Preview

Metaphysics & Epistemology Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
570 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Metaphysics & Epistemology Paper
G. E. Moore’s Response to Skepticism

Patricia Baiyewu
PHI 472/ Introduction to Metaphysics & Epistemology
October 20, 2012
Professor John Barker

G. E. Moore’s main contributions to philosophy were in the areas of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and philosophical methodology. In epistemology, Moore is remembered as a stalwart defender of commonsense realism. Rejecting skepticism on the one hand, and, on the other, metaphysical theories that would invalidate the commonsense beliefs of “ordinary people” (non-philosophers), Moore articulated three different versions of a commonsense- realist epistemology over the course of his career.
According to data I researched Moore’s epistemological interest also motivated much of his metaphysical work, which to a large extent was focused on the ontology of cognition. In this regard, Moore was an important voice in the discussion of sense-data that dominated Anglo- American epistemology in the early twentieth century. In ethics, Moore is famous for driving home the difference between moral and non-moral properties, which he cashed-out in terms of the non-natural and the natural. Moore’s classification of the moral as non-natural was to be one of the hinges upon which moral philosophy in the Anglo- American academy turned until roughly 1960.
Moore’s approach to philosophizing involved focusing on narrow problems and avoiding grand synthesis. His method was to scrutinize the meanings of the key terms in which philosophers expressed themselves while maintaining an implicit commitment to the ideals of clarity, rigor, and argumentation. This aspect of his philosophical style was sufficiently novel and conspicuous that many saw it as an innovation in philosophical methodology. Moore is widely acknowledged as a founder of analytic philosophy, the kind of philosophy that has dominated the academy in Britain and the United States since roughly the 1930s.
Moore also had a significant influence outside the academic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis Menand’s book, The Metaphysical Club is a self-proclaimed story of ideas in America. Specifically, the book is a narrative history of the birth and influence of American Pragmatism. An ambitious work, which spans from the end of the Civil War past World War II, it traces the intellectual evolution of four main characters: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Charles Peirce, William James, and John Dewey. However Menand’s…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epistemology Phil/201 Quiz

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Claims that we can have some knowledge or ordinary things, but not of metaphysical things.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The analytical philosophers wanted to find out why they knew so much about history and about mathematical truths. The Vienna circle didn’t think that this was necessary because according to them "What remains is not statements, nor a theory, nor a system, but only a method: the method of logical…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, we begin by examining the question “What do we mean when we say we know something?” What exactly is knowledge? We will begin with a presentation that introduces the traditional definition of knowledge. Wood then discusses some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then presents an approach to epistemology that focuses on obtaining the intellectual virtues, a point we will elaborate on in the next lesson.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The analytic program in philosophy is ordinarily dated to the work of English philosophers Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore in the early 20th century. They turned away from then-dominant forms of Hegelianism (objecting in particular to its idealism and purported…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern Epistemology In the book, “Amusing Ourselves to Death,” by Neil Postman, he poses the idea that the medium is essential “because of the way it directs us to organize our minds and integrate our experience of the world, it imposes itself on our consciousness and social institutions in myriad forms” (Postman 18). In the 31 years since this book was written modern epistemology has evolved beyond what Postman could have envisioned. Postman’s definition of epistemology was that it “is a complex and usually opaque subject concerned with the origins and nature of knowledge” (Postman 17). To further define the word epistemology it is “the branch of philosophy that studies the nature of knowledge, its presuppositions and foundations, and its extent and…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Final

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages

    Bibliography: Sosa, Ernest [1980]: “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence Versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge.” In Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 5: Studies in Epistemology. Minneapolis MN: University of Minneapolis Press: 3–25. Stace, W.T. [1967]: “Science and the Physical World.” In Man Against Darkness and Other Essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Tye, Michael [2009]: “A New Look at the Speckled Hen.” In Analysis 60, April: 258–63. Yolton, John W. [1970]: Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a scientific realist’s perspective, the scientific pursuit of truth further gives rise to genuine knowledge of the natural world, thus entailing epistemic realism and accordingly yielding the knowledge of truth about the objective reality investigated by scientists (Sankey, 2008). Epistemic realism characterises scientific realism, insisting that scientific knowledge is not restricted to the observational level, but also unobservable aspects of reality as well. On the contrary, contemporary versions of constructive empiricist deny the possibility of having rationally justified belief or knowledge about unobservable aspects of the world (Sankey,…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Chapter 2

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1-Explain (summarize and explain the main ideas of the philosopher) and evaluate (give reasons to defend your analysis of the views by giving arguments) the view of Anaxagoras regarding the nature of reality?…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aa Paper Philosophy

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I scheduled my AA meeting for Tuesday September the 18th at 10 p.m. at the Sobe Room in Miami Beach (1718 Bay Rd. Miami Beach, Fl. 33139). When I arrived I noticed that the parking was far away from the actual meeting point. The meeting point was a church type structure with no sing or any other identification. The door was open so I just went in; I waited about 5 minutes for the meeting to start. The meeting took place in a large room, and the chairs were organized in a semicircle and at the front there was a kind of podium. In the Sobe Room all meetings are open, so I didn’t have to set an appointment.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    G. E. Moore stated that ‘good’ could not be defined in his book, Principia Ethica. You just know what is good by intuition; you can speak about something being good without knowing how to define it. A weakness of the view that ethical terms have a meaning that we can intuit, but not define, is how can we be sure that our intuitions are correct? Also, why, if my moral obligations are self-evident, do I have dilemmas over conflicting duties? The issue of verification is also raised; intuition may be considered to be a meaningless concept itself, since it is non-verifiable.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Response Paper

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The existence of God has been a huge issue for many, many centuries. In H. J. McCloskey's article "On being an Atheist" he said that the cosmological and teleological arguments are false and that we need to forget the idea of God completely because there is no definitive proof. McCloskey's main issue with the idea of God is the presence of evil in the world. ca…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    epistemology

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Professors Cappon and Myers agree that the process of intuition is an important way to attain knowledge. However Myers criticizes intuition as a perilous means of knowing. This paper will demonstrate that, perhaps instinct is not a foolproof means of attaining knowledge, nevertheless reasoning and logic can fail us as well. It is the human mind rather then the process that causes the error in both causes. Intuition, then, is by no means inferior to the other processes of attaining knowledge.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good in the Moral Context

    • 2443 Words
    • 10 Pages

    One main philosopher who defended the objectivist point of view was George Edward (G.E.) Moore. In his book Principia Ethica, Moore discussed the definition of the word ‘good’. With this book he influenced the philosophers who came after him.…

    • 2443 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although distinctions similar to Kant’s a priori–a posteriori distinction and his synthetic–analytic distinction have been made by thinkers such as Hume and Leibniz, Kant is the first to apply two such distinctions to generate a third category for knowledge. Hume, for instance, does not distinguish between what Kant calls the analytic and the a priori and what he calls the synthetic and the a posteriori, so that, for Hume, all synthetic judgments are necessarily a posteriori. Since only a priori truths have the important qualities of being universal and necessary, all general truths about reality—as opposed to particular observations about unconnected events—must be a priori. If our a priori knowledge is limited to definitional analytic judgments, then Hume is right in concluding that rationally justified knowledge of universal and necessary truths is impossible. Kant’s coup comes in determining that synthetic judgments can also be a priori. He shows that mathematics and scientific principles are neither analytic nor a posteriori, and he provides an explanation for the category of the synthetic a priori by arguing that our mental faculties shape our…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics