Minnoesota V. Ronald Riff

Minnesota v. Ronald Riff The court cast of Minnesota v. Riff has different types of communication involved, and is very complex. Both oral and written communication is presented in this case. This paper will be discuss that will be involved with defense, witnesses, prosecution, and the judge. Guidelines will also be discuss, due to every trail that involve with the mention above is very important. In this case, the prosecuting attorney are to communications orally and also in writing. The prosecutor main goal is to prove to both the judge and jury that the defendant is in guilty. The prosecutor opening the statement of Riff did knowingly commit the crime of breaking, and burglary on September 30, 2011 between 12:10am and 12:20 am orally to the judge and jury. The incident located at the Marquette’s Market on 1234 Main St. Midtown, Minnesota 44333, which the owner of the market is known as Speedy Marquette. It the prosecutor choice to share his/her witnesses including all evidence with the defense attorney before trail begins and to present evidence against the defendant to both jury and the judge. “All witnesses in this case include: Otis Ripple, Soapy Water, Marty Martini, C. Sharp, Betty Bitty, Rusty Fender, Guido Concertino, and the arresting officer are orally examined by the prosecution, and then the defense.” (Curran, P. & Strauch, G.). When prosecutor finish presented their parts, then it’s a choice for the defense to present their part of evidence. The prosecutor has choices of whether to examine all the defense witnesses to set straight all their statements, and to make sure that the defense is being guilty. The defendant witnesses include: Red Chips, Ace Harte, Jacques, Orbedder, Vibes Blare, Sally Slick, Matilda Slick and Gigi Gig have all been questioned by their defense attorney. Now that the defense has finish point out their statement and all of the witness are being examined and crossed, and all evidence has been presented both orally and in