Michael Blair Case Analysis Essay

Michael Blair was faced with multiple charges and years in prison for something he did not do. First Blair would be faced with a really long time in prison for capital murder. Wednesday, Blair was charged with capital murder because of the death of Ashley Nicole Estell, who was abducted on Sept. 4 from a crowded park in Plano, Texas (McFarland). This shows what Michael was charged with capital murder against a Texas teen, Ashley Estell, on September 4th from a crowded park. Second, Blair was already a convicted felon and claimed that he was innocent. A convicted sex offender that was 23 years old was charged with capital murder, says that he did not commit the abduction and killing of a Texas girl (McFarland). This goes more into personal detail about the convicted murderer, Michael Blair, and the fact that he is pleading innocent in this capital murder charge. Michael Blair knew that he was not guilty of capital murder against Ashley Estell, but he would have a long fight ahead of him to get exonerated. The investigation would make him seem more guilty, than innocent.
It is never a good thing for
Firstly, Burnette would spend a great deal of time in prison for a rape he didn’t commit. DNA testing has cleared a 30 year old Richmond man Victor Burnette of a rape charge in 1979, even though the woman who identified him says she doesn’t believe the test results (Mather). So even though Victor was proven innocent by DNA tests, the victim refuses to believe he is innocent. Secondly, the final bill that Victor was purposed with was outrageous. Convicted of a 1979 rape he did not commit is upset with a proposed $107,078 payment to compensate him for eight years he spent in prison (Green). Basically, Victor has to pay 107,000 dollars for the jail time he did not deserve in the first place. The fact that Mr. Burnette had to serve jail time and a fine of $107,000 is absolutely