Preview

Minersville School District V. Gobitis Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Minersville School District V. Gobitis Case
At times in schools, there could be disagreements and disputes between the decisions of government and the rights of individuals. Students attend school in order to become well-educated young adults. The schoolteacher’s main objective is to make sure that students are receiving the maximum amount of learning to prepare them for future endeavors. Schools educate students on citizenship and what it means to live in a democracy. Public schools are under the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, which gives citizens protection of their individual liberties from governmental interference. Public school officials must obey the demands of the Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in the 1943 case West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette …show more content…
Gobitis case. Lillian and William Gobitis came home from school and told their parents that they had been expelled from their school in Minersville Pennsylvania because they did not salute to the American flag during the morning announcements. The Gobitis family belonged to the Jehovah’s Witnesses, which bans any act that is like worshipping an image or idol, which is an offense against God. Walter Gobitis, Lillian and William’s father, asked the Minersville School Board to excuse his children from the flag-salute requirement. When the Board refused, Gobitis removed his children from the public school and enrolled them into a private school, which did not require the patriotic requirements. He then sued in the federal district in Philadelphia to stop the school board from requiring children to salute to the flag. Gobitis argued that his children’s rights to religious liberty under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution were violated. The lawyers of the Minersville School Board disagreed that the flag-salute requirement was a way to teach good citizenship and that it was a “secular regulation” that had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with patriotic education. They also argued that if they let students opt out of the patriotic ceremonies, it would conflict with the school’s responsibility to promote national loyalty and unity. However, the Court voted …show more content…
Barnette asked the federal district to stop enforcement of the requirements of the patriotic exercises. A three-judge panel granted Barnette’s request. Judge John J. Parker stated that the flag-salute requirement was “violative of religious liberty when required of persons holding the religious views of the plaintiffs.” After the board’s decision, no more Jehovah’s Witnesses were expelled from schools for not saluting to the flag. The decision was then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and by a 6-3 vote they ruled that it was unconstitutional for public school officials to require students to salute and pledge allegiance to the flag at the risk of expulsion from school on June 14th, 1943. “The Barnette Court couched its decision in language evoking freedom of speech. The choice to salute the flag was speech, the Court said, and the First Amendment protected individuals from compelled speech. It almost did not matter that the Jehovah's Witnesses had religious objections to pledging allegiance to the American flag; neither they, nor anyone, could be forced to verbally espouse beliefs they did not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The usage of historical litigations serves several purposes. First, Lefkowits employs Serrano V. Priest litigation as a supporting detail of his assertion that people started going to court after realizing that it was constitutionally right for them to have the right public education. Secondly, the author helps us understand the establishment of the states power to regulate taxation and educational reforms using the example case of San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriquez. Although this case was an ineffective attempt in proposing inadequate school funding, it was the inauguration of state power. As Lefkowits explains, “In this case, the U.S Supreme Court held that although education is one of the most important state services, it is not “within the limited category of rights…

    • 922 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1949 a law was made in Pennsylvania that public schools must start each school day with ten bible verses being read, however, there could be no comment on the verses that were read. Students would stand and say the verses along with the teachers. They would then have the students recite the Lord's Prayer. If the teachers refused to read the verses every morning they could be fired. This law angered some people because they believed it was a violation of the First Amendment and so two families sued.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 6–3 decision of the majority was delivered by Justice Steven. For his majority opinion, the Alabama law "silence meditation or voluntary prayer" was unconstitutional. He found that was just to promote religion. He also found the implication of the words "voluntary prayer" as an issue of the Alabama law. The Justice Steven just focused on the purpose behind the law. The word "voluntary prayer" is not a protecting the student 's right but it encourage them to voluntary to prayer. One of the Judge also agree with his decision, Judge W.Brevard Hand, ruled prayer decisions in public school were wrong because this law is not apply to the states. As many states, they want to have the same decision and to make the world more successful. They both agree with Wallace v. Jaffree that use instructional times for silent school prayer and in public school are wrong. But with that decision, Justice William Rehnquist disagreed with them. He declared and endorses prayer in public school, even the religious in this situation. In addition, The District Court permitted the prayers to continue, because they ultimately held that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment does not prohibit a state from establishing a religion. ("Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)"). But the Court of Appeals ruled that they were unconstitutional, because the court had considered and had rejected the historical arguments. Because of that, the state appealed to the Supreme Court. When the law appealed to the Supreme Court, the Former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart noted that they did it as the establishment of a religion of secularism. Also, after many decision, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren has angered southern conservatives that as many reason they made even more resentment that lead to many problem. Some people of Christian thought it would be good if the prayers at school. But the Supreme Court still…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ps/537-544 Chapter 4

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    8. To sum up the rulings, public schools can’t do what? But, individuals can do what?…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the law required parents to send their children to school until the age of sixteen. The state’s interest in universal education against the parents’ fundamental right to freely exercise religion. However, it was determined in this case that the right of free exercise outweighed the interests of the state. Therefore, Court concluded that the parents had demonstrated the sincerity of their religious beliefs and that complying with the law would interfere with their ability to live that life and religion as…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three years later, the controversy appeared in court again as West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette. The case was brought forward on behalf of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. At this point in time, three of the justices that had ruled on the prior case had been replaced. In a 6-3 decision, the court overruled the prior Gobitis resolution and determined that the former resolution violated the students’ freedom of speech and freedom of religion which are guaranteed in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the U.S. Although it is up to schools and the government to teach students about patriotism and the importance of our American flag, it is not the role of our public school system to punish students that choose to not participate in the pledge.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court to review the ruling of the court. In 1984 the court made up their mind about the ruling in 1981, now they had to decide if the ruling in 1982 was constitutional. Jaffree argued that the ruling in 1982 was not constitutional, he argued that previous school prayer cases invalidated his case. The court ruled that the ruling in 1982 did not “in any way offend the Constitution”. The court said it “neither proscribes prayer; nor affirms religious belief; nor coerces religious exercise.”…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a very high priced and respected legal advisor I would advise Ms. Charmander of her legal rights. I would also advise her of her duties as a teacher. In this scenario Ms. Charmander has an academic freedom to decide what she wants to teach in her classroom. She also feels as if the Pledge of Allegiance is promoting the endorsement of religion. Which is not allowed in a public school setting. Her students also have a 1st amendment right to hear and say the Pledge of Allegiance. The state cannot prevent people from practicing or expressing themselves as long as they are not disruptive. Ms. Charmander also has the responsibility to teach what the school has set in their curriculum. Teachers are generally allowed some of their own freedoms in how they deliver their curriculum. In this case it seems if the school is set on this particular subject. In fact…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Gobitis case called into questions the degree to which a government can protrude into an individual’s life and restrict their personal freedom. Walter Gobitis-the father of the two children who were expelled because they refused to say the pledge as a cause of it went against their religious beliefs-argued that under the 1st and 14th amendment, his children’s rights had been violated: their freedom of religion and their rights to due process of liberty. There was also a catch-22 in this situation because the children were now considered ‘truant’ since they were not attending school, so law enforcement had the right to arrest their father for harboring delinquents. Martin Luther King Jr. described this form of discrimination as he “sat in Birmingham because injustice is here” (King 13). Martin Luther King Jr. evokes many elements of pathos in his letter in order to emphasize the injustices that have befallen him and other African Americans like him, which parallels to the Gobitis family and other Jehovah’s Witnesses who were being treated unfairly just because of something they believed in. The school board countered that the expulsion of students who did not comply with the rules was precisely a secular regulation, nothing to do with religion. However, it had everything to do with religion because it forced them to recite an oath that was against their religious beliefs and that went against their 1st amendment rights to freedom of religion…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ken starr

    • 292 Words
    • 1 Page

    Starr notes the case of Westside High School, where a girl was trying to conduct a bible study and was denied the ability by the school. When the girl filed in court, the case round its way up to the Supreme Court, and Bridget eventually won. There have been numerous cases like this one, included the multiple Jehovah Witness’s cases. As Starr continues to site other cases in history of the issue of religion, he notes that religious liberty is ‘our first liberty’. Parents of students in schools soon began to bring suits of prayers in public schools, calling it an unconstitutional establishment of religion. The pledge of allegiance has been called into question, because of the “Under God” portion. In the end, the constitution states that freedom of religion means the freedom to chose a religion, or to not to. Religion for the most part is grounded in morals and ethics, as much of law theory and practice, therefore creating a grey area where the two can mix. Stare Desis has shown it to be a controversial subject, and it shall continue to be one in the future.…

    • 292 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Goodwin, a 79-year-old Nixon Court appointee, wrote in the decision: "A profession that we are a nation 'under God' is identical to a profession that we are a nation 'under Jesus,' a nation 'under Vishnu,' a nation 'under Zeus,' or a nation 'under no god.' " The addition of "under God" in the pledge forces schoolchildren to swear allegiance to "monotheism," Goodwin wrote, impermissibly taking a position on the "existence and identity of God." The court decision unleashed a fury of religious protests, including by many in Congress, to their lasting shame”Newdow’s case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme court, which in a cop-out in 2004, ruled that Newdow as the noncustodial parent did not have standing to bring the lawsuit. A new case by Newdow is once again before the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The Freedom From Religion Foundation is also challenging the recitation of the pledge in New Hampshire schools, in a case brought with Dr. Newdow and plaintiff-members (Freedom from Religion Foundation). The issue is one of a serious level of consideration. Another case that has been largely viewed is Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947). U.S. Constitution provide: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being a principal is a very important position. I believe that when the principal has high expectations and morals that the whole school benefits. When the principal is an example of someone with high standards the teachers, staff, and students will benefit from that example. My goal as a future administrator is to be firm but fair. In order for me to ensure that I am fair in my decisions, I need to be current school law. As times change, so the laws. In this toolkit, I will show which twelve resources will be imperative to ensure that my school runs smoothly. In this toolkit, you will find the following topics: Federal School Law, State School Law and the Revised Code of Washington, Religion in Schools, IEP and 504 Law, Student Discipline, Staff Discipline, School Economic Law, Charter School Law, Becca Law, Copyright Law, Tort Law, and Miscellaneous School Law.…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Review

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When the rights of the American citizen are on the line than the judiciary should utilize the powers invested in them to protect and enforce what is constitutional. However, in times of controversy, where personal preference or aspects of religious or personal nature are at hand, the judiciary should exercise their power with finesse, thereby acting out judicial restraint. An example of such is in the case of Engel v. Vitale where Mr. Justice Black delivered the opinion of the court directing the School District’s principal to read a prayer at the commencement of each school day. In cases that do not regard whether an action is constitutional or not, the judiciary should suppress their power of judicial review.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Modern public schools today are constantly publicized in the news for shootings and bullying. The cases continue to add up and it leaves Americans with the troubling question: Is public schooling actually benefiting our kids? If this question were asked eighty years ago, the answer would be a resounding yes because it saved students from being exploited for their labor but that problem no longer exists today (Source E). Schools that claim to be about the individual and are dedicated to focusing on each of its students needs have transformed into conforming prisons with captives who yearn to be released from their suffocating grips. If the schooling system has any hope of gaining back its credibility, it needs to put all of its efforts into the individual and creating a curriculum to fit the needs of every student individually.…

    • 556 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prayer in School

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During the time I attend school thee was not an issue whether we started our day with a prayer. In February 2002 the U.S. Supreme Court left school officials and lawyers puzzled about the law governing students leading prayer voluntary. Although students are free to pray on their on time or with friends, the religion liberty is protected by Constitution (Stevens, Justice in Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe).…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays