Preview

Memi And Sabu Comparison Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
457 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Memi And Sabu Comparison Essay
After viewing the statue of Memi and Sabu and the seated statue of Gudea, some similarities can definitely be found but digging deeper, other meanings are there as well. It was common in the fourth Dynasty for sculptures and statues to be made to honor the dead or to ensure that they are well known and remembered for future generations. Many different areas of the world practiced this and hence there are quite a few styles and materials used, as well as the overall meaning and purpose of its creation.

The statue of Memi and Sabu was basically created as a placeholder for the souls of a presumed married couple to allow them to eat and collect the physical gifts and offerings left behind for them, and was most likely left in a hidden compartment in the tomb of the deceased. It is crafted of limestone and is detailed with an included inscription near the base indicating the identities of whom is portrayed in the statue. It should be noted that the masculine figure is not posing in the typical
…show more content…
Gudea was a ruler of Mesopotamia and focused his efforts on rebuilding the temples of Lagash; he was also rather vain in insisting that statues in his likeness were created and placed throughout the remodeled temples. This particular statue is crafted from Diorite and shows him in a seated position with some Sumerian text inscribed in his robing detailing the actual temples he renovated and his identity. It differs from the statue of Memi and Sabu not only in its choice of construction material but also in the fact that Gudea most likely had this and many others made to congratulate himself and preserve his honor throughout time. There's good chance that Memi and Sabu did not ask for their statue to be created but it was made anyway according to primitive religious and burial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the years, throughout the world there are being discovered important art pieces created by known, unknown artists or simply by people who want to pay tribute to someone in particular, who has different and special elements behind. Around the world, investigators have discovered millions of beautiful and significant pieces that symbolize some important events in the lives of a culture, of a people or a civilization. Such is the case of the discovery of two statues of great goddesses; Nike of Samothrace and Coatlicue, both have strong similarities as well as differences, they had different cultures and myths, and also had artistic and symbolic elements.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two sculptures I chose were The Statue of the Goddess Sakhmet and Monumental Figure. The Sakhmet statue is from the New Kingdom era, 18th Dynasty. Dated all the way back to ca. 1390-1352 B.C. in Egypt. It is made out of granodiorite. There are two identical at the museum in New York. The Monumental Figure is from the 9th century. It was found in Mexico, it is from the Mayan culture. The statue is classified as a stone-sculpture. You can find the Monumental figure in gallery 358 and the Goddess Sakhmet you can find in gallery 135 at the Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kroisos Vs. Ka-Aper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    material used to create them is not at all. Ka-Aper was carved from a tree trunk…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marble Stele Analysis

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The monument is in a very good condition although some part of the stone are chipped off. The overall form and figure were kept in a very good condition; therefore, it shows the advantages of using marble. Since marble is a long lasting material, the work that created on marble stone would last longer than other materials. But at the same time marble stone is a very hard material to carve on, and it would take more time to create a piece of art than using any other materials. Also, the transportation would be hard, because it is very heavy, so damages would…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In reading more about the Winged Victory of Samothrace, I was able to learn about the Greek goddess after which the statue is created. Victory was a goddess that would appear after a great triumph, whether it be athletic or war based. Upon her arrival she would bear a wreath, trumpet, or fillet to the conquerors. In return, wine, or milk would be offered to the goddess as a libation. This statue is extremely complex, and in reading about it I learned a great deal about how difficult it would be to create such a piece.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The original location of this limestone sculpture was Giza, in Nedjemu 's tomb. This work has since been removed and relocated to The University of Memphis Egyptian Antiquities Museum.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1020 Ch

    • 427 Words
    • 3 Pages

    16. View figure 3.4 on page 69 in the text. What features does the statue borrow from the Greek “Doryphorus” statue?…

    • 427 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statue of Kouros

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Statue of a kouros and the Portrait statue of a boy both depict similar subjects, however are greatly different in how they accomplish this task. Through detail, or lack there of, the Greeks and Romans are able to display a certain value they have in its members. These two statues were made about 500 years apart and approach the sculpting process quit differently. The Greek statue seems to use geometric exaggerated lines to form the body while the Romans use a more realistic approach and sculpt the body with a more rounded finish. Statue of a kouros, from about 590 B.C and Portrait of a boy, from about the first century, do not share any great technical aspects and are basically nothing alike.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Seated Scribe

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After going through the chapters of the textbook I have come across two sculptures that has both similarities and differences. In chapter three I came across the Seated Scribe, it originated in ancient Egypt and was carved in limestone. The seated scribe stood out the most because majority of the sculptures in Egypt were kings or queens standing straight up with their hands placed firmly against their sided. Instead, the seated scribe was very relax with his legs crossed underneath each other.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The statue has many interesting and defining characteristics. The statue of Akhenaton is made of sandstone and is approximately 13 feet high. Upon seeing it for the first time, the first thing that becomes apparent is that one of the arms is broken off. Aside from this, the statue has almost perfect symmetry. Because of the position of the hands, it can be safely assumed that both arms mirrored each other. The statue has good balance. It does not vary much in width. The headdress is almost twice has tall as the face, and the headdress surrounds the entire face, almost acting like a frame for it. This gives importance and draws focus towards the face. This is significant because the entire statue, especially the face, uses many feminine characteristics. In this statue of Akhenaton, the thighs are wide, the hips are narrow, the face is elongated and narrow, the lips are large, the arms and fingers are narrow and long, and there are breasts. The face is also important because it is looking straight ahead. This makes any person want to stare right back at it. Again, this helps to bring focus to the unusual characteristics used in the statue.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brooklyn Museum Visit

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This statue is made from Granite which is a type of stone found from earth, so it is believed that the artist used some sort of chisel and hammer to create this art piece, since modern machinery was not available at the time.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many works of art have hidden influence in them stemming out from all parts of the world. With these influences come themes tied to each type of work. The Warrior and Transformation Mask are just a couple examples of this. The Warrior was created in between 900-400 BC, created by the Olmec, it was one of the many giant heads found all over the Olmec area usually brought over land and along rivers. They are thought to be created to honor specific rulers and are a testament to his power. Approximately 134 have been found from 5 to 12 feet and weighing 5 to over 20 tons and all are unique. It’s influence has spread all over the world from the Statue of Liberty to the Great Sphinx all the way to the Statue of Liberty. They are all statues larger…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand the statue of Gudea was made between 2150-2100 B.C. in the Neo- Sumerian culture. Unlike Sabi and Memi that represents the non-royal, the statue of Gudea represented one of the heroes of Neo Sumerian culture, Gudea of Lagash, it was considered to be the intermediary between citizens and the God.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gudea Statue Analysis

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    There are approximately twenty-seven statues of Gudea. I choose to write about a seated one probably from Girsu (modern Tello). The time period was Neo-Sumerian around 2090 B.C. The medium was diorite. Diorite is a medium to course grained invasive igneous rock. Diorite has about the same basic properties as granite but may be a little darker in color and harder to come by.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first item I examined was the royal acquaintance Memi and Sabu, from Dynasty 4 2575-2464 BCE. It is painted limestone out of Giza donated by the Rogers Fund in 1948. This statue evokes the intimacy of Memi and his companion, Sabu, although she is set somewhat apart by her oblique gaze. Until recently, the flowering of non royal statuary was believed to have occurred only in the 5th and 6th dynasties. Recent studies indicate however many of these non royal statues, including Memi and Sabu are better dated to the 4th dynasty, contemporary with great royal statuary programs. The early date for Memi and Sabu is based both on her coiffure and on the reciprocated embrace.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays