For the first evidence, there were a trace of footsteps coming out of the shower. Footsteps usually imply that someone was there or something was there but it definitely looked like a shoe trace. It couldn’t have been the husband because he was barely out the shower so he was barefoot while the footsteps looked like the trace of a shoe. We could conclude that there must’ve been someone who was in the shower when the husband died. Footsteps don’t just appear just like that, there has to someone to marks the down. …show more content…
There is no way that he slipped and rolled over in the position that he is in. The soap is also unused and definitely new. My third evidence is that the husband has his toothbrush in his hand even though he is dead. I can conclude that the husband finished taking a shower and proceeded to brush his teeth or someone might have put it there after his death.
For the fourth evidence, there is a broken glass or jar that included some type of liquid. It could’ve been some type of mouthwash or some water. They must’ve used that very often if he brought it out to use while he was brushing his teeth. How could the jar or glass be broken if he died by slipping into the cake of soap. There was a liquid which could’ve been used or he might have dropped. Someone must’ve dropped it or he broke it