Miranda Warning

Topics: Police, Supreme Court of the United States, Jury, United States Constitution / Pages: 4 (912 words) / Published: Jan 17th, 2013
Upon the case Miranda vs. Arizona the Supreme Court decided that citizens must be aware of their fifth and sixth Amendment rights upon questioning by the police. Fifth Amendment: “…No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself…” Sixth Amendment: “…In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.” The Supreme Court created the Miranda warning that a police officer must read to the suspect before questioning if they wish to have the evidence obtained during the questioning used in the court of law. Miranda warning: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.” If the Miranda Warning was not read to the person in custody before questioning, any evidence obtained from the suspect during the questioning shall be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Miranda Warnings
  • miranda warnings
  • Miranda Warning
  • Miranda Warnings
  • The Miranda Warning Case
  • Miranda Warning Pros And Cons
  • Miranda Warning Case Study
  • The Miranda Warning Essay Example
  • warning
  • Miranda Rights