Preview

Miranda Rights Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
535 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Miranda Rights Research Paper
Yana Stephens
U.S. Government
Mr.Mulloy
Defense Attorney:
Miranda Rights
What is Miranda Rights?
"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to be speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense."
After a person has officially been taken into custody (detained by police), but before any interrogation takes place, police must inform them of their right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. A person is considered to be "in custody" anytime they are placed in an environment in which they do not believe they are free to leave.
There are hundreds of crimes defined under the laws. If you are charged with a crime, choosing the right criminal defense attorney is the most …show more content…
You and criminal defense attorney are going to have to show at least four instances of why you had to defend yourself in such an extreme way. Your criminal defense attorney will have to show the judge or jury that you r confrontation was unprovoked by you or that you were in immediate danger of bodily harm, or that your use of force was necessary in preventing that harm, or that they amount of force you used was reasonable. If you were in a position were you had to defend yourself against an attack from someone you think means you bodily harm, it is up to you criminal defense attorney to prove that you had a reasonable belief the actions you used to defend yourself were necessary and just to prevent either you own death, the death of another, serious bodily harm. The force use against you must be unlawful or improper, and directed toward you
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Brief in Irac Format
    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Brief in Irac Format

    In order for an admission to be admissible in court, prior to interrogation, the individual must first be informed in clear and unequivocal terms that he has the right to remain silent. In addition, the warning to remain silent must be accompanied by the explanation that anything can be used against the individual in court, and that the individual has the right to have an attorney present during interrogation, and if they can not afford one, then one will be appointed to them. Also, if the individual waives his right to remain silent and for counsel to be present, the police must show that the waiver was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of But Only If You Have The Right To Be Silent By Janet Ainsworth
    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of But Only If You Have The Right To Be Silent By Janet Ainsworth

    Janet Ainsworth’s journal article, “’You Have the Right to Remain Silent. . .’ But Only If You Ask for It Just So: The Role of Linguistic Ideology in American Police Interrogation Law,” addresses the complexities that arise when attempting to invoke Miranda rights. Ainsworth begins the article by explaining how the Miranda rights were established as a compromise with its initial goal to alleviate pressure from those detained. She references the Davis v United States case as a key example due to its ruling which held that Miranda rights could only be invoked when the language used by the arrestee has a clear and unambiguous meaning.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Modern Law: The Miranda V. Arizona Case
    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page

    Modern Law: The Miranda V. Arizona Case

    The Miranda v. Arizona case is considered to be one of the most important and famous cases in modern law history that provided the foundation for some important legal provisions. It occurred in 1966 in Arizona, when a young man named Ernesto Miranda, a Mexican immigrant living in Phoenix, Arizona, was charged with robbery, kidnapping, and rape of a young woman several years prior the trial (Zalman, 2010). Before the suspect was interrogated, the police did not inform him of his constitutional right to remain silent which allowed the interrogators to get the confession. Given that this case provided the foundation for the right to remain silent, it became very famous and important. The present paper attempts to analyze the…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study
    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study

    1. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling of Miranda v. Arizona set a precedence on how future suspects would be interrogated. It makes complete sense to advise a person that is being interrogated that he or she has a right to remain silent during interrogation and that he or she has the right to have counsel present during an interrogation. It's also important that the suspect be fully aware and full understand his or her rights before the interrogation begins. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT By Harvey Wallace and Cliff Roberson(CHAPTER 9 PAGE 136)…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Section 34 Pdf
    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Section 34 Pdf

    Due to the reasons stated above, it is likely you will be let go in court if you defend yourself using section 34, 35, 36 and 37 of the criminal code. You did not use unreasonable force by only shooting him in the leg, you did not intend to kill him, and you stayed within your rights. All of these factors ensure that you have a feasible chance of being let…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    E301 Tma 02 kitchen Floor
    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    E301 Tma 02 kitchen Floor

    The apprehensive or detaining of a person in order to be forthcoming to answer an alleged or suspected crime.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Warning Pros And Cons
    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Warning Pros And Cons

    The Miranda warning is a statement that informs individuals of their Fifth Amendment rights. It is needed anytime custodial interrogation takes place or when a person has been taken into custody or has otherwise been deprived of freedom. However, the Supreme Court has said that Miranda warnings are not constitutionally guaranteed, but rather they exist to aid in the protection of Fifth Amendment rights. So essentially, the purpose of Miranda warnings are only to decide on the admissibility of evidence in a court of law.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    miranda v. arizona
    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    miranda v. arizona

    Miranda Warning: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say or do can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

    preserving liberty means to simply “maintain the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority” The miranda rights state that “you have the right to remain silent anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law” that ensures you can be justified but it doesn't mean it preserves liberty because people may argue the first amendment freedom of speech, that you should be able to say something without it being used against you which violates our freedom in the meaning justice.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Case Study
    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Case Study

    Ernesto Miranda, a mexican immigrant living in the United States, was arrested by officers Carroll Cooley and Wilfred Young at Miranda's home in Phoenix, AZ. He was put into custody and taken to a local police station. Miranda was put into police lineup and was identified by the witness, Lois Jameson. Following, Miranda was interrogated for two hours by two police officers with the Arizona police department, before making a written and signed confession of the crimes. This confession was presented at trial and Miranda was sentenced to 20-30 years in prison on each count of kidnapping and rape. The Supreme Court of Arizona found that Miranda's constitutional rights weren't personally violated, but ruled that police officers are required to…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Janet Ainsworth
    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Janet Ainsworth

    Ainsworth shows that this is not the case, as the reading of the Miranda Rights was brought about by the Supreme Court as a compromise to keep the effectiveness of interrogation without violating the rights of the suspect. By making the reading of the Miranda Rights legal and necessary, suspects are made aware of their rights but are not told how to bring them about. This also means that it is incredibly easy for suspects to waive their rights by simply using incorrect wording or even not speaking at all. The reading also serves the purpose of allowing police to interrogate. Of course, the very need for the Miranda Rights suggests that there is an innate injustice in the use of interrogation. This is because of the inherent power dynamic between the police officers and the suspects. Officers hold sway over the suspects and know very well how to use legal language. The typical suspect does not and because of this sense of powerlessness is therefore submissive to the officer, which leads to meek behavior and language. They lack the authority necessary in using legal language to bring about the actions they would require, such as a lawyer, if they even realized they were in need of…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Rights More Than Word Analysis
    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page

    Miranda Rights More Than Word Analysis

    The eagle symbolizes our freedom and the strength we have as U.S citizens.The eagle shows that we can achieve great thing if we try.The unbalance scales with the words,Miranda Rights More Than Word shows that our rights are more than just words and that we are protected by those rights. Our rights are here to protect us from interrogations because we have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. When we are questioned by the police we do not have to answer and the police can not force us to answer questions and or to…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Abolishing The Fifth Amendment
    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examples Of Abolishing The Fifth Amendment

    Criminal law by nature is interesting to most people. However, there are many citizens that misinterpret what their rights are in a court of law. For instance, the Fifth amendment is a person’s right to not self-incriminate. Defendants typically do not address the court directly. They do so through they attorney. Attorneys are “responsible for advising their clients of their right to testify, whether or not it is wise to do so, as ell as the strategic implications of that decision” (Stock, 2015, p. 712). Just because a defendant does not testify on their own behalf, should not presume guilt. The sixth amendment stipulates that a defendant has the right to an attorney and to a jury trial. This is the premise where miranda rights come into play.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom work group week 3
    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Courtroom work group week 3

    A defense attorney can either be hired by the client, or the courts can appoint one to the accused. Prosecutors are there to represent the people and that…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Importance Of Miranda Rights In Schools
    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Importance Of Miranda Rights In Schools

    In schools, students should be given Miranda type warnings to protect them from self-incrimination that they may face due to being, oftentimes, overmatched. The constitutional right should be extended to students who are questioned by law enforcement or school officials so that they are not forced to implicate others or compromise their own reputation. When students are interrogated by police or school officials the obvious authority imbalance can be intimidating and can force the juveniles to act impulsively. Miranda rights are read to those in "custody" which is loosely defined. When children are being scrutinized under the watchful eyes of authority figures, it usually feels as though they are in custody because they are unable to leave;…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics