Preview

Michaela Griffith's Causation Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
260 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Michaela Griffith's Causation Case Study
Michaela Griffith

Causation
­Fiona points a gun at Graham and who has a sudden heart attack and dies. The thin skull rule states that F has to take the victim G as she finds him, this means that although G had a heart condition and F may not have know this, that she will be held liable for the full extent of G's death, although she did not directly kill him. BLAUE (1975) In relation to causation 'But For' F not pointing a gun at G, G would not have had a heart attack and died. Therefor F is the factual cause of Gs death. She wouldn't be the factual cause of death if the death would have occurred anyway. WHITE (1910). Legal causation will be easier to establish. The De Minimis Principle states that F not need be the sole or the main cause of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Cooke J Law of Tort Ninth Edition, 9thed, 2009, C1 General Principle of Tort Law. P6…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LSTD301 QUIZ 1

    • 259 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To meet the intent element required for possession, a defendant should be aware of the possession.…

    • 259 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * This is a will contest case involving a codicil to the Last Will and Testament of Wheelock A. Bisson, M.D., deceased.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A guilty mind is the second general feature that has to be established and is probably the most complex because it involves subjective evaluation of the mind.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cobra Event

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    she had gotten that no one had known at the time. She has a terrible seizure and dies at the…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation refers to whether the defendant's conduct caused the harm or damage in a crime and it must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. Factual causation is the starting point and consists of applying the 'but for' test. In most cases, factual causation alone will be enough to establish causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation. Legal causation is when the result must be caused by a culpable act, the act of the defendant may not necessarily need to be the only cause, but must be more than minimal. Factual causation is established by applying the 'but for' test. This asks, 'but for the actions of the defendant, would the result have occurred?' If the answer is yes, the result would have occurred in any circumstance and the defendant is not liable. If no the defendant is liable as it can be said that their action was a factual cause of the result.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    pet peeve

    • 758 Words
    • 3 Pages

    5. Add the final cause of death to the 6.1.2 Autopsy report. Add a summary paragraph that explains how you came to this conclusion as well as any factors that contributed to her final demise.…

    • 758 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    another person or intent to inflict an injury likely to cause death in order to establish…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Doctrine of Double Effect

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The doctrine of double effect if often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm, such as the death of a human being, as a side effect of promoting good ends. It is claimed that sometimes it is permissible to cause such harm as a side effect of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such harm as a means to bringing about the same good end. The reasoning is summarized with the claim that sometimes it is permissible to bring about as merely foreseen side effect a harmful event that it would be impermissible to bring about intentionally (Uniacke 1984).…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    History Fiftieth Gate

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    she was the sole survivor in the town and could not provide documented evidence to…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    him, she took over the cannon and fired it until she was shot. She didn’t die but the…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causation and Correlation

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are many similarities between causation and correlation but there are also just as many differences. Causation is when one or more factors contribute to the effect. As said in the PowerPoint review, for example, if you switch a light switch on it causes the light turns on. The one factor of flipping the light switch on causes the effect of the light to turn on. Correlation is when two or more factors contribute to one effect. There is two different types of correlation. One type of correlation is high correlation which is when the factors all match up in a row to cause the effect. Low correlation is when the results of one factor are scattered but a pattern can be recognized. The similarities between causation and correlation are that they both require factors that can point to a result. But remember that correlation is not causation. One factor does not mean it will make the effect happen. The difference between causation and correlation is causation has a direct factor that has a direct effect, correlation is many factors can possibly lead to an effect. Also correlation can have lurking factors. For instance, there are more studies being done on lung cancer because of higher rates of lung cancer. Why are there more studies on lung cancer? There are more studies because the increase of tobacco use. The lurking factor is the increase of tobacco use.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Causation and Correlation

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The statement “People with long hair do better on audio memory tests” is in fact a correlation, it is not a very strong correlation but it is indeed one.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Post Mortem Paper

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The State v. Dreher specifically shows its liability as a reliable, evidentiary statement in today’s court cases. State v. Dreher, (1997), was an appellate division court case within the superior court of New Jersey where defendant John W. Dreher challenged the judgment of the State Court of New Jersey that convicted him of purposeful and knowing murder of his wife. In this case, the medical examiner considered a variety of different factors, with respect to time of death, including the concentration of vitreous potassium following the death of the defendant’s wife. Even though not an exact science, State v. Dreher (1997) stated that “the victim's potassium concentration level was 7.3 milliequivalents per liter” which led to the estimation that the victim had died ten hours earlier, give or take four hours (1997, p. 34). As noted by the medical examiner, “since her vitreous fluid was drawn at 5:40 p.m., she died sometime between 3:40 a.m. and 11:40 a.m. but probably closer to 7:40 a.m.” carefully stating only a range rather than a precise time (1997, p.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good evening Your Honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, and opposing counsel. Tonight you heard the testimony and evidence in Roughed Grouse High School's attempt to hide, justify, and deny their negligent actions. In order to prove Roughed Grouse High School's negligence resulting in the death of Jordan Simon, I, along with my co-counsel, had to prove our case, not beyond a reasonable doubt, but simply by a preponderance of evidence. In other words, if you were to put the evidence favoring the case of the plaintiff and evidence favorable to the defendant on a scale, we the plaintiff would have to make the scales tip ever so slightly in our favor. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we have done just that. We have proved to you tonight by a preponderance of evidence, not that the defendant was solely responsible for the unfortunate and untimely death of Jordan Simon, but that those representing Roughed Grouse High School were more negligent above all others involved.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics