy believed in the basic doctrine of historical materialism by Marx, but he differed from him in details. In his opinion there was no differences between organic and unorganic matter. He was of the opinion that all living bodies were formed out of certain chemical matters and their combination in resulted in in the creation of other matters. In his opinion mind was a characteristic of matter at a high stage of development. He thus tried to esblish a close relationship between an individual’s min and matter.

His views about history. According to M.N. Roy, human history was nothing else but a record of struggle for freedom. History was a witness that the people always fought either for their political, social or economic freedom and that at no stage did their struggle come to an end.

His views about obstacles on individual freedom. M.N. Roy very much loved individual freedom. He, however, felt that there were certain obstacles in the way of individual freedom. The greatest obstacle was the state which was trying to become an end in itself rather than retaining its essential character remaining means to an end.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    He believed so strongly in individual liberty and freedom because he believed that each individual should have the chance to maximize their potential (even though not all individuals are equally capable). He saw that with an increase of a working class in a society, there was also the possibility of increased conformity…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his long life he fought for human rights. He was one of the men that made India an independent country. Through a peace insurrection. Even in his tragic death he is one of the greatest men ever born.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us History Study Guide

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    individualism in social and economic affairs; belief not only in personal liberty and self-reliance but also in free competition…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "To be free, a man must be free from his brothers." Individuality is one of the major themes through the book Anthem. Once people have individuality they never want to let it go. That is he one reason why the city council banned anything to do with being an individual. The council knew that if individuals were allowed to make their own choices those choices would often conflict with the desired outcome of the council. The council wanted to have a perfect society. This is an impossibility since every human is born with the instinct to think and act for ones self. The only way to have a perfect society is if everyone is a robot with no thoughts, feelings, emotions or opinions.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ethics

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant’s definition of human autonomy is too formalised and hard to achieve -> ideal, unattainable, hard to achieve…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, to discuss the importance of individualism, it must be defined. Individualism is the social theory favouring freedom of action for individuals over collective or state control. Essentially the belief that the individual is more important than the social group. This is then split further into methodological individualism where the individual is placed at the centre of political theory and ethical individualism where moral priority is given to the interests of the individual.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the present political spectrum, democracy is essentially understood as both the most humane and effective means by which to govern a body politic. While democracy is currently relatively non-controversial, this was not the case during its establishment. The democratic experiment in America was viewed somewhat indifferently by many of the world's prominent political philosophers. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill existed among those most apprehensive of the democratic experiment. To each of these men, democracy certainly possessed certain positive attributes, but at the same time, represented a potential threat to the individual freedoms of man, through a much feared 'tyranny of the majority'.…

    • 982 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Kant mentions freedom, he means that one has to have freedom to be enlightened. He believes that in order to go from an immature child to a courageous man, one must have freedom and make his own decisions on how to balance both faith and scientific methods. It is until someone stops doing everything for you and guiding you in life, when man can thoroughly understand. He believes freedom is so central to the Enlightenment because there is a lack of Enlightenment among men, however, with freedom and courage, one will be able enlighten themselves; so long as the Church be demolished and the people are able to use their freedom and their intelligence to think for themselves.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Way back when in the late 17th and 18th century, there was this thing called, The Enlightenment, and people say it was explicitly important for why we live life the way we live it today. Now whether you believe that or not (I suggest believing it because it's true) it doesn't part from the the people who were a major key in this whole enlightenment thing. I will talk about four different philosophers in this essay that all spoke about individual freedom and natural rights. These thinkers were all majorly influenced by a man named Isaac Newton. They all wanted to be the “next newton”. So they invented, spoke, wrote books, wrote poems and letters all to share their ideas. So there is just one question, What are these philosophers main ideas?…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For my first PBL In American Government I was given several questions on natural and civil rights and also the types of acts that took place for the natural and civil rights became an importance to people of America. The first question I was given “The Governments and societies based on the natural rights philosophy guarantee certain rights to their citizens. How would you describe or define a right?” As stated in the Declaration of Independence, we were given the right as a citizen to have life, liberty, religion, property, equality, and education. This right was for every citizen in the United States.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secular Humanism

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Secular morality is the aspect of philosophy that deals with morality outside of religious traditions. Modern examples include humanism, freethinking, and most versions of consequentialism. Additional…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay “Self Reliance” and Henry David Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience”, both composure thinkers speak about being individual and what changes need to be made in society. Ralph Waldo Emerson and his follower, Henry David Thoreau, both individualists, attacked the religious, political, and cultural values of American society in order to make people aware that they are more important than everything, including government and society. According to Emerson, society is an obstruction against the individuality of its members, “Society is a joint-stock company, in which the members agree, for the better securing of his bread to each shareholder, to surrender the liberty and culture of the eater. The virtue in most requests is conformity”.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stuart Mill Conformity

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the essay Of Individuality, published by Mill in 1869, the theorist asserted that the modern age has the capacity to diminish the individual by shaming them into conformity. Contrarily, regarding human nature, Mill believed in the most good for the largest number of people, ensuring that both actions and opinions are limited. Yet, he insisted on an emphasis of individual liberty as long as it remained balanced with social stability. Therefore, Mill concluded, individuals are necessary to promote progress in society.5…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is human nature? Are humans self-interested and savage or are we socially conscious and kind? The people of the French Revolution give us an answer to these questions. The French Revolution was a time of rebellion and revolution and provided an immense change to the country of France. The revolt was started by drought, rising prices, and increasing frustration with the government by the citizens of France. The rebelliousness followed the previous age of Enlightenment. Enlightenment philosophers such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes searched and discovered new ideas about the nature of people and the role of government. Locke believed that every man was born with natural rights and will behave well as long as they have these. Hobbes on the contrary believed that we are all savage creatures who use violence to get our own way. Through events such as The Declaration of the Rights of Man and The Tennis Court Oath, John Locke’s understanding of human nature can be judged as more accurate than that of Thomas Hobbes.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.J. Rousseau was an optimistic Enlightenment thinker. He believed that people were born naturally good but that the cruel society corrupted him. His optimistic beliefs are showed in The Social Contract, in which he expressed his belief of general will. He argued that the individual replaced the monarch as the true source of power. Rousseau also argued that the general will was not that of the majority but it was the will of a far-seeing minority…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays