Preview

Mission Command Paper: General McClellan and the Battle of Antietam

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4616 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mission Command Paper: General McClellan and the Battle of Antietam
AMEDD CAPTAINS CAREER COURSE

GENERAL MCCLELLAN AND THE BATTLE OF ANTIETAM

SUBMITTED TO MR. KEN FRANK
SMALL GROUP 7
MISSION COMMAND PAPER

BY
CPT CHRIS KOLBOSKY

AMEDD CENTER AND SCHOOL, FT. SAM HOUSTON, TX
03 FEBRUARY 2014

INTRODUCTION
Building a movement always challenges the status quo. Leaders must act, they must willingly risk the things they love and unfortunately, many leaders are frozen by the lethargy of indecision i. Union General George B. McClellan, who was meticulous in his planning and preparations, was also known for not aggressively challenging his opponents on a fast-moving battlefield environment. He chronically overestimated the strength of the enemy and was reluctant to apply principles of mass, frequently leaving large portions of his army unengaged at decisive points ii. At no time was this more evident during the only battle of the Civil War in which McClellan led his troops from start to finish. His performance during the bloody Battle of Antietam blunted General Robert E. Lee’s invasion of Maryland, but also allowed him to eke out a precarious tactical draw and avoid destruction despite being grossly outnumbered on the battlefield iii. His missteps challenged the principles of building cohesive teams thru mutual trust, creating shared understanding, and above all, accepting prudent risks.
As a result, McClellan’s leadership skills during battles were highly questioned by President Abraham Lincoln, who eventually removed him from command iv. President Lincoln was violently opposed to appointing McClelland commander of the Union Army prior to the Battle of Antietam. The President knew of McClellan’s opposition to his policies, anti-slavery in general. Not appointing him at this critical juncture would have been met with hostility and mistrust v. Although Lincoln well understood the danger inherent in McClellan’s hostility to his own government and policies, he also knew McClellan was the only general to get the Union



Citations: 4. Bernard Cornwell. The Bloody Ground. (Harper Collins Publishers, 1996), 350. 5. Keith D. Dickson. The Civil War for Dummies. (Wiley Publishing Inc. 2001), 158 – 159. 6. Shelby Foote. The Civil War: A Narrative: Fort Sumter to Perryville. (Random House Inc. 1958), 696. 7. Webb Garrison. Civil War Tales: Unusual, Interesting Stories of the Turbulent Era When Americans Waged War on Americans. (Rutlege Hill Press, 1988), 134.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When you hear the name George McClellan, courageous, brave, heroic, and decisive are probably not the first words that come to mind. That's probably because none of those words describe him. George McClellan was an indecisive coward, unfit for his position as a general, partially because of his sympathy for his troops, but also because of his "conspiracy theories" which constantly screwed over the union troops under his leadership.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Battlefield leaders often fall under scrutiny for their decisions under fire because of the access to more information post battle. The Civil War allows for a unique opportunity to examine and scrutinize both sides of the battle because they were both US forces. Brigadier General Meagher’s impact on the Battle of Antietam is not exempt from this scrutiny, he encounters additional distain due to the opinion he was presumed to be drunk during the battle, though never proven. The Battle of Antietam was the single bloodiest day in American history and Meagher’s Brigade, the Irish Brigade, fought in some of the most intense portions of the battle. This was due to the apprehensiveness of getting decisively engaged with the Confederates from high…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Through leadership, commanders provide purpose, direction, and motivation to subordinate commanders, their staff, and Soldiers.” Unlike General McClellan, General Lee used his position to create an organization, which encouraged individual initiative. Lee handpicked his subordinate’s whom he trusted and who took initiative. Lee and his generals formed a mutually supportive team, where each had absolute trust in the others. They easily interchanged duties and troops among each other. “This team was responsible for survival at Antietam and major Confederate victories both before and after Antietam. Lee shared and discussed his strategy with his generals. He made the final decisions and granted his generals autonomy in carrying them out.”…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facing pressure from Lincoln, he made a campaign against the Confederate capital along the Virginia Peninsula, known as the Peninsula Campaign. McClellan frequently canceled his attacks, allowing his opponent more than enough time to retreat slowly toward the Richmond defenses. A surprise attack by Rebels at the battle of Seven Pines blunted the already sluggish Federal advance. Although the Union army repulsed the attacks, McClellan to again delayed any further movement, hoping for more reinforcements to come from Washington. During the battle, Confederate General Johnston was wounded, and Robert E. Lee was appointed to replace him. Taking advantage of McClellan's cautious streak. Over the course of the bloody Seven Day Battles, McClellan was forced to abandon its bid to seize Richmond and retreat to the safety of Washington. As a result, Lincoln named Henry Halleck as General-in-Chief of the army, and the Army of the Potomac was given to General John Pope.Following Pope's failure to capture Richmond the subsequent Union defeat at the battle of Second Manassas, McClellan was once again leading the army that had such strong affection for him. In 1864, McClellan became involved in politics when he was nominated to be the Democratic candidate for president against his former boss, Abraham Lincoln. McClellan ran on an anti-war platform, promising that he would…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though to Lee’s complete dismay, information regarding his plan fell into the hands of Union soldiers who brought it to McClellan's attention. Mcclellan managed to engage Lee encountering him almost 2 to 1 but was still…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essay entitled "The Military Leadership of the North and South" by Harry Willams points out the military leadership weaknesses displayed by Union and Confederate forces. Williams opens his essay by stressing and explaining the importance of leaders during a time of war. He states that "...it is the general who is the decisive factor in battle." (p.39). This is an accepted belief among many great leaders of the past. A successful leader must be able to demonstrate confidence and morale even in times of weakness, as well as capable of being wary and level-headed in times of strength. Marshal Saxe entertains the interesting fact that the North 's commanders were considerably younger than those of the South. However, age cannot be unquestionably attributed to Union victory. Generals of both sides, despite age or experience, displayed similar faults. The Confederate leaders were unexperienced in commanding and administering large armies. Nevertheless, the West Pointers had received military education that had emphasized administration and technique. As for strategy, many adopted the beliefs of Antoine Henri Jomini. His theories and beliefs formed a basis for military…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Great post this week, I really enjoyed it. I like your comment “McClellan was what seems to me as a Trojan Horse.” You are absolutely right. It makes me wonder why Lincoln selected him as the commander of the Union forces. McClellan was a passive leader and wasn’t a good tactician. What would have happened if Lee would have accepted Lincoln’s offer to command the Union forces? I believe it would have been a completely different war because Lee was aggressive and took the fight to the Union. If Lee would have commanded the Union that would have left commanding the South Jeb Stewart or Jackson, either one would have possibly made the war longer and more causalities. Thanks for you post this week!…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All the reasons have a tendency, in the author's point of view, to point to the Republican administration of the Union on the need for drastic change in the leadership of military operations, and the general approach to military and domestic policies. This is especially true of the President Lincoln, whose authority grew, and the government during the war was almost unlimited. The political analysis of the situation of the war years provided throughout the book is not the key purpose of the author of 1861: The Civil War Awakening. The real aim of Goodheart (2011) is to present it fluently as it would be frivolous and arrogant in relation to this complex, multi-dimensional process. To understand the situation of those difficult years, to understand a complex set of problems which confronted Lincoln and his administration, is possible only if a reader grasps as much as possible, in order to break through…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What They Fought for

    • 1091 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: McPherson, James M.. What they fought for 1861-1865. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: 1st anchor books, 1995. www.anchorbooks.com…

    • 1091 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Carmichael, Dirk Johnson, Sarah Childress, Rebecca Sinderbrand, Karen Breslau and Hilary Shenfield. "Civil Wars." Newsweek. 15 Dec. 2003: 42-52.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dred Scott Research Paper

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Dred Scott Decision of 1857 ruled that African-Americans, even ones who were not enslaved, were not protected under The Constitution and could never be citizens. This brings up questions that will be answered in this paper. Should slaves be American citizens? Is it morally correct for one to own another human? Does the Dred Scott decision contradict The Declaration of Independence which states that every man is created equal?…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Enthused with patriotic sentiments, civilians who chose fighting for the preservation of the Union, or perhaps to punish the rebellious South, craved the “glory” of battle. Even as the numerous state militias proudly wore gaudy, impractical uniforms and excitedly waited for the fighting, the few seasoned generals they had, attempted to whip them into a functioning army. This was not an easy task, seeing as the would-be soldiers consistently undermined any and every authority figure by ignoring orders, asking for reasons to obey, and breaking rank whenever the felt the urge. Not to mention that the number of commanders who knew how to turn civilians into warriors was dreadfully low. None of these men had a clue what was in store for them, in what would be a much longer and bloodier war than they expected. Through the excited eyes of young volunteers, the war looked to them like a “great adventure,” and those who were not be accepted went home with hanging heads.1 Men saw the Civil War as a chance to defend “The land of my childhood my love and my tears; the land of my birth and my early sunny years.”2 The sword had been drawn, and the men of the Union army gave off an aura of “passion” for the…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil War Harvard Outline

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. General McClellan of the Union was barely capable of holding back the Confederate forces from moving in any further after discovering Lee’s plans now the North had experience and now hope to win the war against the Confederation.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The succession of the Southern States had been brewing for many years; this was due to fundamental differences in agriculture and resultant adoption of slavery in the South. From early days, the thirteen states had grown up separately, and each had their own culture and beliefs, which were often incompatible with those held in other states. The geographical and cultural differences between north and south would manifest themselves at regular and alarming intervals throughout the hundred years following the drafting of the constitution. Tension increased during the 1850s, over the right to hold slaves in new territories. The Wilmot Proviso of 1846, roused bitter hostilities, and violent debate turned to physical violence during the period of 'Bleeding Kansas '. The election of Lincoln, who the South perceived to be an abolitionist, in 1860, was the final straw, and the secession of seven Southern states followed soon after.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    bhjbjh

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Realism and Naturalism 1855-1918 Characteristics of Realism • Expression of life as it is actually lived. • Factual description of ordinary characters and events rather than larger-than-life heroes in imagined settings. • Subject matter often consists of factories, slums, workers, bosses, criminals, and social outcasts. • Regionalism or local color. Focus on dialect, customs, and characters of a particular region.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays