Preview

Michael Behe's Explanation For The Creation Of The Universe

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
357 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Michael Behe's Explanation For The Creation Of The Universe
Creationism is often disputed by philosophers and scientists about whether it is an acceptable explanation for the creation of the universe. The majority of scientists claim that there is no room for religion in the creation of the universe and that the creation can be explained only with science. However there are a small group of scientists that believe the God of classical theism had taken part in the creation of universe.

One example is Michael Behe. As a professor of biochemistry he believes that some aspects of the universe are too intricate to have just evolved through evolution. He focuses on the flagellum of bacterium, he argues that the flagellum is far too complex to have developed through evolution and therefore there must be someone who created something as complex. Behe concluded that the creator must be God. Another scientist that also uses God in a scientific explanation is modern physicist Paul Davies. He believes that the universe is special in the way it works according to mathematical principles; suggesting that there is evidence for God.
…show more content…
He believes that the theory of natural selection, proposed by Darwin, is sufficient enough to explain the complexity of the natural world. As an atheist, Dawkins does not believe in God and states that religion and science are completely different things. Many scientists use the Big Bang theory to suggest that the universe was not created by God but it’s creation can be explained by science. Some philosophers believe that the universe is self explanatory; Bertrand Russell being one of them. He believed that the universe is a brute fact: “It’s just there and that is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this lab simulation, we studied the different factors that go into natural selection. These factors were things such as: fertility, the complexity of genes, the use of natural selection versus not using it, and the rate of mutation. All of these things would then affect the amount of generations it would take to get the “target phrase.” This target phrase was used as a tool to understand the complexity of some genes compared to the simplicity of others. The first chapter in Dawkins’ book, “The Blind Watchmaker,” correlates the most when it comes to what we studied in the lab. In the first chapter, he describes that complex things such as animals must have been made by design. However, he also explains that this designer is…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stephen Hawking, one of the World’s leading scientists, released a new book in 2010 called, ‘The Grand Design.’ He and his co-author, Leonard Mlodinow, stated that, ‘you don’t need God to create the universe because the laws of gravity and a certain version of quantum physics suffice to make it inevitable that the universe will create itself, out of nothing, in an infinite variety of forms; and given an infinite variety of forms, a segment or sub-universe friendly to mankind is bound to develop, no design needed, grand or not.’ He also later on in the book writes that, ‘spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.’ Both of these quotes are strong evidence that the universe is an accidental one, and there is no such thing as a creator or a created universe.…

    • 677 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Darwinian evolution theory came out 150 years ago when it was first introduced in On the Origin of Species in 1859, nowadays there are still many people who firmly believe in the creationism, even some who are well educated. In chapter three of River Out of Eden Richard Dawkins brings out this situation and refutes creationism by citing scientific experiments, and finally he points out that gradualism is a principle of the evolution nature world, one that becomes indispensable when one is trying to explain complex phenomena.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dawkins wrote a book called the The God Delusion, where he explains his many arguments against faith. Dawkins believes that religion is unnecessary, and at times dangerous, and that science is the only realm that people should be concerned with. Much of what Dawkins argues in his book is that although the world seems to have some natural order, that can all be attributed to evolution through natural selection. He believes that the critical flaw in religious people’s views is that they perceive a natural order in the world and attribute this to God. Dawkins writes in his book that “Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is the belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence.” “Faith can be very very dangerous, and deliberately to implant it into the vulnerable mind of an innocent child is a grievous wrong.” Essentially Dawkins argues that faith is a way of avoiding the difficult and complex questions in life. Dawkins also believes that teaching children faith is dangerous and unfair, as children do not have the ability or knowledge to dispute religion at a young age. This results in children believing religion as fact, without giving them the opportunity to decide what they believe in for themselves. Dawkins provides his logic on why God does not exist, he states “The temptation [to attribute the…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Experiences, circumstances and values shape the way we think, and give us a foundation for what will become our “worldview.” In order to make a decision on what these beliefs are, we can make judgments based on both faith and scientific knowledge. The origin of Progressive Creationism brings lessons from the Bible into balance with evidence from contemporary science. Progressive Creationism makes room for explanations to scientific findings by interpreting a much longer time frame for creation, but it does not negate an God as being present at every stage, and responsible for the miracles of the creation of life. Influences that have led me to consider this position come from family, church, science classes, and my own personal interpretation…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. What is Dawkins' basis or argument about religion? Do you think he’s right or wrong? Give reasons for your opinion. If he interviewed you, what would have to…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to say that an idea is more than a theory, we must first understand the many definitions of the word “theory”. Dawkins says that two of the definitions are of importance here. In the first definition, theory is described as an accepted idea that explains facts and it has been confirmed or proven. The second definition describes theory as a hypothesis or idea used to try to explain facts, an explanation through a personal view. Dawkins says that scientists use the first definition and creationists use the second.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He solely bases his beliefs on the quantity of evidence held by each side, using scientific evidence when regarding evolution and biblical literalism when regarding creationism. Dawkins from his statement concludes that based on his studies, all the evidence points towards evolution, implying that the Bible or any other religious book or testament is not a sufficient amount of data to conclude that the belief that life was created by a divine being is legitimate. Furthermore, Dawkins’ argument is captivating by distinctly claiming that he believes in one side over the other, averting from flaw of the “Integration” model, where science and religion can be basically unified as if they were in the same field of study. Additionally, Dawkins mentions the lack of evidence creationism has which can be compared to a film in which a character had the same problem,…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    but does some of his own opinions as well. One of Dawkins views is that when it comes to religion people usually believe what their parents do: what they grew up believing. Many individuals do not look for evidence or justification in their religion, but believe in something because that is all they know. Another one of Dawkins’ views on religion differs from Humes in that Dawkins states that believing in God requires more clarification. Dawkins questions why the existence of the universe has to have a creator, but God does not.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Worldview Final Draft

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Those who do not agree with or live according to a Biblical viewpoint may believe that the Earth was part of the Big Bang Theory as suggested by Belgian priest, Georges Lemaitre in the 1920’s. (National Geographic) Others may believe in a worldview that is contradictory to itself. Such as the Naturalist who will state that laws of nature created the appearance of design but yet they cannot say where the universe came from. Something cannot come from nothing.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theistic argument that I think is most plausible is the Cosmological Argument. I think this because to me this is the only argument that is plausible because things do not exist without a cause. For example, people and animals do not exist without reproduction. People must have a first cause to be created and exist. “The cosmological argument for God’s existence goes like this: The world could not exist on its own so there must have been a first cause that brought it into being.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to The Oxford Dictionary, creationism is defined as the belief that the universe and living organisms originate from specific acts of divine creation, as in the biblical account, rather than by natural processes such as evolution. The Oxford Dictionary also defines intelligent design as the theory that life, or the universe, cannot have arisen by chance and was designed and created by some intelligent entity. Tension between scientists and theologians arose in the 18th century, when it became obvious to most researchers that geological processes were exceedingly slow, and must have been accomplished over incredibly long periods of time. These…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    God Is Responsible

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some scientists would say that God is not responsible for anything that happens in the universe because evolution and nature account for everything that happens in the universe. However the counter argument to this from creationists would be that God…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Origin of the Universe

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Origin of the Universe: Creation vs. Coincidence Throughout the years, mankind has examined the universe for signs of its origin. For centuries, two possibilities have been the subject of much debate. Either the beginning of the universe just happened by coincidence, or an intelligent being is responsible for its creation. Scientists agree that in order for the universe to be coincidental, it would have to be infinite in age. During the early 1900’s, scientists have found evidence that disproves this theory of an infinite universe. More recent studies are beginning to reveal the organization or design of the universe. There is no physical evidence of the Creator Himself. However, there is evidence that points to the existence of God. In order to prove the existence of God, we must look at the evidence presented to us in the research of scientists who have studied the universe. Throughout the world, there are many people that conform to an atheistic view of the universe. Atheists believe that the beginning of the universe was mere coincidence. The Christian faith, however, teaches that he creation accounts are found in the first two chapters of the book of Genesis in the Bible. However, there is no evidence that supports this super universe theory. Many atheists believe that by chance, our universe was the product of a "super universe that creates other universes" Whether or not you believe in the existence of God, you must not jump to conclusions about the origin of the universe. What is extraordinary unlikely in 15 billion years, becomes probable in an infinitely old universe. Recently we have also learned that key parameters of our universe fall within small boundaries, making our existence possible. Since for every effect there is a cause, the discovery of the "beginning" pointed to a “Creator”. In light of this scientific evidence, we can now say that the universe is not infinite. There are many…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays