Preview

Microsoft Corporation's Antitrust Laws

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
274 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Microsoft Corporation's Antitrust Laws
In May of 1998, Microsoft Corporation was charged with violating parts of the Sherman act through a civil antitrust action, which would take place in the district court. This case was brought about by the 20 states of the US and by the District of Columbia. Since Microsoft was such a large corporation, there was a five-day period where they would make certain information confidential to the public in order to protect trade secrets from getting out. “The Microsoft
Corporation violated the nation’s antitrust laws through predatory and anticompetitive behavior and kept “an oppressive thumb on the scale of competitive fortune,” a federal judge ruled today”
(Brinkley, NY Times). Microsoft was creating a monopoly through their software by stifling

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This file of ECON 545 Week 3 Discussion Question 2 Anti-Trust Policy and Microsoft consists of: Is Microsoft a monopoly? In what ways could it be consi...…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 7 Case Study

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages

    had seemingly secured its position in the tech market as a top of the line brand with a…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    upheld to prevent the loss of customers, and frivolous lawsuits. This brings me to my…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    An additional issue is what does “active market participant” mean? The Court defined it as someone “who possess singularly strong private interests.” In this case, that appears to mean someone who works in the industry and has an interest in limiting competition in the industry. In summary, the Supreme Court did not make it clear what “controlled by active market participants” meant in the decision, and therefore that is likely to be a major point of contention going forward. As will be discussed later, the FTC guidance will likely serve as a major source of information on this…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    see if Microsoft was trying to create a monopoly of the computer software market. They…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Microsoft later made a deal with Novell. They agreed not to sue each other’s customers for patent infringement, which is okay because it’s something that Richard Stallman’s GPL…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In United States v. Patten, 226 U.S. 525 (U.S. 1913), the defendants were charged with violating the Sherman Anti-trust Act by conspiring to run a corner on the cotton market. Ultimately, Patten was attempting to raise the prices of cotton throughout the country. The Supreme Court sustained the charges against the defendant of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Petitioner V Negligence Case

    • 4763 Words
    • 20 Pages

    1 of 3 DOCUMENTS M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. TIMBERLINE SOFTWARE CORPORATION and SOFTWORKS DATA SYSTEMS, INC., Respondents. No. 67796--4 SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON 140 Wn.2d 568; 998 P.2d 305; 2000 Wash. LEXIS 287; CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P15,893; 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 357 October 26, 1999, Oral Argument Date May 4, 2000, Filed PRIOR HISTORY: [***1] Appeal from Superior Court, King County. 95--2--31991--2. Honorable Phillip Hubbard, Judge. DISPOSITION: Court of Appeals affirmed, upholding trial court's order of summary judgment of dismissal and denial of motions to vacate and amend. LexisNexis(R) Headnotes COUNSEL: For Petitioner: Bradley L. Powell, Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker Llp, Seattle, WA, Catherine…

    • 4763 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In December of 2011 (Kanter, 2011, p. 3) the European antitrust authority started an investigation against Apple and five publishing companies for antitrust after receiving several complaints that they were price fixing on their e-books. The publishing companies were Penguin, HarperCollins, Hachette Livre, Simon & Schuster, and Macmillan. These companies were accused of going against the Antitrust Law called the Sherman Act. Apple and the publishing companies were using market power and collusion by working together to provide a raised price with their e-books for their customers who read these books on Apple’s devices. (Kanter, 2011, p. 3) Shortly after the European antitrust authority started their investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice started an investigation as well. (New Zealand Hearold, 2011)…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    apple antitrust

    • 113340 Words
    • 454 Pages

    Given your research and findings, are monopolies and oligopolies (firms demonstrating power) always bad for society? Be sure to provide real world examples of where this may be the case to strengthen your position.…

    • 113340 Words
    • 454 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | In order to ensure employee and public question and other inquisitions quick and sufficiently…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    High Tech Offenders

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    25 men were arrested and 11 where proven guilty in the national copy right Microsoft counter…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Microsoft Antitrust Case

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Justice department stated that Microsoft violated anti-trust laws by requiring computer makers to install Internet Explorer on computers as a condition of licensing (Wikipedia).…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trade Secret

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Trade secrets are, after all, recognized as confidential under many laws, which provide penalties for the breach of confidentiality.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    May 1988 the united state department of justice took Microsoft to court over the abuse of its monopoly power on operation systems for personal computers. Microsoft was bundling its flagship Internet explorer software with its Microsoft windows operating system. This gave Microsoft the advantage in browsers because all Microsoft windows user had a copy of Microsoft explorer. The other web browsers (Firefox, Netscape navigator or opera) if free were slow to download or had to be purchased in a store.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays