Preview

Mens Rea And The Model Penal Code

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
352 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mens Rea And The Model Penal Code
Mens rea is a Latin term meaning "guilty mind". It refers to the criminal intent that is necessary as an element to be proven in a crime. Many civil law claims also include some level of mens rea as a required element.
The four levels of mens rea set forth in the Model Penal Code are:
1. Purposely - Express purpose to commit a specific crime against a particular person
2. Knowingly - Knowledge that one's actions would certainly result in a crime against someone, but did not specifically intend to commit that crime against the particular victim which one is accused of injuring
3. Recklessly - Knew that one's actions had an unjustifiable risk of leading to a certain result, but did not care about that risk ("reckless disregard"), and acted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Intentional torts: harm caused by deliberate action. Ex: newspaper columnist who wrongly accuses someone of being a drunk has committed intentional torts…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Besides showing that the person committed the unlawful act (Actus reus), a mental component must too be satisfied. The mental component is referred to as the mens rea, meaning “intention to do wrong”. This intention must be established for most findings of criminal responsibility. The importance of mens rea is obvious. If an accused person is suffering from a mental disorder which deprives them of reason and understanding, the mens rea necessary for criminal responsibility may be…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a. True b. False 12. What is mens rea: guilty mind 13. What is Actus Rea: guilty act 14. What is concurrence: both guilty mind and act 15. In the Defense of Justification, one agrees they committed the act a. true b. False 16.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some crimes are only committed intentionally so must distinguish from recklessness e.g. GBH * Direct intent – It was D’s purpose/aim/objective to bring about the AR. - Duff = test of failure – would D intend their actions to be a failure * Oblique intent – The AR was a necessary by-product of D committing his offence, although it was not his purpose. * Intent is a subjective concept and must be judged according to what D wanted to happen or foresaw happening (s.8 Criminal Justice Act 1967 = lays down evidential rule as to how intention is to be proved and…

    • 2945 Words
    • 85 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Penal Reform Paper

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages

    2 INTRODUCTION What’s the problem? 2 MODEL How are we going to approach it? 4 DATA Observations. 5 RESULTS What did we find? 6 EXTENSIONS Quadratic and interactive relationships. 7 CONCLUSION What does it all mean? In Depth Statistical Analysis…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Model Penal Code

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Model Penal Code was enacted to specify certain offenses. The Model Penal Code is one of the most vital improvements in American law; possibly the most important influence on American criminal law since it was completed in 1962. Conceived as a way to standardize and categorize the often fragmentary criminal codes enacted by the states; the Model Penal Code has influenced a large majority of states to change their laws. Some provisions of the Model Penal Code are now considered outdated, it still manages to help. Members of the American Law Institute, which is a group of judges, lawyers, and legal scholars whose purpose is to clarify and progress the law, began working on the Model Penal Code in 1952. The group had deserted two preceding attempts to generate a model criminal code. The third attempt took ten years, and the American Law Institute produced numerous drafts. Herbert Wechsler, a Columbia Law School professor, served as the chief reporter or principal drafter. From 1953 to 1962, American Law Institute council members scrutinized, judged, and debated the work of Wechsler, in a total of 31 drafts.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Actus Reus and Mens Rea

    • 327 Words
    • 1 Page

    Furthermore, there is a category of offences known as "strict liability offences", for which there need not be any evidence of mens rea i.e. you can be found guilty of commiting a crime even without knowing it. This includes offences such as dog fouling, breaking the highway code etc. Essentially, it says that ignorance of the law is no defence, you're guilty through the actus reus alone.…

    • 327 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corpus Delecti

    • 1135 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The guilty act or actus reus is the actual crime that has been committed. The concept of culpability or blameworthiness is the key element in actus reus. If a degree of culpability is not met then there can not be a guilty act. It is up to the state to prove actus reus. The state must prove all of the elements of actus reus based upon statute law that already exists.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    MENS REA

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Crimes involving mens rea are of two types, (i) crimes of basic intent and (ii) crimes of specific intent.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ii. And result crimes (series of events) – a forbidden consequence results from the physical conduct (eg. A death). Usually you have to prove Mens Rea for all parts of the series of events (eg. Murder – intention to do the act and intention to cause death)…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aspects of Criminal Law

    • 3515 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Actus Rea is the physical element of a crime which is basically what the defendant has done and not done. Actus Rea can be:…

    • 3515 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mens Rea – refers to criminal intent. In other words, what was a defendant was thinking and what was their intent when the crime was committed. It helps the criminal justice system determine between someone who did not mean to commit an act to those who set out to commit a crime.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Intention in Criminal Law

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Latin word mens rea, when translated means ‘guilty mind’ is defined in the Black’s Law Dictionary as “the state of mind that the prosecution, to secure a conviction, must prove that a defendant had when committing a crime.”…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mens Rea refers to the guilty mind required for criminal liability. Intention and recklessness are the two forms of Mens Rea that are part of most offences and have been the subject of judicial scrutiny. There is a vast volume of case law on intention and recklessness which demonstrates the problems that courts have had in perfecting an appropriate definition. Mens Rea is concerned with the defendants state of mind at the time of the Actus Reus. It is difficult to prove what was in someones mind which partially explains why the courts struggle with these words. Intention is the most culpable form of mens Rea. This is because it is more blameworthy to cause harm deliberately (intention) than it is to do so carelessly (recklessness). Therefore intention is used in more serious offences. Murder requires intention to kill or cause GBH which sets it apart from other, less capable, forms of homicide. There is normally no need for an elaborate definition of intention in order to decide whether an Actus Reus was intended.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Actus Reus is the guilty act or omission in the commissioning of a crime. In short, it is what the offender does or doesn't do which results in a crime taking place. Mens Rea is the guilty mind behind the crime. It is what tells the offender that what they are doing or not doing is wrong but they do it regardless. An act can be described as an action carried out by the offender in order to commit the crime. On the other hand, an omission is the opposite, where an offender neglects to take action to prevent a crime. To omit something is to leave it out, failure to act (Halsey, 1986, p. 704). For example: Watching someone have a heart attack and no attempting to render assistance or call an ambulance could be classified as an omission. The failure to render assistance or calling an ambulance resulted in the person's death.…

    • 2377 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics