Preview

Mister

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
464 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mister
Analyze attitudes toward and evaluate the motivations behind the European acquisition of African colonies in the period 1880 to 1914.
During the late 1800’s, Europe had a steady decline rate of available work, so Europe, as a whole, was looking for a way to improve overall. Many European countries look towards Africa to create new colonies for Europeans to better their own country. European’s attitudes towards Africa was Europeans were a superior race in comparison to Africans. Motivation was acquired from the help of strong nationalism to then acquire new land to build upon their country to improve its economy and create new available work.
European nations all had different reasons to control parts of Africa. Chancellor Otto von Bismark said to his Countryman exploring in africa, “ Your map of Africa is very nice, but my map of Africa is in Europe. Here is Russia and here is France, and we are in the middle. That is my map of Africa.” (Doc 3). He argues that he is focusing on Europe and he is only willing to establish colonies because France and Russia are doing it as well. Eugene-Melchior de Vogue, French diplomat, describes how the European balance of power is now becoming a world balance of power (Doc 10) in the book, The Master of the Sea. Nations would have to develope more colonies in Africa in order to stay visible to other bigger and powerful nations.
Another way to show awareness and capability was to colonize Africa, Archibald Philip Primrose stated. (Doc 8). This statement makes it clear that Primrose was pro imperialism due to the political pluses that it provides. The belief of European nations have the right and is automatically entitled to go to Africa and occupy their land was stated by Martial Henri Merlin. (Doc 11). He believed that imperialism is the correct and the most important thing to participate in. This point of view is justifiable through the fact that is is indeed the Governor of Africa.
Europe was always competitive especially

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The three decades following the Berlin conference were chaotic as European powers competed to occupy and colonize Africa. Europe would be profiting off the resources that they collected from their reaction to far much weaker subordinate African colonies. As Europe’s wealth amassed, Africa’s wealth approached its end. It was soon Eu European intruders as a much stronger force than themselves and lost all their ties to older tradition through fear. In 1886, the British government commissioned and administered the development of the which was signed by many African rulers (doc.1). These Africans gave in but the document does not specify if they gave in because they lost sights of the nation they were once before. Another document of the reason…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period of 1880 to 1914, positive and negative attitudes ascended throughout the acquisition of African colonies. Some thought that it would reinforce Europe's economy and government, others supposed it would add pressures to Europe; it end up being a benefit to the economy, strengthen the nation and civilizing Africa. Motivations would be up brought upon the vague consideration about this dilemma.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A driving force behind European imperialism in Africa is political power. In document A, a map is shown, showing the number of African colonies dominated by European countries. This shows Europe’s lust desire for power in Africa’s government because, the amount of land back then, meant the amount of political power one had of the African government.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scramble Dbq Analysis

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1884, the European government colonized areas in Africa which was known as the European Scramble for Africa. There are various ways of actions and reactions of the Africans in response to the European Scramble for Africa. Some are Peaceful Cooperation, some are violent, some are based on increased religion, and some are total rejection. These reactions are shown in Documents one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, and nine. Each document has a person’s point of view and a date (1800’s-1907).…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The African leaders elucidated that they would never give in to European imperialism. Prempeh I, an Ashanti leader, clearly stated that he would never allow Britain to conquer the Ashanti kingdom (Doc. 2). Prempeh…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the years that followed the Berlin Conference (1884-1885) European nations divided and colonized Africa among themselves. This time period became to be known as the Scramble for Africa. It would be years until Africa freed itself of European domination. Yet in the time that the Scramble for Africa took place, European dominance was met with various reactions from the native people. Some natives unwillingly submitted, opposed to the idea of European domination, but left with no other choice. Other natives were willing to compromise, while the rest were preparing or already rebelling against the…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the driving forces behind European imperialism was the need for resources. The Europeans didn’t know anything about Africa and was unknown to them until the mid 1800s. When the Europeans discovered…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Africa in the mid to late 1800s was still uncharted territory according to European countries. They all wanted the resources Africa had to offer, and were willing to do whatever it took to get them. Eventually after thousands upon thousands of deaths, Africa would be divided up into different colonies. There were many different causes of death in Africa, from diseases to people killing each other. Many countries wanted in, more people wanted them out.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Much of Africa's history revolves around it’s interactions with Europeans. The Europeans exploited and conquered much of the African continent. They were able to conquer Africa through imperialism which is a process of invasion, attack and exploitation for natural resources. Africa had many natural resources that Europeans wanted to themselves and the only solution they came up with was to conquer Africa.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism Autosaved

    • 909 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the 1800’s, seven European nations were taking land from Africa for themselves without the consent of the Africans. This is known as Imperialism; imperialism is an action by a strong nation to take control of another country. In this case Europe was the strong nation, and it was taking control of Africa. Many asked themselves why the Europeans were engaging in Imperialism. The European nations were engaging in imperialism for political factors and cultural causes because they wanted to gain power and spread their culture. However, the primary cause for engaging in imperialism was economic. European nations competed against one another to exploit Africa’s natural resources for financial gain.…

    • 909 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism Dbq

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Economic motives created by the Industrial Revolution played the most important role in Imperialism in Africa in the 19th Century. One very important economic motivator was the need for resources for production. As Africa had been barely touched by Europeans, there were many opportunities for finding…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The last general motive behind European imperialism in Africa were cultural reasons. Industrialized countries felt as if it was their need to help less fortunate countries to lift them out of poverty and feed the “new-caught, sullen peoples, half-devil and half-child” (Document F). Document F also has a quote from Lobengula Khumalo, a chief leader in South Africa, stating how he felt as if England had crept up on his tribe’s territory and snatched it away, as a chameleon does to a fly, “England is the chameleon and I am the fly.”…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history, nations have tried to ‘compete’ with each other in almost every respect, trying to become the biggest world power. One way to do this is by developing colonies: this increases land supply as well as the abundance of resources, thus improving the economy. Africa was a generally underdeveloped continent with weak, decentralized political structures that could be easily conquered by western militaries, who wanted to colonize there to use the raw materials and human labor to improve their economy. While Belgians who were imperializing the Congo in the 19th century believed and justified their actions by saying they were helping the conquered peoples to advance and “catch up” to the West technologically and culturally, in reality…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French and European powers wanted more direct control of their colonies during the 18th and 19th centuries than they did in the 15th and 16th centuries. This new period of Imperialism, led to the Europeans demanding more power over the political, economic, and social lives of all people. The Europeans looked at the Africans as not being able to handle the complex ideals of running a country. They wanted to make the land of Africa to have an economy that benefitted the European economy. They wanted the people already there to begin to follow their customs and traditions.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Europe started to move closer inland of Africa, they started by making deals with the chiefs of native tribes. This started mostly with a journalists named H. M. Stanley. He explored Africa and made unfair treaties with leaders. He did this with support of the Belgian kind, King Leopold II. These treaties would often be something similar to, in exchange for a few yards of cloths and some trinkets, Belgium will be able to put their flag on the chiefs land and use the land as well as the people on it.5 Before Europe had come in and started to take over the land, the natives had known what resources they had and were very skilled in using them, and they lived largely off of trade with other regions and tribal communities. The had a livable system that was serving the community well. When Europeans took over, they saw many of the resources that were in Africa, such as diamonds and iron6 and knew the value of them on a bigger market and told the natives that there is much more worth in this land then they are getting out of it. The chiefs then let the Europeans trade the resources on a worldly scale, which, while it did give Africa a bigger, and more worldly economy, it quickly turned into a bourgeoisie/proletarian society with the African on…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays