Preview

Mill's Utilitarianism Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
304 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mill's Utilitarianism Analysis
Analysis
Thesis: Objectors of Utilitarianism states that there is no time for calculating and weighing the effects on utilizing the general happiness. On the contrary, Mill says that mankind has been learning by experience the tendency of actions in order to know what is right and wrong. The rules of morality is improvable, therefore we should pass all that experience on others. However, improving the rules of morality is one thing, but to educate it to the younger is another; since there is still much to learn about the effects of actions on general happiness, and all rational people go through life with their minds made up on the common questions of right and wrong.
Reasons:
1. Philosopher and the human: They have to acquire experience about the effects of some actions on their happiness and improving it or at least maintain it.
2. Traveler: Mill uses the traveler going for his destination as for if a man needs to follow the rules of general happiness, we should open the way and direct him to the knowledge, and not to forbid it.
3. Sailors: They go to sea with it calculated on the Nautical Almanac. Therefore, as for the people, they go on the sea of life with a made up mind on the common questions of right and wrong, and more complicated questions of wise and foolish.
Discussion: Mill’s defend against the objectors of Utilitarianism is that the rules of general happiness are made up by the experience of the people. Also, it is improvable by teaching it to the younger and other people. But, he also argues that human are rational creature. Human are capable of answering the questions of right and wrongness by their own experience, and they also capable of learning and experiencing more on their way of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain the Main Strengths of Mill's Utilitarianism
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain the Main Strengths of Mill's Utilitarianism

    Mill separates pleasure into higher and lower as that he thinks some pleasure like higher is more for the soul and are long term and will benefit you as a person and the lower pleasures which are more material and offer short term pleasure but not the sort that lasts. He use the saying ‘Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfies; Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied‘ to show the differences between the two pleasures as that you can be a human dissatisfied which is better than being a pig who is satisfied as that you are may not be happy or content but you are doing good which is better than someone who is happy and content but doing bad. Mill is considered a rule utilitarian.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Mills
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marx and Mills

    John Stuart Mill suggests that a person's ethical decision-making process should be based solely upon the amount of happiness that the person can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks certain criteria for which happiness can be considered. Happiness should be judged, not only by pleasure, but by pain as well. This paper will examine Mill's position on happiness, and the reasoning behind it. Showing where there are agreements and where there are disagreements will critique the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will reveal what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the guidelines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that one should guide his or her judgements by what will give pleasure. Mill believes that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism also states that the actions of a person should be based upon the "greatest happiness principle". This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill further explores the need for pleasure by noting "a being of higher faculties requires more to make him happy." . He acknowledges that some pleasures are more alluring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing value in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mill's criteria for happiness is easily understood, some statements that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is directly related to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be absurd if someone's goal in life was to be poor and…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism
    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill Utilitarianism

    Classical economists analyzed the nature of value primarily on the labor theory. Without a clear grasp of the concept of demand, Smith, Malthus and Ricardo often raise confusing and self-contradictory explanations of the definition of “value.” The utilitarianists, like Jeremy Bentham and J. S. Mill, offered a revolutionary approach to understand the demand-side of the economy. They consider the usefulness of the product as a whole rather than its process of production. In the development of the utilitarianism, reformists present a much more realistic, practical and comprehensive discussion of the nature of the economy: the necessity of comparative utilities, the concern about the distribution and quality of the utility, the key social influence…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Utilitarianism or God, Do We Have to Choose?
    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Utilitarianism or God, Do We Have to Choose?

    An important part of this discussion is based on understanding what is happening with society nowadays. Societies all around the world are becoming more and more individualists, what is causing problems that can affect the whole world, problems such as terrorists attacks, war or even in a lower but maybe more important scale hunger. This is basically happening because every single member of every society is only looking after themselves instead of the group, they are only trying to progress individually, but most of these individuals forget that to really achieve the top you need help, and that help comes from other individuals. The following part of the paper will try to clarify the biblical view of Mill's theory, the Utilitarianism.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    »Explain Why Mill Distinguishes Between Higher and Lower Pleasures and Assess Whether He Achieves His Aim or Not.«
    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    »Explain Why Mill Distinguishes Between Higher and Lower Pleasures and Assess Whether He Achieves His Aim or Not.«

    In his Essay Utilitarianism Mill elaborates on Utilitarianism as a moral theory and responds to misconceptions about it. Utilitarianism, in Mill's words, is the view that »actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.«1 In that way, Utilitarianism offers an answer to the fundamental question Ethics is concerned about: ‘How should one live?' or ‘What is the good or right way to live?'.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is the 'Philosophy of Swine' Objection a Telling Criticism of Utilitarian Theory?
    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is the 'Philosophy of Swine' Objection a Telling Criticism of Utilitarian Theory?

    Riley, Jonathan. Liberal Utilitarianism: social choice theory and J.S.Mill’s Philosophy. Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criticism of John Mill
    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criticism of John Mill

    Two criticisms of utilitarianism influence Mill towards rule-utilitarianism. The first criticism involves objectors viewing this philosophy as encouraging society to do what is expedient for the moment (22). The second objection proposes “that there is not time, previous to action, for calculating and weighing the effects of any line of conduct on the general happiness” (23). Mill argues both of these objections by taking rule-utilitarianism into consideration. Rule- utilitarianism states that a rule should be adopted and followed when it promotes the general happiness better than any competing rule” (class notes, 27 October 2011).…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill's Argument Analysis
    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's Argument Analysis

    I will then explore a potential objection to Mill’s argumentative strategy regarding Mill’s definition of “happiness” and its components, as well as potential responses from Mill or his supporters. Subsequently, I will examine what effect, if any, this contention has on Mill’s argument as a whole for utilitarianism as a moral guideline. Through this discussion of Mill’s hedonistic argument, I will show that although Mill’s broad definition of the components of happiness establishes that happiness or pleasure is the only thing we intrinsically desire, it also weakens utilitarianism’s function as a moral…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Of John Stuart Mill's Essay 'In Defense Of Utilitarianism'
    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Of John Stuart Mill's Essay 'In Defense Of Utilitarianism'

    Moral theories try to explain what distinguishes right actions from wrong ones. The theory of utilitarianism tries to do the same by incorporating several aspects that set up a moral standard to help investigate the balance between right and wrong. John Stuart Mill, a British philosopher of the 1800’s defends the utilitarian school of thought by pointing out what it is that makes utilitarianism the standard theory for morality. According to Utilitarianism as explained by Mill in his essay “In Defense of Utilitarianism” the fundamental principle of morality is the promotion of happiness on a scale that benefits an individual and the ones around him; also to promote pleasure and to prevent pain.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill The Subjection Of Women
    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill The Subjection Of Women

    John Stuart Mill was known most famously for his defense of utilitarianism and personal liberty. Mill worked his whole life to promote utilitarianism. Utilitarianism, as defined by Mill himself was “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain the privation…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Stuart Mill Approaches To Happiness Essay
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Approaches To Happiness Essay

    Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism establish different views on where an individual’s happiness comes from. Aristotle believes that happiness comes from virtue, while John Stuart Mill believes in the Greatest Happiness Principle, which states that pleasure and absence of pain are what make up someone’s happiness. Happiness is a topic discussed in great detail in both works with both individuals presenting different viewpoints.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism Theory
    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill's Utilitarianism Theory

    Our morality, which is what, is right and what is wrong is based on our decisions and actions we make each and every day. Unlike animals that rely solely on instinct alone, we as human beings have the ability to make our own decisions based upon our beliefs. You have to ask yourself what is more important to you, is it morally right to pleasure the masses even if it causes harm to some people which is Mills Utilitarianism theory or do you do what is logically and morally right according to universal law like Kant’s deontological theory. In Bernard Williams experiment against Utilitarianism Jim is put in a very difficult situation with only two options and can either not kill any of the Indians or kill one of them himself. In this scenario their…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ultimate Sanction Of The Principle Of Utility By John Mill Analysis
    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ultimate Sanction Of The Principle Of Utility By John Mill Analysis

    Happiness is different for every person. Happiness is defined by each individual person and their beliefs. Mill believes that if something gives you pleasure and happiness good things will happen but he also believes that individuals by nature are selfish. Because pleasure and happiness comes from a person’s own feelings and belief’s defining things as good and bad can be difficult. What is good for one person is not always good for another. Someone might consider a particular experience to be good but another person sees it as bad based on their previous experience, so it won’t…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism
    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    In Chapter two, Mill tries to reply to some common misconceptions about utilitarianism. He claims that many people mistake utility as the rejection of pleasures, whereas in reality, it is pleasure itself, promoting happiness. He thus defines utilitarianism as the creed which “holds that actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness”. Accordingly pleasure and absence of pain are the only goals that are inherently good and desirable in themselves. Every other action or experience is only insofar good as it promotes pleasure. However, it is wrong to assume people should only do what makes them personally happy. Instead the standard of judging an act is the happiness of all people. Therefore people shouldn’t distinguish between their own…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill S Utilitarianism
    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mill S Utilitarianism

    1. The main topic discussed in Mill’s for is obviously Utilitarianism and his own interpretation of the definition and what it means. Mill also talks about the misconception people have about utilitarianism and the basis behind his theory. Mill interprets utilitarianism and describes it as happiness and pleasure. He describes how people seek happiness with only the absence of pain. Mill’s theory also goes on the dictate that there are different levels of happiness and it can come in different amounts and quality. Every desire a person has results in seeking happiness. Mill also accounts that the goal to a virtuous life and the ultimate goal of happiness can be achieved with the help of utilitarianism. Mill also goes into great detail on his meaning of happiness and the ups and downs they eventually lead to a virtuous life. Mill also talks about justice and how the rights and regulations set by authority are only in order to help people overall achieve happiness. Mill argues that a person’s actions are good when they lead to pleasure or happiness and bad when they produce the opposite. Mill agrees that some forms of pleasure are better than others and can be easily compared by an individual. Once the greatest form of happiness is achieved, then everything can be based off of that and it can be easier to dictate the highs and lows of ones happiness. Mill also talks about when people make judgments they do so with the overall goal of self-happiness and wouldn’t usually do something that wouldn’t be beneficial for their own good. Mill also makes a good point that only the people who have experienced the highs and lows of happiness can be a fair judge of the quality of pleasure. For example Mill states, “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied.” Mill also argues that it is not only correct for people to strive for what makes them personally happy, but to increase the overall amount of happiness in the world. There…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More