Mgi Team Case Analysis
Subject Code: MGMT2001 Tutorial Day/Time: Monday 6:15 pm
Subject Name: Organisational Behaviour Tutor Name: Chinh Ba Nguyen
Assignment Name or Number: Team Assignment Due Date: Monday 7th of May, 8am Student ID Number 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 538255 379352 566987 587214 Student Name Min Woo Choi Hong Zhu Jing Yang Jacob Carew
1|Page
2|Page
CONTENTS
Part A: analysis …………………………………………………………………………….……….6 Group Development…………………………………………………………………….……….6 Group Process……………………………………………………………………..……….6 Trust………………………………………….……………………………………..……….8 Critique………………………………………………………………………………………9 Leadership ……….……….……….……….……….……….……….……….……….……….10 Critique…………………………………………………………………………….………13 Team Diversity………………………………………………………………………….………14 Critique…………………………………………………………………………………….16 Roles Motivation and Communication………………………………………………………17 Roles…………………………………………………………………………….………..17 Motivation…...…………………………………………………………………………….18 Communication…………………………………………………………………..………19 Critique…………………………………………………………………………….……...19 Part B: recommendation………………………………………………………………………..21 Group Development………………………………………………………………………….21 Critique……………………………………………………………..…………………….22 Leadership ……………………………………………………………………………………23 Critique……………………………………………………………..…………………….25 Team Diversity……………………………………………………………..………………….25 Critique……………………………………………………………..…………………….27 Roles Motivation and Communication…………..……………………………………………27 Critique……………………………………………………………..…………………….28 Conclusion……………………………………………………………..…………………………30 References……………………………………………………………..………………………...31
3|Page
ABSTRACT This report will explores the MGI team, a projected-based self-managing team, aims to point out the problems encountered by the group and provide recommendations, using management theories, to try and combat these problems. In part A of this report, the problems experienced by the group is analysed and explored. This part is divided into easy to navigate subheadings, (group development, leadership, team
Subject Name: Organisational Behaviour Tutor Name: Chinh Ba Nguyen
Assignment Name or Number: Team Assignment Due Date: Monday 7th of May, 8am Student ID Number 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 538255 379352 566987 587214 Student Name Min Woo Choi Hong Zhu Jing Yang Jacob Carew
1|Page
2|Page
CONTENTS
Part A: analysis …………………………………………………………………………….……….6 Group Development…………………………………………………………………….……….6 Group Process……………………………………………………………………..……….6 Trust………………………………………….……………………………………..……….8 Critique………………………………………………………………………………………9 Leadership ……….……….……….……….……….……….……….……….……….……….10 Critique…………………………………………………………………………….………13 Team Diversity………………………………………………………………………….………14 Critique…………………………………………………………………………………….16 Roles Motivation and Communication………………………………………………………17 Roles…………………………………………………………………………….………..17 Motivation…...…………………………………………………………………………….18 Communication…………………………………………………………………..………19 Critique…………………………………………………………………………….……...19 Part B: recommendation………………………………………………………………………..21 Group Development………………………………………………………………………….21 Critique……………………………………………………………..…………………….22 Leadership ……………………………………………………………………………………23 Critique……………………………………………………………..…………………….25 Team Diversity……………………………………………………………..………………….25 Critique……………………………………………………………..…………………….27 Roles Motivation and Communication…………..……………………………………………27 Critique……………………………………………………………..…………………….28 Conclusion……………………………………………………………..…………………………30 References……………………………………………………………..………………………...31
3|Page
ABSTRACT This report will explores the MGI team, a projected-based self-managing team, aims to point out the problems encountered by the group and provide recommendations, using management theories, to try and combat these problems. In part A of this report, the problems experienced by the group is analysed and explored. This part is divided into easy to navigate subheadings, (group development, leadership, team
References: Critique The distributed leadership can only apply to a certain mediation size group enable to managing the task complexity and coordination and integration of team effort possible (van Ameijde et al., 2009) 14 | P a g e stands to benefit from culture and educational diversity (Kearney, Gebert & Voelpel, 2009)